Re: She looks and behaves like a guy
by RG on Apr 21, 2009 11:25 AM
Bika ndTV & Associates ..cheap barkha,jesu pronoy and badbudar dua r getting hefty suums on daily basis to spread Cong(Itly) italian shit on all their chneels daily... but even now they r fearing that Cong(Itly) cannot cross 89 this time..
These two are the symbol of corruption and casteism practiced for 60 years, These two are the guardian of looted money deposited in swiss bank, The two are symbol of corruption and immorality in indian politics. Then why don't they give a chance to their conscious and leave the politics. To Guard 20000 crore of corrupt money inRajiv foundation Sonia is in politics, They are the evill guarding the looted wealth.
Re: She is smarter than her moronic brother.
by RG on Apr 21, 2009 11:05 AM
..but she is a meen that appears only once is 5 yrs...assts also get depreciated..
Re: Fact about Nehru -Gandhi Dynasty
by sultan bhatt on Apr 21, 2009 10:28 AM
was changed to Gandhi, sometime before his wedding with Indira, by an affidavit.
The fact of the matter is that (and this fact can be found in many writings) Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan University by Guru Dev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, the lonely girl was all by herself, while father Jawahar was busy with politics, pretty women and illicit s**; the mother was in hospital. Feroze Khan, the grocer's son was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she changed her religion, became a Muslim woman and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque. Nehru was not happy; Kamala was dead already or dying. The news of this marriage eventually reached one Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Gandhi urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young man to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion, from Islam to Hinduism for instance. It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi.
The surprising thing is that the apostle of truth, the old man soon to be declared India's Mahatma and the 'Father of the Nation' didn't mention this game of his in the famous book, 'My Experiments with Truth'. Why? When they returned to India, a mock 'Vedic marriage' was instituted for public consumption. On this subject, writes M.O. Mathai (a longtime private secretary of Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GO
Re: Re: Fact about Nehru -Gandhi Dynasty
by sultan bhatt on Apr 21, 2009 10:29 AM
Nehru was no less a player in producing illicit offsprings. At least one case is very graphically described by M. O. Mathai in his "Reminiscences of the Nehru Age", page 206. Mathai writes: "In the autumn of 1948 (India became free in 1947 and a great deal of work needed to be done) a young woman from Benares arrived in New Delhi as a sanyasin named Shraddha Mata (an assumed and not a real name). She was a Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology. People, including MPs, thronged to her to hear her discourses. One day S. D. Upadhyaya, Nehru's old employee, brought a letter in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM's house. As she departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that she was young, shapely and beautiful. Meetings with her became rather frequent, mostly after Nehru finished his work at night. During one of! Nehru's visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there, and Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply; and she visited Nehru at midnight... Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared.
In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said that a young woman from northern India arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars about herself. She left the convent as soon as she was well enough to move out but left the child b
OUt of 34 states only Maharashtra,Gujrat,Karnataka,Madhya Pradesh,Punjab,Rajsthan r developed. but that also only before 5-10 years. The main reason only the rulers were non congress or BJP. In time 1998-2004 when NDA ruled check the statistics of developement,is 50% more than what ever done in 50 years. BUt again after that the graph collapsed. Congress wants keep all people illeterate by that this Gandhi family can rule more the years. So they are blaming Other parties as communal. Congress is the origin of diffrentian,seperataranism,sectarism. So kick out Gandhi family(congrassian only). VOTE Varun...n... BJP
Afzal Guru is patriot , Baghat Singh/Sadvi are terrorist Afzal Guru ko maafi Sadvi ko faansi Allah is god ,Ram is fictional character. SIMI ,IM are social service org ,RSS,VHP are terror org. Kerala CPM declared 4000RS pension for madrsaa teachres from temple funds genocide of tamils= srilanka's internal problem Great sivaraj patil compares azfal hanging with common Indian (Sabarjit singh ) in pak. Afzal is human ,Sabarjit is traitor.
Godra Train carnage is accident ,gujarat riots are preplanned . 15% muslims are human ,85% hindus are insects. Supporting Majority (80 crores hindus) is Communal ,20 crores muslims are minority (lol population of USA) Malegaon blasts are only blasts ,other blasts are not at all blasts ,just they are diwali crackers.
5 muslims died in malegaon are important ,1000s died in other blasts are not important.
reservations for muslims ,bomb blasts for hindus.
crores of money for Haj pilgrims, nothing for amarnath pilgrims ,allotting 2 acres land in kashmir is blunder.
supporting islamic terrorist is secularism ,killing Indians is patriotism .
babri masjid is issue(which is actually a ram temple) , 100's of hindu temples demolished that is development.
If muslims die it is killing ,if hindu dies it is fate.
Hindus should follow rules ,muslims no need to obey common civil code.
Re: According to Congress
by srinivasan mv on Apr 21, 2009 12:27 PM
Why, even Valmiki was terrorist or thief (quote by Karunanidhi) Rama did not build Sethu Bridge (Stated by Congress and Karunanidhi) Rama was a drunkard (stated by Karunanidhi) If you allow these people to talk like this, they will doubt our mothers and fathers.
Re: According to Congress
by paresh chhabra on Apr 21, 2009 10:27 AM
Well said eve, you have really opened the innings in style. I wish these facts could work as eye openers for all hindus. one malegaon and now we hear a term like "HINDU TERRORISTS" and our great leaders and stupid media supports it in publicizing.
Re: Re: According to Congress
by srinivasan mv on Apr 21, 2009 12:29 PM
First Priority for Muslims. Hindus get out of the country. Convert all Hindus to Christanity. If not, call them terrorists.
Re: According to Congress
by Eye Opener on Apr 21, 2009 10:15 AM
When muslims do terrorism they say terrorist don't have religon. When Malegaon blast case comes they say it's Hindu terrorist. Why two rules?
I have been watching Priyanka for last 2-3 years & I strongly feel that she is not serious about politics. We get a feeling that she meets people just for fun & she is least bothered about their problems. This is very serious coz i think politics is a serious business.
Priyanka is not Gandhi,but is carrying the name title for election only. Even the family is from UP and ruled all sixty years our country,why UP is not developed? Why UPians encroacxhing Maharashtra,Punjab & other rich states? These peoples are doing anything for money. Now Priyanka has married Crist(converted). So dont VOTE Congress VOTE for BJP
