It is disgusting that inspite of so many years the amethi is still as it is {as mentioned above "village squares and corner roads, between mud-packed houses and grain sheaves, milch cows and children "}. Amethi sent Soniya ,Rajeev,Indira, Rahul to Lok sabha. But why these powerfull MP's could not make Amethi as model constituency in the India. Probbaly answer could be Indians do not deserve for this. very sorry..
Re: I thought that amethi by Now would have been No -1 in Country
by saugoto Banerjee on Apr 21, 2009 09:43 AM
rahul will be defeated this time in amethi
Re: I thought that amethi by Now would have been No -1 in Country
by indianheart on Apr 21, 2009 09:17 AM
Because Amethi people are stupid and uneducated. They still think that they are living in the times of kings and queens. Sonia is queen And Rahul is prince. They worship Gandhi dynasty. They dont know about democracy and how to exercise it.
Congress likes to keep it that way. If level of quality of education in India rises, then people would not vote for dyansty or stupid things like religion.
So they let Amethi as it is. Let the fools vote them.
Re: Re: I thought that amethi by Now would have been No -1 in Cou
by J Chandrasekhar on Apr 21, 2009 09:21 AM
Indira after several surveys has finalised some constituencies like raebareli, amethi and Bellary etc. Look today Bellary is totally changed, a day for total turn around is not far
Re: Slave dynasty
by indianheart on Apr 21, 2009 09:19 AM
MMS us a weak selfish person like most other congressmen. He wants chair thats all. Nothing else matters. Whether people live or die.
India is not democracy, cartels/mafia give mp/mla tickets who elects the cartel appointed PM. WHERE IS DEMOCRACY. Only direct election by people of PM is democracy. Election funded by government body, not mafia. Direct impeachment by people, that is democracy. INDIA HAS NO DEMOCRACY. For a change, we need Dalit PM from BSP, this is short term solution. No BJP-Congress nexus and buyout of small parties.
Re: anoop sh - Dynasty rule in India
by menda vijaya on Apr 21, 2009 09:08 AM
It appears that you are in sort of shock.Or you might have attended some indian taliban school of late. Kindly wake up from the stupor.Thanks.
Re: Re: anoop sh - Dynasty rule in India
by D S on Apr 21, 2009 09:13 AM
it is called swat valley,,, don't be surprised if election voting machines are rigged by big parties. Anything wrong is possible in India.
Re: Re: anoop sh - Dynasty rule in India
by J Chandrasekhar on Apr 21, 2009 09:12 AM
menda vijaya,
obviously you are sold out to a sack of rice and converted. living on the benefits of reservations and enjoying and yet cursing others for all the benefits you got
bekar hai, this article has started with single and biased intention. The simples way to compare two reli--gion is just compare the populations of two communities, their approach to humanity, peace, behavior and their records of viol-ence in history.. to become great you dont have to go trhu literatures, you have to be intelligent and think simply and logically... when u compare buddism with mslim, just see the nature of two communities.. forget buddism, even non-reli--ligi_on ppl have better understanding abt humanity.... see the world with open eyes.. u will come to know who's God or messenger has left better message to become a good human being
Why congress people never speak about his dadaji but alway say his nanaji was Nehru?
His dadaji's name was Nawaj Knan a grocer from Gujrat whose wife was parsi. Indira got married with his son Firoze Knan in london in a mosc. Rajic converted himself Parsi in italy became & Roberto, Rahul's original name is Raul & priyan ka's is Binanca. I don't know from where they obtain surname Gandhi. Gandhi isn't a parsi surname or muslim & this truth they are hidinig from years. They feel shame for telling they that they are parsi or muslim & call themself secular LOL...
Re: Do you know what was the name of Rajiv's dadaji?
by indianheart on Apr 21, 2009 09:08 AM
You have hit the nail on the head!!! The are wolves inside sheep skin.
Re: Re: Do you know what was the name of Rajiv's dadaji?
by Eye Opener on Apr 21, 2009 09:13 AM
One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather (nanaji) was Pandit Nehru. But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal (dadaji) and the maternal (nanaji) grandfathers.
In fact, the paternal (dadaji) grandfather is deemed to be the more important grandfather in most societies.
Why is it then, nowhere, we find Rajiv Gandhi's paternal (dadaji) grandfather' s name? It appears that the reason is simply. Rajiv Gandhi's paternal (dadaji) grandfather was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujarat .
This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam.
This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. Rajiv's father Feroze, was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru's wishes.
Feroze's mother's family name was Ghandy, often associated with Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi, sometime before his wedding with Indira, by an affidavit.
Re: Do you know what was the name of Rajiv's dadaji?
by RAJMOHAN NAIR on Apr 21, 2009 09:14 AM
Also Sanjay's (another of son of Indira) father is Mohammed Yunus.
Re: Re: Do you know what was the name of Rajiv's dadaji?
by Eye Opener on Apr 21, 2009 09:19 AM
thats true, I am not against muslim just want to know from where they obtain Gandhi surname? Does they feel shame to tell that they are parsi or muslim & call themself secular LOL...
Re: Re: Re: Do you know what was the name of Rajiv's dadaji?
by Seenu D on Apr 21, 2009 09:38 AM
well..afaik..M.K Gandhi gave his surname to Indira's husband..so tht Nehru cud accept his son-in-law.. not sure abt this theory by believable..coz Gandhi and Nehru were alway hand in glove...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you know what was the name of Rajiv's dadaji?
by Eye Opener on Apr 21, 2009 09:42 AM
& thats why they hide this story & feel shame to tell they are muslim. I'm not against muslim but against these so called Gandhi family coz inspite of all this they say they are secular.
Re: Do you know what was the name of Rajiv's dadaji?
by menda vijaya on Apr 21, 2009 09:12 AM
Thanks for the latest story. Your history is more interesting than fiction. Please write more about it. Why are you worried about parsi. You mention the word parsi as if it is some sort of venom. My dear sir, just look around what you are using every day in your life.There will be some thing to do with a parsi, for example the bus you ride, the steel spoon you use, the sugar you eat. All came from Parsi. Why that, the Ashoka lions were influenced by parsi design(iranian) So forget about parsi matters. Be happy what you have got.There are many things that you would never understand.
Re: Re: Do you know what was the name of Rajiv's dadaji?
by Eye Opener on Apr 21, 2009 09:15 AM
I am not against muslim or parsi. I just want to know why these so called Gandhi's are hiding truth, does they feel shame to tell that they are parsi or muslim blood. And they say they are secular LOL...
Re: Re: Re: Do you know what was the name of Rajiv's dadaji?
by Eye Opener on Apr 21, 2009 09:17 AM
I have some realy good culttured muslim friends also... All Muslims are not terrorist But how can I ignore that But 99.99% terrorist in world are Muslims.
What the hell should Indians bother about the opinions of members of a family that shamelessly and clandestinely adorns a title ( Gandhi) which the father of the nation bore ? The Nehru family members could aptly have been 'gandis' which Firose was. This bunch of tricksters are instead 'dressing in borrowed robes'. Will any ordinary Indian be so short of self-respect as to give up ones true title and adopt another just to gain respectability ?
Re: Who cares?
by menda vijaya on Apr 21, 2009 09:14 AM
Just as you expressed your viewsthrough this internet, they also have a right to say what they want to say. They always said good things. They never preached hatred. They are not communal. They are good people. So what is is your problem.
Re: Re: Who cares?
by Rajan Thomas on Apr 21, 2009 10:02 AM
They were good people? So good as to keep the entire opposition in jail for two years from 1975 till the people of India threw these 'good people' out t in the next election.
I was not a supporter of BJP, but after seeing the run for minority votes by Cong, SP, RJD, Commies etc, I got the feeling that when every one thinks about the minorities what about a party that thinks about majority hindus in this country. The more I am going through LK, I have developed an interest in him and also respect for his boldness and independent thinking. I think, today India needs a person like LKA and a party that cares for its deprived majority
Re: Shri Advani
by deepak yadav on Apr 21, 2009 09:00 AM
India have no minority...18 Cr people are muslims...even many country dont hav the population of 18 Cr. This minority can not be neglected in any case..20% population of india can not be neglected....and 80% population has the responsibility to take care themself and backward and poor minority also.
Re: Re: Shri Advani
by J Chandrasekhar on Apr 21, 2009 09:04 AM
I am surprised, you are also taliking like your cousins Lalu amd Mallu. What kind of responsibility you own for ppl who impose their superstitions on others. Those who are responsible for their own life style of misery and dark age living? Why do they deny equal rights to their women? Why do they send their kids to madarasas? Why do they indulge in subversive activities? The questions atre endless
Re: Shri Advani
by menda vijaya on Apr 21, 2009 09:19 AM
Minorities are those people who does not require a brahmin to order their daily life and even death rituals. So many indians who are living under slavery of brahmins under the name of this God and that God think that others are fools.This world is not owned by religious fanatics. Any one can reach slavation through any way he likes. It is not necessary that one has to go to brahmin to go to God. This is what troubling those people who were ruling this country by proxy. With those people who does not believe in brahmin rituals, they find lot of problems. They can stand their presence even if they belong to this land and country. My dear, every one a a right to live , right toexpression and right to religion.Just because they dont belong to slavery of brahmans like you, they are not to be hated , the way you are doing.As of votes, with the kind of people like you around, they have no choice but to vote for Congress which does not preach hatred and which is not communal.
Religion only reflects the culture and roots of that person. god exist in our mind and heart only. what we do is relection of our culture and nothing else. Being a Hindu i feel, i have inherited modesty and softness , may be thats the reason Hindu's are not able to stand together. But time has come we need to change ourself and stand together for your better future
Re: Religion has no meaning
by Eye Opener on Apr 21, 2009 08:58 AM
Do you know what was the name of Rajiv's dadaji?
His name was Nawaj Knan a grocer from Gujrat whose wife was parsi.
Indira got married with his son Firoze Knan in london in a mosc.
Rajic converted himself Parsi in italy became & Roberto, Rahul's original name is Raul & priyan ka's is Binanca. I don't know from where they obtain surname Gandhi. Gandhi isn't a parsi surname or muslim & this truth they are hidinig from years. They feel shame for telling they that they are parsi or muslim & call themself secular LOL...
Expopse the pseudo secular forces. One more question: If we are secular, why we have "missionary" visa as a category of visas? I think India is the only non-Christian country to have this in the world. It is high time to have a relook into this.
Re: Re: missionary category visa
by menda vijaya on Apr 21, 2009 09:27 AM
If you are writing this in english in this internet the foundation was laid by the missioneries. They have started India's first universities in Mumbai, Delhi and Kolkata. It is their selfless service that made this country proud in many ways.As Indians they too feel proud. No has the right to take away their heritage of this great land.Christians came to India in AD 52.What is their population now? If you think they are so huge, the number should have been atleast 50 crores by now. It is fanatic brahmans who preach against them. Becuase the religion does not require proprietory rights of brahmans. That is why every day tey try to put venom in the minds of others.It is a pity. And no one can destroy christians. No matter how many were burnt,raped, ruined, tortured one can not succeed in this. Many have tried and gone out into thin air without trace. What is happening today to christians is only hatred from slaves of brahmins.Nothing else. Christians never interfered in the matters of others. But they face intereference every day in their lives from the people who think it is great to abuse christians.But Christinas would never hate them. Try and try. They wont hit you back. They suffer and keep quiet.
Re: Re: Re: missionary category visa
by rajaneesh sar on Apr 21, 2009 08:47 AM
i belong to orissa , please come to orissa i will show you how poverty is exploited by missionaries to convert them
Re: Re: Re: Re: missionary category visa
by V S on Apr 21, 2009 09:00 AM
and what have hindus done for the poor ? why are there poor in the first place to be exploited so easily ?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: missionary category visa
by Jay on Apr 21, 2009 09:09 AM
The question of bringing what has been done to them is to be first asked to the Congress which ruled for most of the 61 years since independence. First conversion is not the answer to solve their problems. Secondly, evangelization thorough money power can not be easily resisted by all religions. If money was the only issue, there will be no difference between religion and IPL, where you can buy players if you have money. Time to think for a peaceful and positive solution.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: missionary category visa
by Manoj Gupta on Apr 21, 2009 09:06 AM
ur fellow hindus, huh...what religion do you belong to deepak yadav?
