Discussion Board

Sher-e-Punjab: Rahul


Total 1641 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
sultan bhatt
We need Sher-E-Hind
by sultan bhatt on Apr 15, 2009 10:43 AM  | Hide replies

If MMS is sher-e-punjab let him be in Ounjab only. We are looking looking for Sher-E-Hind & the right candidate is Narendra Modi.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: We need Sher-E-Hind
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 10:53 AM
MMS's last name is Sher (Singh). Rahul baba thinks one state at a time. What Soniaji would say will matter much more and she reckons MMS to be most suitable candidate for PMship from congress. This is why people worship Soniaji and drink cow milk.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
JGN
Re: Re: We need Sher-E-Hind
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 10:57 AM
She reckons MMS to be very docile and most appropriate person to keep the seat warm till Pappu Rahul is mature enough to take over the mantle! There are no shers in Congress party; only Puppets in the hands of an Italian widow.

We have even lost proud in our Country and allowed a foreigner to control the fate of a billion-plus population just within 55 years of gaining independence from the European colonizers.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: We need Sher-E-Hind
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 11:12 AM
It is true that there can be only one top dog/CEO in any organization and politics is no different. When Indira Gandhi was there it was much worse. She wanted complete subservienec. Remember what happened with DevRaj Urs in Karnataka (eevn when she was out of power). Internal democracy is not there in any political party in India. Which party has democracy? BJP or BSP?? Sanjay Manch or Telegu Desam? Congress is no exception.

Given this is how it is, who can perform better- a coalition of minor parties externally supported by rival major parties like BJP and communists?? OR a coalition of somewhat likeminded parties which do not insist on communal politics. Why was it easy for BJP to form NDA? Think about it and you would get the answer that Vajpayee was the moderate fatherly figure keeping all of them together. Now if in the UPA camp parties do not find it offensive to unite under Soniaji's flag then so be it. Whats the big deal about her foreign origin?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
JGN
Re: Re: Re: Re: We need Sher-E-Hind
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 11:16 AM
Ms. Sonia Gandhi is also not much different. Can you tell me where is Ms. Margaret Alva after revolting over denial of ticket to her son??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
JGN
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: We need Sher-E-Hind
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 11:32 AM
lord Rama??? Congress party had submitted a sworn affidavit in the Supreme Court of India that there is no proof for the existence of Lord Ram. Then how are you taking his name??

Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: We need Sher-E-Hind
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 11:46 AM
JGN: I did not expect you to lose your composure on this. :)

Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: We need Sher-E-Hind
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 11:26 AM
Sonia is a human and no one expects her to be lord Rama. The point is she slightly more honest than others. And she has a little less unfulfilled political ambitions.

Forward   |   Report abuse
JGN
Re: Re: Re: Re: We need Sher-E-Hind
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 11:15 AM
The spineless congis could not find just one Indian worth leading them from a billion-plus population! Shame on us.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: We need Sher-E-Hind
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 11:23 AM
They did experiment with Kesari after PV. The people did not like him. If the people get entrtained by stories of kings and queens then whose fault is it? Sonia's- because she fell in love with Rajiv?

Forward   |   Report abuse
JGN
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: We need Sher-E-Hind
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 11:29 AM
Mr. P.V. Narasimha Rao was one of the most successful and respected Politician in our Country. We are now enjoying the results of econmic reforms initiated by him. Though MMS was the Finance Minister at that time, it was the support of PVN Rao that paved the way for economic reforms. If I remember correctly, MMS had tendered his resigned his resignations a number of times at that time.

Forward   |   Report abuse
kingfisher
MMS
by kingfisher on Apr 15, 2009 10:42 AM

is Chuha-e-Bharath

    Forward  |  Report abuse
neelam
Interview with sher a panjab
by neelam on Apr 15, 2009 10:37 AM

Reporter: What is your future plan?
she-pan: Rahul will be good.

Rep: how will you handle terrorism?
she-pan: BJP is not doing anything.

Rep: How will you assess K@ng for thier > 50 yers of rule???
Sher_ Pan: BJP is communal they have spoiled everything.

Rep: do you mean division of 1947???
Sher-pan: Advani is not fir for PM.

Interview was very long....


    Forward  |  Report abuse
kingfisher
Asli sher
by kingfisher on Apr 15, 2009 10:15 AM  | Hide replies

RG's general knowledge is pathetic.
Punjab me sher(lion) nahin hain. Bharath mein sirf ek jagah par asli junglewala Sher deknekho miltha hai aur woh hai - Gir Sanctuary joki Gujarat me hein. Aur Gujrat mein kaun rehta hain .....

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Asli sher
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 10:20 AM
Modi.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Re: Asli sher
by akchatte on Apr 15, 2009 10:39 AM
Modi is definitely a PM material. Once Advaniji steps down in 2014, Modiji will take over the noble baton.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: Asli sher
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 10:49 AM
Let Modi take over now. Advani is too old and Modi on his prime.

Who knows wether people will remember Gujarat that far out in future(2014).

   Forward   |   Report abuse
JGN
Re: Re: Re: Re: Asli sher
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 10:52 AM
Vivek Chandra, How can MMS be considered clean inspite of cash for votes scandal? Unless paying cash for saving Government is legal for you.

Apart from this, MMS several personal achievements:

1) Unethical use of Article 356 in Jarkhand which was reversed by Supreme Court

2) Illegal invitation to form government to Congress in Goa although NDA was the single largets pre poll coalition

3) Inclusion of corrupt and criminal people like Sibu Soren and Lalu and his team in the cabinet

Either Congress stooges can't see or do not want to see or think that other's can't see.




   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Asli sher
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 11:19 AM
How can a person who is prime minister of such a huge country be clean as cows milk? Is Narendra modi clean?? Was Pramod Mahajan clean??

MMS is okay to run the country and that is all that matters. There would always be allegation against any big political leader (including Vajpayees or Gandhis). The point is there was nothing proven against MMS in a court of law. So my suggestion is that let courts of India decide who is clean and who is not and let us treat everybody with respect and dignity unless proven otherwise. Whats the big deal about saying things which are mere allegations.

Forward   |   Report abuse
JGN
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Asli sher
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 11:41 AM
>>>>> The point is there was nothing proven against MMS in a court of law..............why don't you apply the same principle to Narendra Modi? Has any court of law indicted him in any case? Still you call him a demon citing just one unfortunate incident in 2002?? According to the latest report the final toll in Gujarat 2002 was 1180 (including the misssing and 260 persons shot dead by the Police - majority of them H1ndus - where as the toll in 1984 Anti-Sikh riots was nearly 5000. What right Ms. Sonia Gandhi had to call him "Maut ka saudaghar" when her late husband had justified the killing of the Sikhs in the name of "earth shaking when a big tree falls" ??

Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Asli sher
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 11:29 AM
You are the one who is missing the point. Read the post again and you would appreciate that I am asking you to stop finger pointing. I am the one who wants legal process to take its course rather than a trial her on this board.

Forward   |   Report abuse
JGN
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Asli sher
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 11:26 AM
Yes, you can only point out fingers at others. Nobody is telling that either telling that Narendra Modi is a "Saint" or Pramod Mahajan as an innocent lamb.

Then what makes you think that the congis are crystal clear?

And what proof you want for inducting Sibu Soren (convicted by SC of India) or Lalu Prasad Yadav (Fodder scam specialist) into the ministry?

Forward   |   Report abuse
anil sood
Weak PM & Ignorant Sonia
by anil sood on Apr 15, 2009 10:10 AM

It is indeed sad that Manmohan Singh is being dictated by a lady named Sonia who herself does not know any thing & just read out speeches prepared by others without knowing the meaning of the content which put her often in trouble. Congress which ruled the country for 125 years has no new ideas but to stick to power at all cost even sacrificing the national interest & interests of Hindu community. Rahul is novice in politics & his utterances are nothing but laughable stock. Vote BJP which can safeguard the interests of hindus & the country. Kandhar fiasco was the result of congress which never executed that bugger & the same way congress is reluctant to execute Afzal guru leaving it for BJP to execute. Manmohan Singh says sikh riots are blot on the face of nation then how will he describe the excesses by sikhs during 1980-1984. Does that make this surd proud of his community's action.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Jiggs
Weak PM is SHAME-E-PUNJAB.....
by Jiggs on Apr 15, 2009 09:54 AM  | Hide replies

WEAK PM Manmohan Singh is the Shame of the entire Sikh Community.
I am more incensed with him, coz he in true Congress tradition has started to speak WILD LIES, that too on National TV.
I always thought MMS is different from his gutter party, but by speaking the same wild lies, MMS is no better.
WEAK PM IS SHAME-E-PUNJAB.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Weak PM is SHAME-E-PUNJAB.....
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 10:00 AM
I feel proud that a fellow Sikh (with kesh) is prime minister of a country of more than one billion people.

Who dosent speak lies in indian politics. Put your hand on your heart and say Jiggs.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Re: Weak PM is SHAME-E-PUNJAB.....
by akchatte on Apr 15, 2009 10:05 AM
I also felt the same when he started. Now I am ashamed.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: Weak PM is SHAME-E-PUNJAB.....
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 10:07 AM
what has he done wrong? why are you ashamed? He is running the country and the government for 5 years, at least not forcing mid term polls on us.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
neelam
Re: Re: Re: Re: Weak PM is SHAME-E-PUNJAB.....
by neelam on Apr 15, 2009 10:29 AM
Messing country for five years on supervision of....
If criminals staright from jail can come and save the government. Then money game everyone has seen.... then why midterm???
Vajpai prefer to go but did,t buy one vote. Didn't even protest on illegal votes against his government.
He is and Ag@n@ read the books written by scholars.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
neelam
Re: Re: Re: Re: Weak PM is SHAME-E-PUNJAB.....
by neelam on Apr 15, 2009 10:28 AM
Messing country for five years on supervision of....
If criminals staright from jail can come and save the government. Then money game everyone has seen.... then why midterm???
Vajpai prefer to go but did,t buy one vote. Didn't even protest on illegal votes against his government.
He is and Ag@n@ read the books written by scholars.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Re: Re: Re: Weak PM is SHAME-E-PUNJAB.....
by akchatte on Apr 15, 2009 10:38 AM
Not forcing a mid-term election, might be a great achievement for you. What an achievement for a 'great' economist.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Weak PM is SHAME-E-PUNJAB.....
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 10:46 AM
Let us put things in perspective here...Last two quarters of negative growth in US and Western Europe and we have 4-6% GDP groth. Isnt this amazing??

Forward   |   Report abuse
neelam
Re: Re: Re: Re: Weak PM is SHAME-E-PUNJAB.....
by neelam on Apr 15, 2009 10:29 AM
Messing country for five years on supervision of....
If criminals staright from jail can come and save the government. Then money game everyone has seen.... then why midterm???
Vajpai prefer to go but did,t buy one vote. Didn't even protest on illegal votes against his government.
He is and Ag@n@ read the books written by scholars.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Weak PM is SHAME-E-PUNJAB.....
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 11:36 AM
It is unfortunate that people world over are losing jobs. More so in US than in India. Since we were already weak and unprepared it hurts more here than in the US. But try to think about the whole recession in perspective. they have negative groth and we do not. This is a glowing tribute to the political leadership of this country.

Forward   |   Report abuse
neelam
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Weak PM is SHAME-E-PUNJAB.....
by neelam on Apr 15, 2009 11:03 AM
Indian rupee is sinking against dollars and euro isn't that amazing?
Within few months 15 lacs jobs gone.

Look at the inflation, why food prices are increasing?

I am really amazed indeed.

Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Sharm-e-Punjab
by akchatte on Apr 15, 2009 09:36 AM  | Hide replies

Once on of my very good Sikh friend taught me

"SIKH KABHI BHIKH NAHI MANGTA"

I translate it as "SIKH DOES NEVER LICK"

Going by this law, Man Mohan Singh, who has grown his tongue thicker day by day with his daily habit of licking an Italian bartender, who also belongs to the Sikh-murdering family..
what else can I tell...

SHARM-E-PUNJAB

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Sharm-e-Punjab
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 09:40 AM
Stupid translation. Mangta is not lick. And bartenders are also humans. Nothing wrong in being a bartender, clener, bricklayer or a financial advisor.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Re: Sharm-e-Punjab
by akchatte on Apr 15, 2009 09:44 AM
You are fool enough to go by the literal translation.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: Sharm-e-Punjab
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 09:47 AM
even otherwise it is not funny.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sharm-e-Punjab
by akchatte on Apr 15, 2009 09:49 AM
True, funny is your response.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sharm-e-Punjab
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 09:52 AM
My response was not meant to be funny. If you do find fun then good for you. Fun is never bad.

Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Re: Sharm-e-Punjab
by akchatte on Apr 15, 2009 09:44 AM
Nothing wrong at her profession. It's wrong to lick her to stick to power.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: Sharm-e-Punjab
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 09:49 AM
"lick her to stick to power" may not be the correct usage. I suppose what you mean is suckup to her?

And this is where mangta-to-lick is not good enough a joke.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sharm-e-Punjab
by akchatte on Apr 15, 2009 09:54 AM
suckup....? hmmmmm...I would say succumb

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sharm-e-Punjab
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 09:57 AM
Succumb would be a one off exercise. Our singh does it routinely. Hence need a better word.

Forward   |   Report abuse
liberal ass
supporting Rahul as PM is like supporting caste-ism
by liberal ass on Apr 15, 2009 09:35 AM  | Hide replies

Just because Raul is from Gandhi/Nehru family, he is being portrayed as next PM, which clearly supports the old custom of caste-ism in Bharat. the profession is being decided by birth. otherwise, he doesn't have any credentials and accolades to stand as a strong leader.

if you want to rectify the curse of caste-ism, don't support him as PM.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Praveen Sharma
Re: supporting Rahul as PM is like supporting caste-ism
by Praveen Sharma on Apr 15, 2009 10:13 AM
It is the big shame for India that most of Prime minister of India are born only in Gandhi family. There r no any leader left in congress who can led india. If really rahul wants to lead this country before he has to become a minister of any depatment so he can relise the responsibility of a prime miister. What he never dot it. Its the policy of congress & Gandhi(Fake) Family to divide the people & rule India.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Guest
supporting Rahul as PM is supporting castism
by Guest on Apr 15, 2009 09:34 AM

Just because Raul is from Gandhi/Nehru family, he is being portrayed as next PM, which clearly supports the old custom of caste-ism in Bharat. the profession is being decided by birth. otherwise, he doesn't have any credentials and accolades to stand as a strong leader.

if you want to rectify the curse of caste-ism, don't support him as PM.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
kesireddy sreedhar
Who is he to certificate.
by kesireddy sreedhar on Apr 15, 2009 09:31 AM

Who is Rahul and what is his eligibility to give a SHER certificate to MMS. Did this dummy SHER contested any elections and won in his life. He could not control the ministers under him. Without his knowledge one ministry with the blessings of AMMA submitted an affidavit in the SC, declaring a GOD as fake who is maryada purushottam for crores of Indians from generations together.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 1641 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message