Discussion Board

Govt: Who''s responsible for CAT fiasco?


Total 30 messages Pages | 1 | 2   Older >
rohit mukkawar
Kapil Sibal trying to get back at IIMs...
by rohit mukkawar on Dec 01, 2009 05:14 PM  | Hide replies

finally HRD minister has got some point to hang on to and hit back at IIM directors who did not want HRD ministry's interference in their operations...
Hope HRD minister doesn't blame it on Opposition parties or Pakistan...;) One entrance exam, few glitches and it becomes a national issue...!!!!!!!!!!
long live India...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Hebbar R
Re: Kapil Sibal trying to get back at IIMs...
by Hebbar R on Dec 01, 2009 06:18 PM
The HRD Minister is acting as if his own Dept (and he himself) is totally mistake free. If an event like the CAT was organised by the Govt, then it is left to ones imagination as to how it would have turned out. This is not to say that it is okay for IIMs to mis-handle an important test as this.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Atis Mitra
CAT tests
by Atis Mitra on Dec 01, 2009 05:09 PM  | Hide replies

In India the people in positions are like square pegs in round holes.
Mechanical engineers are heading electronics departments.So anything is possible

    Forward  |  Report abuse
V SR
Re: CAT tests
by V SR on Dec 01, 2009 05:56 PM
Well you were nearest as both were engineers. How about doctors, managing finance for a large corporation?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Hebbar R
Re: Re: CAT tests
by Hebbar R on Dec 01, 2009 06:18 PM
And how about all kindly of Law-breakers getting elected as Law-Makers????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Hebbar R
Re: Re: Re: CAT tests
by Hebbar R on Dec 01, 2009 06:19 PM
And how about all kinds of law breakers getting elected as law makers????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ramdas Sambamurthy
Re: Re: Re: CAT tests
by Ramdas Sambamurthy on Dec 02, 2009 08:48 PM
This is a very valid comment, but won't stick on the "greasy" law makers.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
NEELAKANTAN R
Who is reposible for what?
by NEELAKANTAN R on Dec 01, 2009 05:07 PM

For every thing an enquiry will be conducted and it will take years to get results. If that is so what for Government is responsible. Only for issuing some statements?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
NEELAKANTAN R
Who is reposible for what?
by NEELAKANTAN R on Dec 01, 2009 05:07 PM

For every thing an enquiry will be conducted and it will take years to get results. If that is so what for Government is responsible. Only for issuing some statements?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
dev anand
Least credibility for CAT 2009
by dev anand on Dec 01, 2009 05:05 PM

The problem is not just a standalone one where students could not log in. Those who could not take the test would be permitted to take the test later. But what about the candidates who faced issues like their system performing very slow and resulting in loss of time.
Apart from this some students reported that after their system rebooted, due to a faulty software, they were allowed an extra 30 mins by the software. This is just the tip of the iceberg, as many would not have reported the 'BONAZA' by Prometric. The most absurd thing about CAT 2009 is that some questons started repeating from day 2 onwards and the pathetic aspect of this is that candidates were not supposed to discuss or reproduce the questions verbally,electronically or by print. As a result some candidates who were brilliant enough to send dummy candidates benefited the most and those who followed ethics would be left behind

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Atis Mitra
CAT tests
by Atis Mitra on Dec 01, 2009 05:01 PM  | Hide replies

In India the people in positions are like square pegs in round holes.
Mechanical engineers are heading electronics departments.So anything is possible

    Forward  |  Report abuse
NEELAKANTAN R
Re: CAT tests
by NEELAKANTAN R on Dec 01, 2009 05:10 PM
When you can have a SSLC failed man as education minister (not the current case) then anyhting is possible. Do Not grimble. The administartion requires only common sense and ruthlessness.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Hebbar R
Re: Re: CAT tests
by Hebbar R on Dec 01, 2009 06:21 PM
Absoultely right.

Worse case was a person who had copied to pass an exam was made education Minister in a State Govt.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
shaharai
why government is not involved in the process
by shaharai on Dec 01, 2009 04:49 PM  | Hide replies

Sibal said the government is not involved in the process. What ever happens in the country government is responsible. this statement implies how the current government is irresponsible.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
s J
Re: why government is not involved in the process
by s J on Dec 01, 2009 04:58 PM
hey duffer...IIMs are atumnous bodies..dont u remember tehy were fighting to get autonomuous.. Now why do u got to govt whn thr is a prob..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
shaharai
Re: Re: why government is not involved in the process
by shaharai on Dec 01, 2009 05:01 PM
atumnous, means government will not take responsibility?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 30 messages Pages: | 1 | 2   Older >
Write a message