The Mumbai episode was an attack on India which the Govt failed to face promptly and expediciously. For more than 12 hours, Mumbai witnessed an unprecedented sight of death and destruction.This was a very painful outcome of highly indecisive, mentally paralysed Governments both at the State and Central levels.The handling of the situation during the subsequent 48 hours were equally atrocious.The Govt at the Centre failed to realise that it was a blatant agression on our souvereignty and deserved to be responded at least equally ferociously if not more. If some Americans had not been killed in the attack, MMS and his colleagues would have been persuading Pakistan (and I repeat persuading) even now to at least accept that the planning was done in their soil. While 180 innocent lives, many of them our guests from abroad, were lost in Mumbai attack, in the Kandhar episode 180 innocent lives were saved. Also there was no loss of property in the Kandhar episode whereas thousands of crores of property were damaged or lost. There is absolutely no comparison and it is simply unfortunate that the PM of our country is patting his own back and simultaneously the Gandhi - parivar - Sonia, Rahul and Priyanka (and may be Priyanka's children) - have joined the corus to pat PM's back for this debacle, for which a parallel can be drawn only with Chinese agression.
Re: The conspicuous difference between Kandhar and Mumbai episode
by surendra on Apr 15, 2009 08:43 AM
But what happened in Kargil, when Advani was the Home Minister andalso Dy. P.M.
In how many months BJP Govt. was taking to cick out the terrorists from Kargil ?
Re: Re: The conspicuous difference between Kandhar and Mumbai epi
by Indian on Apr 15, 2009 09:18 AM
Surendra bhai, Kargil was a bold step taken by BJP. If Cong were at power, we would never had a Kargil war. Inki phat jati hai war-se.
And you have seen BJP in power only for 5 years in which they brought down the interest rates, maintained the inflation under control, gave a good gradual relief to the taxpayers and created a congenial environment for industrial growth on which Cong rode their success from 2004 to 2008. But after 26/11 what has Cong done? The same Manmohan Singh declared that within next 100 days his govt would set up a strong Anti-Terror Law. What happened to that? Or maybe he meant 100 days from 2020.
Therefore my friend, please don't go by the false claims of Cong. They are the biggest enemies of our country. Now Priyanka has already started saying the Rahul would be a good PM. PM ka kursi kya unke baap ka raaj hai? Who should decide the PM? The Nehru-Gandhi family or us?
You can show your power to them by voting for BJP.
Re: Re: Lol
by Indian on Apr 15, 2009 09:18 AM
Dear middle finger, Kargil was a bold step taken by BJP. If Cong were at power, we would never had a Kargil war. Inki phat jati hai war-se.
And you have seen BJP in power only for 5 years in which they brought down the interest rates, maintained the inflation under control, gave a good gradual relief to the taxpayers and created a congenial environment for industrial growth on which Cong rode their success from 2004 to 2008. But after 26/11 what has Cong done? The same Manmohan Singh declared that within next 100 days his govt would set up a strong Anti-Terror Law. What happened to that? Or maybe he meant 100 days from 2020.
Therefore my friend, please don't go by the false claims of Cong. They are the biggest enemies of our country. Now Priyanka has already started saying the Rahul would be a good PM. PM ka kursi kya unke baap ka raaj hai? Who should decide the PM? The Nehru-Gandhi family or us?
You can show your power to them by voting for BJP.
Mr.Malhotra, if BJP has any sense then you will take up Manmohan Singh's communal speech,which has really communal and appeasing elements of Muslims to the election commission and supreme court. Let those bloudy congressis learn a lesson. they have belittled Hindus and Hinduism enough. Let them bite dust.. the shameless Vatricanists.
Re: Sonia and MMS are anti-Hindu
by surendra on Apr 15, 2009 08:50 AM
BJP is "virus" in India, who poisoned people of India in Castism and Communilism and Religion. People of India now kills this virus for ever from India, in this election.
This is the country of Mahatama Gandhi, not of JINNAH, whom Advani praised.
India is country of different-different type of casts, community , religions and culture. And all sections of people were work together for development of our nation. This is our strength.
Re: Re: Sonia and MMS are anti-Hindu
by Indian on Apr 15, 2009 09:19 AM
Surendra bhai, Kargil was a bold step taken by BJP. If Cong were at power, we would never had a Kargil war. Inki phat jati hai war-se.
And you have seen BJP in power only for 5 years in which they brought down the interest rates, maintained the inflation under control, gave a good gradual relief to the taxpayers and created a congenial environment for industrial growth on which Cong rode their success from 2004 to 2008. But after 26/11 what has Cong done? The same Manmohan Singh declared that within next 100 days his govt would set up a strong Anti-Terror Law. What happened to that? Or maybe he meant 100 days from 2020.
Therefore my friend, please don't go by the false claims of Cong. They are the biggest enemies of our country. Now Priyanka has already started saying the Rahul would be a good PM. PM ka kursi kya unke baap ka raaj hai? Who should decide the PM? The Nehru-Gandhi family or us?
You can show your power to them by voting for BJP.
Release of terrorists, bailing out sailors giving a lot of money, etc etc are happening all over. The shameful thing was Jaswant Singh chaperoning Islamists.. Other than that, BJP's stance on the terrorism is no worse than Sonia Maino's Mr.Q connection,the Bofors money deal,the escape of M.Q and the fund allowance of Mr. Q by the CBI (Charity Bureau of Indira Cons)..It's now worse than Rajiv's silence and nod of Sikh massacre.
There was no choice but to release the terrorists to save the passengers. What would have Mr. Manmohan Singh done if he were the decision-maker then? The plane was inside a state that was inimical to India and separated from India by another enemy state, that is Pakistan. There was no way that a commando attack could have been launched to rescue the passengers. If it were attempted, the passengers and the commandos would have surely been lost. There was no convenient safe base where the rescuing force could have returned without opposition. Even if in some way the commandos were transported across Pak without Pak coming to know of it and landed at Kandahar, and had they succeeded in rescuing all the passengers, a-la Entebbe, their return to India could not have been hidden and Pak would have never allowed them to be flown back to India across Pak airspace. The international incident of Indian forces entering Afghanistan with violent intent would have invited strong reaction from every country. India was one of those who voted to condemn Israel in the UN post-Entebbe, and congress ruled here then, I think. But, Congress could have contemplated such sacrifice of several passengers for the greater glory of the dynasty. But, their record in Mumbai attack is even worse, the two home ministers, central and state, had several inputs about seaborne attack, yet did nothing. They were content to let a couple of hundred people be shot dead.
Re: Would Mr. Man Mohan Singh done anything different?
by Suresh Bhave on Apr 15, 2009 02:33 AM
BJP are a bunch of idiots. They are unable to refute congress's charges because they have stopped thinking. Mr. Advani is too old and, in pramod mahajan they have lost the only guy with brains, except for Mr. jaitley who remains in a huff. That is why Mr. manmohan singh can get away with all sorts of spoutings against BJP. What about the 91 POWs in Pak, why has the brave sardar not been able to spare a minute to getting those guys back. What about the anti-Sikh riot in Delhi and otherwise, how many buckets of crocodile tears have congressmet, the worshippers of nonviolence and the follower of the Mahatma have shed over the thousands of innocents that their partymen massacred. They become so emotional over babri masjid, what about living men and women who were killed in braod daylight and in cold blood simply because they were sikhs. Mr. MMS must become a statesman and not a politician. that is what people have expected of him, but god has feet of clay.
Re: Re: Would Mr. Man Mohan Singh done anything different?
by Indian on Apr 15, 2009 09:20 AM
Suresh bhai, your points are well taken. I can't agree with you more. But what is our choice today?
Kargil was a bold step taken by BJP. If Cong were at power, we would never had a Kargil war. Inki phat jati hai war-se.
And you have seen BJP in power only for 5 years in which they brought down the interest rates, maintained the inflation under control, gave a good gradual relief to the taxpayers and created a congenial environment for industrial growth on which Cong rode their success from 2004 to 2008. But after 26/11 what has Cong done? The same Manmohan Singh declared that within next 100 days his govt would set up a strong Anti-Terror Law. What happened to that? Or maybe he meant 100 days from 2020.
Therefore my friend, please don't go by the false claims of Cong. They are the biggest enemies of our country. Now Priyanka has already started saying the Rahul would be a good PM. PM ka kursi kya unke baap ka raaj hai? Who should decide the PM? The Nehru-Gandhi family or us?
You can show your power to them by voting for BJP.
Re: Release of Terrorists in Kandhar ?
by Observer on Apr 15, 2009 12:20 AM
What is most important to you - fighting terrorism or cornering BJP leaders which in no way help fight against terrorism?
A CHOR when cought asking why did you keep the window open!
Re: Re: Release of Terrorists in Kandhar ?
by Indian on Apr 15, 2009 09:23 AM
Surendra bhai, Kargil was a bold step taken by BJP. If Cong were at power, we would never had a Kargil war. Inki phat jati hai war-se.
And you have seen BJP in power only for 5 years in which they brought down the interest rates, maintained the inflation under control, gave a good gradual relief to the taxpayers and created a congenial environment for industrial growth on which Cong rode their success from 2004 to 2008. But after 26/11 what has Cong done? The same Manmohan Singh declared that within next 100 days his govt would set up a strong Anti-Terror Law. What happened to that? Or maybe he meant 100 days from 2020.
Therefore my friend, please don't go by the false claims of Cong. They are the biggest enemies of our country. Now Priyanka has already started saying the Rahul would be a good PM. PM ka kursi kya unke baap ka raaj hai? Who should decide the PM? The Nehru-Gandhi family or us?
You can show your power to them by voting for BJP.
First BJP tells the truth that who is telling lie Mr. Jaswant Singh or Mr. Advani.
And if Mr. Vajpai didn't took in confidence to Mr. Advani (according to the Advani statement)about the releasing of the terrorists in Kandhar, Tell why ? What is the reason. Its a big conspiracyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.
I had been closely watching the Kandahar hijack news in December 1999. I know that the enire nation, including then opposition Congress wanted the release of 200 passengers in the exchange for 3 or 5 terrorists. The decision was taken by Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee, an all aprty meeting was called in which Congress had participated. The issue was discussed in all party meeting. Everybody had welcomed the decision as an only option, nobody objected then. Even Congress did not rake up the issue for six long years.
Congress is trying to fool the young voters who were too young then (in Dec 1999) to make their opinion. Youngsters should ask Congress why they need another 10 years to get rid of poverty after ruling for last 5 years and a total of 50 years, and why did they expect NDA to get rid of poverty in just 5 years in 2004 and carried out a fraudant campaign against NDA. Youngsters deserved a better present, and we are going only in wrong direction in last 5 years.
First BJP tells the truth that who is telling lie Mr. Jaswant Singh or Mr. Advani.
And if Mr. Vajpai didn't took in confidence to Mr. Advani (according to the Advani statement)about the releasing of the terrorists in Kandhar, Tell why ? What is the reason. Its a big conspiracyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.
Re: Who is lier Mr. Jaswant Singh or Mr. Advani ?
by Observer on Apr 15, 2009 12:00 AM
What is most important to you - fighting terrorism or cornering BJP leaders which in no way help fight against terrorism?
Re: Who is lier Mr. Jaswant Singh or Mr. Advani ?
by jack back on Apr 14, 2009 11:24 PM
Do you know exactly what Advaniji said? All he had clarified was he did not know about the release of terrorists as it was a conditional work. The meeting convined by Vajpayeeji, which included MMS & Congi Queen along with other Psudo Congis & Reds, decided to do what Jashwant Singh did. Historically these islamo fasist terrorists kill their hostages even after their demands are met. And so Jaswant decided to be there as an international witness holding high office in India, and made sure about release of passengers & the plane before releasing terrorists.Congis should never make this an election issue yet for power & money these corrupt anti-national congis go any low.Unfortunately a lot of Indians, including some so called educated holding hig degrees, support these Congis & Psudo congis.
