Discussion Board

DMK promises homeland for Lankan Tamils


Total 623 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20   Older >   >>
padman
what is difference between india and PAK?
by padman on May 07, 2009 11:20 AM

indian tamilan also support for seperate country for tamilian in srinkland and pak in kashmir.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
N Rajendran
Eelam
by N Rajendran on May 07, 2009 11:18 AM  | Hide replies

Guys,
Eelam was Srilankan Tamils home land for more than thousands and thousands of years. During British rule it was made together with Shngala Srilanka for better administration. The when they left they gave independance as one country (Sri Lanka). Tamils are fighting for the injustice, genocide & dominations made by the majority Shigala community. Do understand this before putting your comments against SL Tamils.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Guest
Re: Eelam
by Guest on May 07, 2009 11:28 AM
I am not against the SL Tamils. But this Eelam is dangerous nonsense. How do you propose it will survive? Who will guarantee it?
Think, I personally feel that with sustained pressure the Sinhala's will be compelled to fall in line and give equal rights to Tamils.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
vsgiri
EELAM
by vsgiri on May 07, 2009 11:17 AM  | Hide replies

If Bangladesh could be created with the help of India why not EELAM for SL tamils. Tamil Dravidians Hindu are the original inhabitants of Ilangai( Ceylon) later came to be known as SL.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
DMK Buster
Re: EELAM
by DMK Buster on May 07, 2009 11:29 AM
Bangladesh was created to partially neutralise Pakistan. Srilanka is not a threat to India and therefore creation of Eelam does not serve any purpose. Eelam, if created, can eventually fall into the hands of anti-India elements like Pakistan or China. As long as India does not support division of Srilanka, they will not allow any anti-India activities on their soil. That is the unwritten political agreement.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Indian Citizen
Re: Re: EELAM
by Indian Citizen on May 07, 2009 12:01 PM
You are right, MMK. India should be away from this petrol Bomb. No politician should interfere and promise like a king for votes in TN. It can trigger lot of unwanted issues later.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dhananjaya ST
no
by Dhananjaya ST on May 07, 2009 11:16 AM  | Hide replies

India must not interfere in the internal matters of lanka..the tamils there are citizens of that nation.let them sort out their problems...why are tamilnadu politicians promising the moon for people of some other country?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
PRAKASH NAIR
Re: no
by PRAKASH NAIR on May 07, 2009 11:27 AM
WHY U INTERFERE ANY GUJARATIS ATTACKED AT DURBAN. WHY U SUPPORT SURBOJEET SINGH YOU BEG TO IDIOT PAKISTANIS. WHY U RELEASED TERRORIST AT THE TIME OF KHANDAHAR DRAMA.
PLS CHECK YOUR MIND. WHY U SUPPORT DALAI LAMA. WHY U INTERFERE TO BANGLADESH AT 1971. NO REPLY. ONCE UPON A TIME TAMIL RAJAS RULING OUR COUNTRY. THIS TAMILIANS LIVING AT MORE THAN 1000 DECADES VERIFY HISTROY. FIRST THEN SIT IN FRONT OF COMPUTER.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dhananjaya ST
Re: Re: no
by Dhananjaya ST on May 07, 2009 11:29 AM
talk about todays problem man..dont go into prehistoric times and create trouble everywhere.Your raja was using bullock and elephants to travel..why dont u do the same?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
DMK Buster
Re: no
by DMK Buster on May 07, 2009 11:23 AM
Yes, you are right. Dravidian politicians who promise the moon mean nothing. These are mere political statements to appease the voters as this karunadi character has no other issue in the elections. His statement has no value. Central Govt of India does not endorse every dumb statement made by this karunadi. More than the Srilankan Tamil issue, India's national security is more important. It is certainly not in India's interest to support Tamil issue or to kiss LTTE. What can LTTE do for us other than being a nuisance?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vandiyadevan
Re: no
by Vandiyadevan on May 07, 2009 11:20 AM
For the same reasons 'Bangladesh' created and for the same reasons we worry about 'Sikhs' in SWAT valley.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dhananjaya ST
Re: Re: no
by Dhananjaya ST on May 07, 2009 11:23 AM
why dont u go to fight alongside your terrorist brothers in lanka..?..sitting comfortably here in india u guys want to speak about goddamn eelam

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sriram Rags
Re: Re: Re: no
by Sriram Rags on May 07, 2009 11:25 AM
So why dont you go and fight the Paki's when they attacked Mumbai. Why dont you fight Raj Thackrey when he attacked Biharis. Why crib in Forums like this.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Vandiyadevan
Re: Re: Re: no
by Vandiyadevan on May 07, 2009 11:26 AM
LTTE and problem of Srilankan Tamils are two different issues. You and me, the common person in the street, should not talk like politicians.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dhananjaya ST
Re: Re: Re: Re: no
by Dhananjaya ST on May 07, 2009 11:27 AM
the problem is not the tamil civilian.It is the LTTE which is opposed to peace and is bent upon making life miserable for the innocent tamil population there.There was no trouble before LTTE was formed

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vandiyadevan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: no
by Vandiyadevan on May 07, 2009 11:32 AM
You are wrong. Freedom movement started in 1950s in SriLanka. LTTE came in to picture much later. They gained popularity in early 80s due to step-motherly treatment of Tamils by Sinhala majority.

Forward   |   Report abuse
Dhananjaya ST
Re: Re: Re: Re: no
by Dhananjaya ST on May 07, 2009 11:38 AM
i speak not of freedom struggle but of terrorism in lanks

   Forward   |   Report abuse
B M
Re: Re: no
by B M on May 07, 2009 11:24 AM
Bangladesh was not created because of any love for Bangladeshis. It was a shrewd political move since it was not in India's interest to have borders with Pakistan on both east and west. By carving out Bangladesh, we eliminated the threat of a Paki border on the east. With Srilanka, we have no such threat. Indian Tamils are Indians, SL Tamils are Srilankans, not Indians. No need to bother about them.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Vandiyadevan
Re: Re: Re: no
by Vandiyadevan on May 07, 2009 11:41 AM
If you think Bangaladesh and Srilanka are our friendly neighbours, we have nothing to say.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
B M
Re: no
by B M on May 07, 2009 11:20 AM
Yes. Specially this senile di@khead should be put in a boat and sent to Srilanka. Let him fight for Eelam on the Srilankan soil.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 623 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20   Older >   >>
Write a message