Left is considering to form a non BJP & Non congress govt with all the regional parties. Someone plz tell them that even in their wildest dream all other parties will not get to 272. The total number of seats congress and BJP get will be more then 272. SO at any cost it will be a BJP or congress govt.
Re: Left are fools
by Vivek Kumar on May 15, 2009 10:46 AM
Indian politician speaks to one of his slave, another slum dog, i wonder why elections are held, we always win, questions are standard and our response is also standard.
Their are no roads- We are Secular and BJP is communal
Population is 116 crore, it will be soon 150 crore-Hey we are SECULAR and BJP is communal
No quality of life, people want to eat other people, honesty , integrity, compassion, culture all exits in Amar Chitra Katha stories now-Hey we are SECULAR and BJP is communal
Well air is no dirty, no water, no system, so much of corruption, no jobs, people are doing slavery-Hey we are SECULAR and BJP Is communal
Common citizen is suffering, is paying taxes for what, atrocities by police, no healthcare, look at government hospitals-Hey we are SECULAR and BJP is communal
Terrorists are attacking, Taliban is taking over, they will make Indian just like Pakistan-Hey stop all this, remember we are SECULAR and BJP is communal.
Due to population Sir no Food to eat even-I already have US citizenship, keep playing on this tape recorder, yes Sir "We are SECULAR and BJP Is communal"
Re: Re: Left are fools
by RightSaid Fred on May 15, 2009 10:50 AM
When 70% of the Country says BJP is communal. you better believe. Don't keep barking the same old tune.
Re: Re: Re: Left are fools
by CongressCharSauBees on May 15, 2009 10:53 AM
But 100% of Indians agree that Congress is a 420 party and their lives are miserable due to the mis rule of the Congress since 1947.
Re: Re: Re: Left are fools
by vishal sharma on May 15, 2009 11:03 AM
If u speak in support of muslim you are secular and if u speak in support of Hindus you are communal... Think on this...
Re: Re: Re: Left are fools
by Jitesh Agrawal on May 15, 2009 10:55 AM
Where did you get the 70% figure from???? Dont read too many psuedo secular manifestos or you will be doomed.
Re: Re: Left are fools
by Oscar on May 15, 2009 10:51 AM
who are to blame for this , politicians not at all. Politicians speak only those language which makes a common man vote for him. and if people vote for them if they fight like this they are surely not to blame. Tommorrow if we vote for only those who consider development as only their motive then definitly it will make a change
Re: Left are fools
by shashidhar prasad on May 15, 2009 10:47 AM
I really dont care who comes to power by successfully manipulating the numbers. But at the end they should NOT say that we came together to keep communcal forces out..
Re: Re: Left are fools
by Jitesh Agrawal on May 15, 2009 10:57 AM
Then dont watch the TV any more because that is the "basis" of forming unholy alliances now...... no better then prosttitutes who sleep with anyone the only reason is money
Re: Re: Re: Left are fools
by giveanid on May 15, 2009 11:04 AM
Sour grapes.eh? The BJP has formed alliances with most parties in the fray in the past, from Karunanidhi to the Left
Re: Re: Re: Re: Left are fools
by Jitesh Agrawal on May 15, 2009 11:14 AM
BJP and left..... that shows how informed you are..... dont blabber here just for sake of it....... congress is behaving like true prostttitute talking to all and ready to go with anyone doenst matter if they fought elections against them and abused them
Why these CONG and some stupid parties roaring secular card when most riots happened in their time.
Why should we compromise growth, economy and national devlopment just for the sake of preserving our secular image?
Muslims in this country get enough good life than any other muslim dominated country in world. Still this so called UPA allies and Congress use them a vote bank. They are literally used. There pople don't even think about nation's devlopment while voting.
I seriously feel NDA should be given a power again. It was a far better government than the UPA one.
Re: Why not BJP then?
by giveanid on May 15, 2009 10:46 AM
Your "serious" feeling is perhaps not shared by the majority. They probably feel UPA did better for them.
Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by CongressCharSauBees on May 15, 2009 10:48 AM
That is where you are wrong, exit polls are bopkess, since 2005 we have had many state elections when did they prove accurate?
The result will be very shocking to you, the mood in the country is anti Congress.
Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by Magnolia Blossom on May 15, 2009 10:50 AM
Ya, considering the big number of illegal voters congress has created, we are not surprised.
Re: Why not BJP then?
by giveanid on May 15, 2009 10:45 AM
Riots happening is not the issue, but a government aiding, abetting or being passive is the crime. That is what Modi's govt did in Gujarat.
Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by shashidhar prasad on May 15, 2009 10:51 AM
What about Anti-Sikh riot..You know some thing about Kilaafat movement and what happened in India
Re: Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by giveanid on May 15, 2009 11:10 AM
Anti Sikh Riot: Congress apologised for it. The two leaders considered responsible were dropped, even of they were acquitted by several enquiry commissions. On the other hand, the man behind Gujarat is the CM of the place! That is the difference. Secondly,why would Congress kill Sikhs? They were not looking for anti-Sikh votes or galvanize Hindu votes or something. It was never on agenda. The killing happened in response to Indira's murder. It was wrong, and Congress has admitted it. What abt BJP?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by JGN on May 15, 2009 11:17 AM
So ki11ing just one person was enough for the Congis to ki11 more than 5000 Sikhs but there is no value for the life of one compartment full of passengers (mostly women and children)!!! Were they insects?? Who apologized? A lame-duck PM apologized to his own community for something which he did not do. The Congress President should have apologized. When the "two leaders were dropped? Only after a Sikh journalist threw his chappals at the HM!! What a great sacrifice made by OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL RENOUNCATION!!!!!
Re: Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by RightSaid Fred on May 15, 2009 10:53 AM
When there are riots, people suffer, the country suffers. This upper-hand lower-hand thinking exposes your sick mentality. In over 90% of cases, riots were fueled by fanatics from the either side. RSS has been a major culprit, history proves it. You cannot kill your own innocent people under the garb of being nationalistic. That's more dangerous than corruption or communism. Hence, at any cost we have to keep the divisive forces away and work for national unity.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by CongressCharSauBees on May 15, 2009 11:02 AM
Listen you believer, I know what riots are, I have seen them. The outcome is always decided on who had the upper hand. Then why are not the other riots being investigated a furiously as the guj 2002 riots? How many Musl1ms have volunteered to spill the beans on those other riots since 1947? NONE.... Stop playing the sympathy card, you are cutting a sorry figure.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by giveanid on May 15, 2009 11:12 AM
WHo told other riots are not investigated? Heard of Sri Krishna commission? Gujarat riot deserves special attention coz of the involvement of government.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by shashidhar prasad on May 15, 2009 10:58 AM
What do you know about RSS?.. Have you visited thier places once.. You know what kind of socail service they do ?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by manish kulkarni on May 15, 2009 11:04 AM
You just think of RSS. But there are lot of ohter agencies in this country which were used by congress too.
On what bases you claim that congress is not there in the divsive politics?
Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by JGN on May 15, 2009 10:48 AM
What was Congis doing during the Anti-Sikh riots? Rajiv Gandhi even justified the same in the name of "earth shaking when a big tree falls".
Re: Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by RightSaid Fred on May 15, 2009 10:57 AM
The anti-sikh riots were wrong, horribly wrong. But then, using the oft-repeated action-reaction pet theory of the chuddies, it was a reaction to brutal-murder of India's most admired Prime Minister, Mr.s Gandhi (whom even ABV praised at some point of time). Rajiv stated this because he saw his own mother fall to bullets.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by CongressCharSauBees on May 15, 2009 11:05 AM
If that is the case, then why did Rajiv not delay his becoming the PM, in view of the horrible carnage to begin with. He showed no remorse in becoming the PM, then. Compare this to Guj 2002, seen the amount of cases(50% are BS as per SC) filed against the Guj govt. You guys are plain sympathy seekers and nothing else.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by Jitesh Agrawal on May 15, 2009 11:09 AM
Most admired..... keep all that crap for yourself.
Killing 3000 innocents without provocation is not roits its is eth*nic cleansing without any provocation. What happened in guj was a reaction to adventurism result next 7 years havetn seen even a street fight in guj, forget about riots
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why not BJP then?
by JGN on May 15, 2009 11:19 AM
>>>>>>>The cold blooded murder of India's PM is not provocation enough?...............yes, but the Congis think that the life of one compartment full of passengers had no value as they were "H1ndus"!!!
It is high time that the Indian constituion, which has totally failed over the past 62 years, is scrapped and a fresh one keeping the aspirations of the people is framed. The constituion which was good for the time it was framed, has lived its life. We emulated the British system, but Britain itself does not have a written consititon. They go by conventions. This constitution has only helped promote individual interests, over national ones. For writing a new constitution, help of NGOs should be taken. This has been successfully done for UN constitution which was adapted from Rotary International's constitution. All political parties should be kept out of the committed for formation of a new constitution. Will our politicians agree to do this. I doubt.
Re: Indian Constitution.
by giveanid on May 15, 2009 10:49 AM
US has a written constutution and it has worked well for them. There are provisions to amend constitution. There restrictions to amend it are put in for a good reason. Or else, just like you, if a party felt the constitution is not giving them chance to be in power, they would amend it in whatever way they like. And might even amend so that the party with lesser seats must form govt. Or worse, that LK Advani decides who will form govt.
I think 2009 will give a solid signal to end the multiparty politics in India .Prediction of results are no more a easy game for any big or small political parties .Scientific and science has entered for counting of votes as well as results .Even now a days no body can conclude the body language of voters will bring vote for their party and candidate .people are intelegent enough to select candidate and party as per their performance .So I believe 2009 will give big parties a good no of seats for forming a stable Gov .All small parties will get very less seats and slowly they will either vanish or merged with big parties .Regarding left parties ,it is now clear that their numbers are numbered and no longer they represent peasants,farmers ,labour class and slowly they will be vanished from Indian democratic politics --West bengal will give the signal of ending left politics .Congress has become really old and lost their once spirits,morality ,spark and slowly becoming a party of Leader's choice but not by people choice .So that remains BJP as the only people's choice of party where 80% people remains one faith of choice since Ramayana and Mahabharat time .I imagin NDA will form next Gov ,it is sure .BJP has to go on people's line in future and no longer they can effort to push their wish or choice to people .People of India is total secular and no such hatred or vindictive nature in their heart .All religion lives in India very very peacefully and this the tradition of India
Re: Tradition of India
by anand mehta on May 15, 2009 10:59 AM
Yes we have to get out of this yadav parties, telgu party, dravid party, akali party, Muslim league, Biju party, Assam party, Goa party, Telangana party and so on. We badly need Indian Parties with clearly defined policies for the growth of the country and eradiation of poverty and illiteracy in all Indians belinging to all religions and categories. But for Hindutva agenda and differences on how Muslims should be brought in the main stream, BJP and Congress do not have much to choose. Today they are joined by all and sundry only to share power and do back-seat-driving. There is no alternative but have a mid term election and the young in India have to agitate for Indian parties only.
Re: Re: Tradition of India
by abboral boral on May 15, 2009 11:11 AM
The basic fabric of all Indians are religioustic in nature so Party cannot ignore the people's such mind .We have seen enough politics last 60 years as how political parties used this people's mind to divide in different caste ,creed ,religion ,regionalism etc for their own gain only .Still 70% people live in rural India remains unattended by these parties and so no development took place in this very real rural India .At present scenerion No big party dare to break and divide this basic fabric of Indian people .BJP or Congress or Janata Dal must learn now or never
Re: Tradition of India
by giveanid on May 15, 2009 10:50 AM
wow! Lets not wait for results, just invite Advani to form govt. After all we know better than those ignorant people who cast their votes, right?
Re: Re: Tradition of India
by CongressCharSauBees on May 15, 2009 10:54 AM
That would be better, India today needs a seasoned POLITICIAN like Advani at the helm, not some Sonia appointed junkie who is just warming the seat for that Twat Rahul.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Tradition of India
by CongressCharSauBees on May 15, 2009 11:03 AM
No our plan is simple, Advani ( 2009 to 14) and then Narendra Modi (2014 to 19).
Re: Re: Tradition of India
by abboral boral on May 15, 2009 10:53 AM
India will remain democratic but all small parties will be vanished even India will remain 4 to 5 party system I am sure
This is a worst political period India is facing after 1996 when all crooks grouped together to form a Govt at centre and went on screwing the country for 1.5 years and 2 Prime Ministers and several guys working as acting PMs.
Hope the results are decisive and these kingmakers bite the dust. If this does not happen, one should prepare for tough days ahead.
India should celebrate the victory of good (political parties other than BJP) over evil (BJP) by burning Ravana's effigy like we do on dussehra. Effigies of Ravana Advani, Kumbakarna Naidu and Megnadh Modi should be burnt all over India day after tomorrow.
Re: Burn Ravan's effigy to celebrate BJP's loss
by shashidhar prasad on May 15, 2009 10:41 AM
Yeah...Some people conducted Bandh when Saddam Hussien was hanged and kept quiet when Mumbai was burning. when I think you belong to this category
Re: Burn Ravan's effigy to celebrate BJP's loss
by Rk Sharma on May 15, 2009 10:39 AM
Indian politician speaks to one of his slave, another slum dog, i wonder why elections are held, we always win, questions are standard and our response is also standard.
Their are no roads- We are Secular and BJP is communal
Population is 116 crore, it will be soon 150 crore-Hey we are SECULAR and BJP is communal
No quality of life, people want to eat other people, honesty , integrity, compassion, culture all exits in Amar Chitra Katha stories now-Hey we are SECULAR and BJP is communal
Well air is no dirty, no water, no system, so much of corruption, no jobs, people are doing slavery-Hey we are SECULAR and BJP Is communal
Common citizen is suffering, is paying taxes for what, atrocities by police, no healthcare, look at government hospitals-Hey we are SECULAR and BJP is communal
Terrorists are attacking, Taliban is taking over, they will make Indian just like Pakistan-Hey stop all this, remember we are SECULAR and BJP is communal.
Due to population Sir no Food to eat even-I already have US citizenship, keep playing on this tape recorder, yes Sir "We are SECULAR and BJP Is communal"
Re: Re: Burn Ravan's effigy to celebrate BJP's loss
by Jitesh Agrawal on May 15, 2009 10:44 AM
We are doomed, the thought process of common Indian is totally bereft of constructive thinking and nationalist feelings. Indians take pleasure in either wasting all of their time watching criket or discussing politics 365 days a year but no where do they realise that in all this we are destroying ourselves.
Smaller countries have got policies and governance to develop and get a good quality of life and here we are divided to core on caste, creed, region, religion, language and what not and dancing to policies made by crooks, goonda and scoundrels politicians who dont have any agenda other then to get power and loot public
Re: Burn Ravan's effigy to celebrate BJP's loss
by KALKI on May 15, 2009 10:45 AM
LONG TIME AGO WHEN ALEXANDER INVADED INDIA A KING BY THE NAME OF AMBHI SIDED WITH ALEXANDER AGAINST PURU.BHARAT SONI IS LIKE AMBHI.HE WILL SIDE WITH PAKIS AND MUZZIES AGAINST HIS OWN HINDU BRETHREN.THIS IS WHY A SMALL LIL COUNTRY LIKE ENGLAND RULED OVER THE VAST INDIAN SUBCONTINENT BECAOZ WE ARE INFESTED WITH SONIS. JAI HIND.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Burn Ravan's effigy to celebrate BJP's loss
by Krishnan on May 15, 2009 10:47 AM
Secular parties lick the feet of minortiy political parties, have alliance with them, silently encourage conversion and still they are secular
Re: Burn Ravan's effigy to celebrate BJP's loss
by indian tiger on May 15, 2009 10:50 AM
only ravan in this country is you , who thinks like this, you should be burnt ......
Congress party has openly dumped its own existing allies in RJD/LJP in Bihar to woo Nitish Kumar. In TN they are making overtures to Jayalalitha of AIADMK the sworn enemy of Karuna's DMK. Congress might even bring down the DMK government in TN to appease Jayalalitha.
The Congress is openly saying" IF JAYALALITHA GETS MORE THEN 25 SEATS, DUMP DMK AND GO AFTER HER, IF NITISH GETS MORE THEN 20 SEATS DUMP LALOO AND PASWAN AND GO AFTER NITISH".
So, why should anybody trust the Congress?
Especially, Jaya and Nitish, Congress could do this on them too.
No wonder Nitish and Chandrababu Naidu have flatly refused to even talk to the Congress, Jaya amma is maintaining safe distance.
Congress is the most greedy and selfish party in India.
Re: Congress is 420
by Rk Sharma on May 15, 2009 10:42 AM
I also want to become minister , how easy it will be i will sit in office and exploit nation's wealth for 5 years, when terms gets over i will go out and Say i am SECULAR, i will put few Hindus or still ironically so called majority( Although what is condition of Hindus in India, everybody knows) in jail or something like that, wow so easy for me, than i will also go to place like Amethi and say why do you vote for Rahul gandhi, people will act like slaves and shout because Rahul baba works for us (God knows where is the work done by Congress in last 60 years, but i liked their style, keep country poor and slave and rule them). I will be so happy as a minister i can rule 116 crore slaves and soon it will be 150 crores, my God people will try to run from India, only as a minister i will stay. Guys please let me know how to enter into politics and rule slaves and collect wealth for my coming generation. Well two things i know, i have to say i am SECULAR and BJP is COMMUNAL, so give some other advise, apart from these two what else i should do.
Thanks to all my country men who will help me in becoming minister in advance
