Discussion Board

Part II: Most common blunders in English usage


Total 171 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7   Older >
Rajesh Nair
Good presentation.
by Rajesh Nair on Apr 28, 2011 04:39 PM  | Hide replies

Indeed very helpful to many.
Can anyone tell how to read the word "surprise"? Is it pronounced as "suprise"?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Arvind
Re: Good presentation.
by Arvind on Apr 28, 2011 04:58 PM
No, it is pronounced 'suRprise'

   Forward   |   Report abuse
John King
Re: Good presentation.
by John King on Apr 28, 2011 04:59 PM
Surprise should be read as sur prize, suprise is wrong pronounciation

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Arvind
Re: Re: Good presentation.
by Arvind on Apr 28, 2011 05:04 PM
No, it isn't. It is pronounced as 'Surprise' only.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Rajesh Nair
Re: Re: Good presentation.
by Rajesh Nair on Apr 28, 2011 05:04 PM
Thanks to both of you. I got confused many times i have heard educated people pronouncing it as 'suprise'

   Forward   |   Report abuse
vivek mallurwar
Re: Re: Re: Good presentation.
by vivek mallurwar on May 05, 2011 09:21 AM
It's surprising... I have not came across with such people.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Prateek C
Re: Good presentation.
by Prateek C on Apr 28, 2011 10:48 PM
It can be pronounced both ways depending whether the accent is rhotic or non-rhotic. In British English (actually English-English as Scotland has rhotic accent), "r" after a vowel is usually silent. In most parts of Americe (except for some north-eastern states like masachussetts) the accent is rhetoric. So they'll pronounce the "r" after the vowel.

eg, in Britain, "father" and "farther" is pronounced the same.

Search for rhotic accent on google.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sadab  alam
Re: Re: Good presentation.
by sadab alam on Apr 29, 2011 01:55 AM
It is pronounced "suh" "prize". The r is not pronounced.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Subramanian R
Re: Re: Good presentation.
by Subramanian R on May 12, 2011 03:15 AM
You are WRONG. There is less stress on r, but it is there; they do not stress like we do : faarrther ! HAHA.....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Visharad Software
Re: Good presentation.
by Visharad Software on Apr 29, 2011 04:16 AM
In received pronunciation, "r" before a consonant sound is silent.
Therefore, surprise is pronounced as
su-prise
Give a small pause between pronouncing 'u' and 'p'.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mehul Mehta
Funny Language
by Mehul Mehta on Apr 28, 2011 04:17 PM  | Hide replies

dats vai English es wary Phunny Langwaje.
U kan talk engligh wak english.

Our Languages like Sanskrit and Hindi are much greater in Pronunciation and spellings. Pity that people today use only English even at home instead of their Mother Tongue.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Mahesh Pasad
Re: Funny Language
by Mahesh Pasad on Apr 29, 2011 11:32 AM
Yes, we should respect our language and use it more often. Ignoring our language indicates lack of honor in one's past culture/heritage.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
John King
Re: Funny Language
by John King on Apr 28, 2011 04:55 PM
your character is reflected by your written english

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Tikha Karela
Re: Funny Language
by Tikha Karela on Apr 28, 2011 04:20 PM
You are One and a Half smart pathetic looser!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mehul Mehta
Re: Re: Funny Language
by Mehul Mehta on Apr 28, 2011 04:24 PM
and you seem to be the looser with knowledge of 2 words 'Pathetic' & 'Looser'. ya and also 'Suck' from one of your posts below.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Tikha Karela
In my opinioun
by Tikha Karela on Apr 28, 2011 04:01 PM  | Hide replies

Both parts of the write up by MADAM preeti were Pretty useless. Any pathetic looser could write better.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Arvind
Re: In my opinioun
by Arvind on Apr 28, 2011 04:48 PM
yes indeed it is your 'opinioun'

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Arvind
Re: Re: In my opinioun
by Arvind on Apr 28, 2011 04:49 PM
and of course any 'looser' could write better, loser.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Abhishek Jain
Why Shakespeare is not part of English?
by Abhishek Jain on Apr 28, 2011 03:37 PM  | Hide replies

Why have they removed words like THY, THOU, THEE etc which were used by Shakespeare in his literature.....!! Was Shakespeare's language not sophisticated enough?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Tikha Karela
Re: Why Shakespeare is not part of English?
by Tikha Karela on Apr 28, 2011 04:13 PM
THou suckest!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Arvind
Re: Re: Why Shakespeare is not part of English?
by Arvind on Apr 28, 2011 05:11 PM
did you mean, thou sucketh? ;)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Krishna Mohan
Good info
by Krishna Mohan on Apr 28, 2011 02:55 PM

Very useful

    Forward  |  Report abuse
chatter
A totlly confused language
by chatter on Apr 28, 2011 02:55 PM  | Hide replies

They write it as "cannauled-gee" and speak it as "nolej" ? Then how can we get proper knowledge of this language ?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
nogita
Re: A totlly confused language
by nogita on Apr 28, 2011 03:59 PM
english is a very poor language. It has no words for hindi words like massi, mama, jeeja, sali, sandoo etc, use only uncle aunti or in-law etc. We can call english a code language. Every letter have differt pronounciation depends on its place in the word. Also many words pronounciaiton is same but meaning is different depends on purpose of use.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Indian Saint
Re: Re: A totlly confused language
by Indian Saint on Apr 28, 2011 04:53 PM
Hindi is the best? It does not have a neutral gender- everything is masculine or feminine- how funny that could be? Tell me condom in hindi- is it a man or a woman?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
tanmay patil
Re: Re: Re: A totlly confused language
by tanmay patil on Jul 19, 2011 05:21 PM
Hindi and all languages derived from sanskrit have a neutral gender .. where do you get such tosh from indian stupid :P

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Srini
??
by Srini on Apr 28, 2011 11:36 AM  | Hide replies

"Remember, a little care can help prevent a great deal of miscommunication or more importantly embarrassment."
Why embarrassment? After all it's a foreign language and you improver over a period of time.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
William Shakespeare
Re: ??
by William Shakespeare on Apr 28, 2011 11:40 AM
Corrections needed:

Why THE embarrassment? After all, (, is missing) it's a foreign language and you IMPROVE (and not improver) over a period of time.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Srini
Re: Re: ??
by Srini on Apr 28, 2011 11:54 AM
Thanks. I am enlightened :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Total 171 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7   Older >
Write a message