The issue of the Kashmiri Hindous. Was that wrong? Or demanding revocation of the Prevention of Terrorism Act and stringent measures against terrorists? Or the agitation for the Amarnath land and preservation of the unique world heritage and a symbol of faith like the Ram Sethu? The nationalists opposed the divisive politics of Raj Thackeray, who was propped up by the Congress to counter the Shiv Sena. Was opposing Raj wrong? They were responsible for Pokaran-II and were committed to preserve our rights for Pokaran-III if needed. Was that against the national interest? On the eve of the polls they said forget 1984, but remember Gujarat. What mentality did it show? The nationalists wanted Article 370 to go and Kashmir fully integrated with the rest of India. Was that against national integration? Should India be governed on religious fragmentation and parochial chauvinism or on the basis of egalitarianism, equal rights and privileges to all rising above the communal lines? Let everyone ponder -- Hindous have been continuously assaulted for the last 1,200 years. Do they have a right to preserve their heritage and way of life after a partitioned independence or not?
Re: What were the issues that the 'communalists' raised?
by Sardar Patel on May 25, 2009 04:30 PM
On the contrary Congress, whatever they believed in, they delivered. Removed POTA, faced opposition. Didn't relent. Introduced reservations for the Muslims. Faced opposition. Didn't relent. Constituted Sachar Committee. Its divisive attitude and faulty inferences were discussed and severely criticised. It didn't budge an inch and carried on. Faced a barrage of criticism on the delay in hanging Parliament attack accused Afzal Guru. It stood sweetly firm. It de-froze Octavio Quattrocchi's accounts in London, unshackled him from the Central Bureau of Investigation. The media and the others cried foul. So what? It remained cool. It kept silent over Nandigram, Singur. But had the prudence to tie up with the Trinamool Congress. And succeeded in defeating the Left. It gave huge amounts of plan allocation funds to the minorities ignoring the majority Hindou concerns. So what? It got Hindou middle-class votes plus Muslim ones. It faced flak on its policy to combat terrorism, had to change its home minister and the chief minister of Maharashtra post the 26/11 attacks. Yet it won in Mumbai handsomely. It got a nuke deal passed despite the entire Opposition and one of its key allies opposing it in one language. It saw silently that Parliament was turned into a bazaar. Yet it won the Muslims and a new mandate. And the Hindoutva group faced a powerfully hostile section of the media. Some of them became an instrument to oppose Hindou assertions maligning them with celebrative ent
Re: What were the issues that the 'communalists' raised?
by dhandu on May 25, 2009 04:47 PM
UPA has changed the emblem of the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan from Lotus and shining Sun to Cross and Crescent. And this has been done in the name of “broader reflection of national ethos.” Board of Governors of KVS in its 79th meeting held on 26.6.2008 approved the new logo and a circular was sent to all offices and schools of the Sangathan on July 17, 2008, to change the emblem in all the publications and communications. Though the chairman of KVS, HRD Minister Arjun Singh did not attend the meeting, the minutes of the meeting stated that the emblem has been approved by the chairman. His deputy Shri Md Ali Ashraf Fatmi, Minister of State, HRD & Deputy Chairman, was also not present at the meeting. circular issued by the Asst. Commissioner (Acad I), KVS, said “in order to give a broader reflection of national ethos and ought (sic) to be inclusive of challenges, opportunities, rationalistic, scientific and global thinking, advances in science & technology & social changes taking place in the society” (sic) the new emblem has been created.The picture shows a book with blank pages, and apparently two human forms emerging from globe. The crescent (an Islamic symbol) and two crosses and stars (Christian) are obvious. UPA govt released coins of Rs 2 denomination with cross on them. There is move to change our national motto ‘Satyameva Jayate’
Re: Re: What were the issues that the 'communalists' raised?
by Cricket on May 25, 2009 05:30 PM
To dhundu, durga, patel - wondering wen all u loosers will grow up
Re: Re: Re: What were the issues that the 'communalists' raised
by subramanyasastry hoskote on May 26, 2009 12:29 AM
truth triumphs no longer holds in this age of deceit and cheating.
Re: Re: Re: What were the issues that the 'communalists' raised
by lagaan on May 26, 2009 10:02 AM
thats what you should ask yourself, your thinking of congcross which is a reflection of feudalistic, burdent of legacy of nehrus (gandhi is a definite misnomer for indira, sonia etc..) mindset. congress dead with mahatma.
Re: What were the issues that the 'communalists' raised?
by AmarAkbarAntony on May 26, 2009 01:03 PM
Forget governing us,the educated Indians, who respect each others dignity, until you give up your clearly dented ideologies.You'll only devastate india's development, if voted to power, inflicting communal problems and nothing else. You party won't win elections until Congress does some mistake
Narendra Modi's black magic is over and his dynasty in Gujarat is started to collapse. Better Modi accept all his wrong doings and if he apologizes to the people who suffered under his rule can change their tough stand against him. If not he will be in real danger within short time.
Re: Narendra Modi - Mochi
by Atul Neogi on May 25, 2009 05:31 PM
Dont go to a high on winning election, the fall can be more painful. It is true for all parties BJP and also the congresswalas like you.
Re: Narendra Modi - Mochi
by lagaan on May 26, 2009 09:46 AM
you dont seem to know the meaning of dynasty.... Modi is a bachellor and has no dynastic angle to his politics.
Re: Narendra Modi - Mochi
by Karthikeyan Ramakrishna on May 25, 2009 04:04 PM
view rahul and sukanya devi story which was suppressed by media type the above names in goo gle and browe the links.
Re: Re: Narendra Modi - Mochi
by Cricket on May 25, 2009 04:10 PM
I guess we dont have to go too far to ggole for modi or advani or rahul mahajan or MM joshi... pls do that as well... u indeed have a depth of history
all so called secular political groups are with congress are fighting for muslim votebank and some section of media projected bjp communal andpro hindu while congress is secular rapist jihadi rahul is projected as as youth leader congress get minority vote bcuz of appeasement and divide and rule. 15% special package to one particular community on the cost of mejority and protecting jihadies isi agents mullas & giving id card & job to all illegal immigrants from neibhbouring countries to increase minority votes In mumbai they broke takhre bros and divide shivsena vote in some states like AP samll political group devided votes which was beneficial for congress congress excel in dirty politics it treats mejorit as B grade citizen and skkkky is limit to appease minoritites for votes bjp 25 yrs old party ruled country for 6 yrs and in 5 states no presence still managed to get 26.% votes still the party of middle class congress is party of muslims xians, dalim muslim dalit xians and underworld mafia dons. gangster, isi agents congress got 7% extra vote for development of minority politics which is loss for mafia communists, lalu mulayam etc... congress is curse to nation congress is not only no 1 enemy of mejority the party expolit minority, poor illeterate to win election even 50 yers of congress rule still 27% below poverty level, terrorist attack ,bomb blast corruption, farmerdeath price hike are upa rule highlights. upa rule is creating enemity between community,
Re: bjp is only party which can challange congress
by Suman Bhat on May 25, 2009 03:52 PM
upa govt devalued the ind judicial, education electrol system for vote bankpolitics they demoralised ind security force upa will do anything everthing to increase minority votes giving undue favours to mulsim community on cost of mejority same benefits do not apply to minority hindus in JK, punjab assam tripura nagaland and sikkim. double standard bogus secularism
Re: its a fact..
by Suman Bhat on May 25, 2009 03:57 PM
many of like u support congress bcuz u guys want make india islambad. u guys oppose UCC but support congress which will do anything for muslim votes under minority tag when your own bros sis burn alive during train journey, will be killed by bomblast while parying or doing festive shopping or quiked out of locality by jihaide terrorists and u have to live like refuggee in camps in your own country like kashmiri pundits you will realise how dirty politics cogress is playing even 50yrs congress rule /appeasement policy 50% muslims are poor and illetrate that the gift of congress to minority vote bank
Re: its a fact..
by Karthikeyan Ramakrishna on May 25, 2009 04:08 PM
view rahul and sukanya devi story which was suppressed by media type the above names in goo gle and browe the links.
Re: Re: its a fact..
by Cricket on May 25, 2009 04:12 PM
I guess we dont have to go too far to ggole for modi or advani or rahul mahajan or MM joshi... pls do that as well... u indeed have a depth in history
Re: Re: Re: its a fact..
by Karthikeyan Ramakrishna on May 25, 2009 04:20 PM
view rahul and sukanya devi story which was suppressed by media type the above names in goo gle and browe the links.
Re: Somebody please make a movie named Nirnayak Sarkar
by subramanyasastry hoskote on May 26, 2009 12:41 AM
and you will be living your role as a ...... for the italian and her family members.
Before the election and on election campaign and after the poll BJP's Venkayya Naidu was in high hope all the time he accused Congress Gvt. and he said citizens of this Country will show the door to Congress, but where is Mr. Niadu no body knows in which mouse hole he is hiding now, people shows the door to him and his party, but Mr. Naidu still hiding inside the mouse hole I think.
Re: Naidu is hiding
by Karthikeyan Ramakrishna on May 25, 2009 04:06 PM
view rahul and sukanya devi story which was suppressed by media type the above names in goo gle and browe the links.
Re: Re: Naidu is hiding
by Cricket on May 25, 2009 04:12 PM
I guess we dont have to go too far to ggole for modi or advani or rahul mahajan or MM joshi... pls do that as well... u indeed have a depth in history
People in this forum are writing and talking about BJP. Why are you people concerned about a almost dead party. Please forget the past and the Golden era coming. Pl talk about Rahulji and Priyankaji our future. Please imagine when Rahulji become Priminister, there will be no povery and unemployment in India. It will be true.
Re: Why talking about BJP & Advani
by Karthikeyan Ramakrishna on May 25, 2009 03:16 PM
You are telling to forget the past UPA and the Golden era coming in future under BJP what a hypocrite are you, first improve your english.
Re: Re: Re: Why talking about BJP & Advani
by Cricket on May 25, 2009 03:26 PM
Karthikeyan Ramakrishna or whtever... BJPeee will definitely come in 2074.. wait tii then
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why talking about BJP & Advani
by Karthikeyan Ramakrishna on May 25, 2009 03:50 PM
No probs it may be much earlier from that time no other party will exist
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why talking about BJP & Advani
by Karthikeyan Ramakrishna on May 25, 2009 04:07 PM
view rahul and sukanya devi story which was suppressed by media type the above names in goo gle and browe the links.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why talking about BJP & Advani
by Cricket on May 25, 2009 04:12 PM
I guess we dont have to go too far to ggole for modi or advani or rahul mahajan or MM joshi... pls do that as well... u indeed have a depth in history
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why talking about BJP & Advani
by Cricket on May 25, 2009 03:53 PM
by then even ur kids will be promoting congress... if u live to see tht day
Re: Re: Why talking about BJP & Advani
by Radha Krishnan on May 25, 2009 06:49 PM
Karthikeyan Ramakrishana Pl read as Please forget the past and talk about the Golden era coming.
Old habbits die hard. Even in defeat Advani is disgraceful.
He himself made it a personality clash between MMS & himself. He raised the point of weak PM. He raised the issue of decisive leader.
Instead of gracefully accepting that people of the country have rejected him lock, stock and barrel, he is upto his old antics again.
He still talks of people rejecting the Communists and 3rd Front. Wake up Mr Advani. You have lost total credibility. There were always 2 main opposition parties in Indian politics, whether the earstwhile Janta Party or the Bhartiya Janta Party today. MMS charge that the self proclaimed Iron Man melted when the need arose in Kandahar has stuck with the voters. Your performance as home minister was disastrous - only a notch better than Shivraj Patil.The world knows that people have voted you to be a weak & indecissive leader.
And as if to prove them right, you first tried to create a sympathy by announcing that you will not be leader of opposition and then changed your own decision saying party members dont let you go.
Sorry!This is not a sign of a decisive leader. I am sure had Atalji been in your place he would have have quit without giving people a chance to talk.
Today members of BJP say that you were not a right leader to project. Children of BJP leaders do not vote for BJP. Should there still be something more ignominious for you Mr Advani???
R u in any way different than Lalu & co? Pls go before BJP boots you out.
Re: PM - in - Waiting
by Karthikeyan Ramakrishna on May 25, 2009 03:23 PM
India is higly polluted by anti-indians like you who bring the anti national to power.
Re: PM - in - Waiting
by vikas sethi on May 25, 2009 03:01 PM
True 3rd Front and commies lost. But Could you please analyse and inform why did BJP not gain those seats? Why did all these seats go to Congress?
This is what BJP should think and talk about. Do Not offer lame excuses as offered by Advani.
BJP does not have a presence in the entire country.It depends on its allies to take it to power. These are inherent shortcomings of the BJP.
