Mr. Prime Minister / Mrs. Sonia Gandhi / Mr. Rahul Gandhi
All the so-called SECULAR PARTIES are criticizing NDA Govt. for releasing of 3 terrorists for 180 innocent people. In that concern, few questions are coming in my mind.
1. Is Kandhar in India or in Afghanistan ? 2. In 1999, who was ruling Afghanistan ? 3. From where, the plane was hijacked ?
I think hope Iam not wrong that KANDHAR is in Afghanistan. In 1999, I think TALIBAN was ruling there (in Afghanistan) and according to the news, plane was hijacked from KATHMANDU in Nepal.
All world knows who the Talibaan is. Diplomatic relations between the Indian Govt and Afghanistan were not there at that time due to the Talibaan rule and Indian govt had not recognized the talibaan govt. Even whole world had not recongized Talibaan Govt. except the two nations : Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.
So tell me Mr. Prime Minister / Mrs. Sonia Gandhi / Mr. Rahul Gandhi, if KANDHAR happened at the time of your rule or if you were ruling in 1999, then what was your reaction?
Re: To All So Called Secular Parties . . . .
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 01:04 PM
Bhatia sahab, you forgot to ask the most important question. Who sent forces to the western border and rattled the both sides. Why was war posturing necessary if Pakistan did not appear in the equation.
Who's miscalculation was this that we'll explode and they can not? Intelligence failure?
Re: To All So Called Secular Parties . . . .
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 01:15 PM
Gaurav Bhatia, the Congi sycophants cannot see beyond their nose. One person is shamelessly declaring repeatedly that he "worships" Ms. Sonia Gandhi. It is beyong my comprehension as why any one should worship a fellow humanbeing (be what ever his/her status). They are also just humanbeings like us and by some strange co-incidence they are in some powerful position.
Yes, I do have a doubt over the hijack. The then Govt could have asked for shooting at the ari-craft thereby immobilizing the same. Probably there was no anti-hijacking policy in force at that time. Anyway, once the Plane was at Khandahar, there was no way except accepting the demands of the hijackers. I do not think even the Congress Govt could have acted any differently.
Re: Re: To All So Called Secular Parties . . . .
by Gaurav Bhatia on Apr 15, 2009 01:22 PM
Dear JGN
Thats what i am trying to say. In that circumstances, any govt, whether NDA / UPA or Left, would do the same thing. They were forced to free the terrorists because there was no other option. My quastion is that, why Congress is making this unfortunate incedent an election issue after 10 years. Even congress knows, there was no other option.
Re: Re: Re: To All So Called Secular Parties . . . .
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 01:26 PM
They are just exploiting the issue for narrow political gains. They could not get rid of their great Minority Affairs Minister, Janab Abdul Rehman Antualy for doubting the integrety of Mumbai Police team and ATS. If he was a Minister in China, he would have faced the "firing-squad" the next day. Congress party has again nominated to contest the current Parliament election also. So much for thier sense of proportion.
Re: To All So Called Secular Parties . . . .
by Unjinx on Apr 15, 2009 12:58 PM
Jas*want got a degree in catering from kandahar university. his hospitality has ben appreciated by the terrorists -- delicious biryani was served with style.
Re: Re: To All So Called Secular Parties . . . .
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 01:06 PM
And who is giving Degree for Dr. Manmohan Singh and Ms. Sonia Gandhi for feeding the choicest biriyani to Afzal Guru and Ajmal Kasaf??
Re: Rahul is part of the family and party responsible for 84 riot
by manish ashar on Apr 15, 2009 01:12 PM
raul baba was taught somke urdu and he was referring to 'sher' in urdu and though he was talking about sher aur shayari
Re: He's Sher and that's why the First Italian family of India
by manish ashar on Apr 15, 2009 01:49 PM
WHO NEEDS A LEASH WHEN THINGS ARE UNDER CONTROL IN ANY CASE
Re: let him be elected then
by manish ashar on Apr 15, 2009 01:13 PM
IT IS A GRAND STRATEGY OF SONIA AND HER CRONIES TO SHOW MMS IN BAD LIGHT AND CREATE THE GROUND WORK FOR REMOVING HIM IF HE IS REINSTALLED AFTER ELECTIONS.
THE IDIOT RAUL HAS ALREADY SAID THAT HE CAN WIN FROM ANY SEAT AND IF STILL MMS DOESNT STAND, WHAT DOES I SHOW?
Re: let him be elected then
by bharat kapoor on Apr 15, 2009 01:10 PM
WHAT U SUGGEST FIGHTING ELECTION FROM PANJAB ? EVER FOR A SEAT IN RAJYASABHA CONGRESS PARIVAR SENDS HIM ALL THE WAY TO ASSAM !
Re: let him be elected then
by PEHCHANKAUN on Apr 15, 2009 12:10 PM
If gandhis offer him amethi or raibarreli (which is remotely impossible) then also the "SHER-E-PUPPET OF THE WORLD" cant win. He is such a moron.
Re: Re: let him be elected then
by manish ashar on Apr 15, 2009 01:15 PM
RAUL SHOULD STAND FROM J&K SINCE HE CLAIMS TO BE PART OF NEHRU FAMILY. EVEN SONIA CAN DO IT IF SHE DARES
Re: let him be elected then
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 12:12 PM
This is how a lion attacks... from the back. Watch some discovery videos Niloufer.
Why are you taking the name of lord Rama??? Congress party had submitted a sworn affidavit in the Supreme Court of India that there is no proof for the existence of Lord Ram. Then how are you taking his name??
Re: Re: @ Vivek Chandra
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 12:45 PM
I do not believe in any g0d but firmly believe that Ram was a noble king of Raghuvamsham. Kalidasa's Raghuvamsham is the story of 21 kings from Dileepan to Agnivarnan. Divinity was granted to Ram by vested interests later.
Then do any one have the courage to file an affidavit in any Court of Law telling that there is no proof for the existence of any G0D? Then I will not quetion the affidavit filed by Congress party. You cannot question only the faith of the H1ndus as they are not so intolerant was the followers of the West Asian re1igions.
>>>>> The point is there was nothing proven against MMS in a court of law..............why don't you apply the same principle to Narendra Modi? Has any court of law indicted him in any case? Still you call him a demon citing just one unfortunate incident in 2002?? According to the latest report the final toll in Gujarat 2002 was 1180 (including the misssing and 260 persons shot dead by the Police - majority of them H1ndus - where as the toll in 1984 Anti-Sikh riots was nearly 5000. What right Ms. Sonia Gandhi had to call him "Maut ka saudaghar" when her late husband had justified the killing of the Sikhs in the name of "earth shaking when a big tree falls" ??
Re: @ Vivek Chandra
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 11:50 AM
I dont speak for anyone else (far less for a congi) but ya I dont call Modi a Yamraj until this is proven in a court of law.
Re: Re: @ Vivek Chandra
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 12:41 PM
>>>>We worship Soniaji........then why not put her also on a X and install in the middle of Connaught Circus? Then I will also worship her!!!!!
Re: Re: Re: Re: @ Vivek Chandra
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 01:09 PM
Yes, you are right. I have not seen an innocent like Ms. Sonia Gandhi who had no shame in calling some one "Maut ka Saudagar" for his alleged role in a riot (final toll 1180 including missing and 260 H1ndus shot dead by Police) where as her late husband justified the killing of nearly 5000 Sikhs in the name of "earth shaking when a big tree falls"!!! One Big tree is more important to the Congis than the life of 59 passengers!
Re: PM is not weak, he is Sher-e-Punjab: Rahul
by Vivek Chandra on Apr 15, 2009 11:40 AM
Shers are not found in Punjab. I dont know about any tiger sanctuary in Punjab either.
Re: Re: Re: PM is not weak, he is Sher-e-Punjab: Rahul
by abhishek on Apr 15, 2009 12:01 PM
You need to check about the history and freedom fighter of Punjab. If Shers would not have been in Punjab then the name of this country would have been Mughlestan.And your type of dogs would have been responsible for that.
Re: Re: Re: Re: PM is not weak, he is Sher-e-Punjab: Rahul
by JGN on Apr 15, 2009 12:48 PM
One Punjab does not make India. Have you heard of Pazhassi Raja, the Lion of Kerala?? Yes, of course I do respect our Sikh brothers for their bravery and my reply was a sacrcastic one for Mr. Vivek Chandra (Shers are not found in Punjab).
