Discussion Board

Will send troops to Pak:BJP


Total 2831 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
tali
WE SHOULD START FROM INSIDE
by tali on Apr 14, 2009 09:01 AM  | Hide replies

As Varun suggested,eliminating porkis should start from inside.We should first cut the heads of these people then we should proceed with the invasion of porkistan.
Varun should be the defense minister and Modi should be foriegn minister.India's problem will be solved in a matter of days.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
akchatte
Re: WE SHOULD START FROM INSIDE
by akchatte on Apr 14, 2009 09:02 AM
I would feel safe in such a government

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mahesh Nair
Re: WE SHOULD START FROM INSIDE
by Mahesh Nair on Apr 14, 2009 09:05 AM
So you want Nehru's grandson to be the defence minister. Cha Cha Nehru Zindabad. Cha Cha Nehru Zindabad.
Cha Cha Nehru Zindabad.
Long Live Indian national Congress.

But why that dirty face, ugly Modi doing with the foreign ministry sack him immediately.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Re: WE SHOULD START FROM INSIDE
by akchatte on Apr 14, 2009 09:06 AM
Yes, Modi will sack Patil, Chawla, and all sold out bureaucrats...don't worry

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rohit sharma
Re: Re: Re: WE SHOULD START FROM INSIDE
by rohit sharma on Apr 14, 2009 09:30 AM
ackchatte....modi is nations shame personality...ur happy only b'ze he did a work of Terorist and killed 3k people in gujrat...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: WE SHOULD START FROM INSIDE
by Against Pseudos on Apr 14, 2009 09:07 AM
Nair:

:-).... look who is frustrated now?... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Re: Re: WE SHOULD START FROM INSIDE
by akchatte on Apr 14, 2009 09:08 AM
Dont take stress, all Congis are frustrated

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mahesh Nair
Re: Re: Re: Re: WE SHOULD START FROM INSIDE
by Mahesh Nair on Apr 14, 2009 09:21 AM
All B Jinnah's P are frustrated. A party which will not cross 2 digits in UP has a president form UP.
Frustrated BJP's

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WE SHOULD START FROM INSIDE
by Against Pseudos on Apr 14, 2009 10:51 AM
Nair:

:-).... look who is frustrated now?... :)


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mahesh Nair
Useless HM
by Mahesh Nair on Apr 14, 2009 08:57 AM  | Hide replies

As MMS rightly said this PM candidate is not strong. In fact the word strong is missing in his dictionary. Forget PM he was the weakest HM India has had. He spent most of his tenure defending the misdeeds of his party colleagues, sympathisers.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Useless HM
by Against Pseudos on Apr 14, 2009 09:01 AM
Nair:

:-)... MMS seems to erroneously think that there is an incumbent NDA government and is rehashing all decade old issues instead of providing us with his government's 2004-09 scorecard....

and you happily jump on to that bandwagon.... :)

Gives so much more credence to Advani's allegations that he has been a weak PM throughout, becoz he hasn't given us any reason to think otherwise... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
akchatte
Re: Re: Useless HM
by akchatte on Apr 14, 2009 09:05 AM
MMS tells someone else not srong???

Joke of the year.

The weakest PM ever in history, tells someone not strong...Oh perhaps he meant a strong tongue, that grows stronger by the daily habit of licking an Italian bartender

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mahesh Nair
Re: Re: Re: Useless HM
by Mahesh Nair on Apr 14, 2009 09:19 AM
You call MMS the weakest PM. There is enough evidence that Advani was the weakest HM. He melted like a candle. He compares himself to sardar patel, and parises Jinnah at the same time. He will be known in history as as former HM?
Besides Vajpayee BJP has no PM material. Now Varun Sanjay Gandhi grandson of Pandit Nehru is their only solution. Cha Cha Nehru Zindabad. Long Live the legacy of Indian National Congress

   Forward   |   Report abuse
AJAY NAYAK
Re: Re: Re: Re: Useless HM
by AJAY NAYAK on Apr 14, 2009 09:30 AM
May be advani melted like candle. But for what sake. To save 100's of innocent civilians.

But MMS melted and lost sleep for the sake of Haneef and Afzal Guru may even for Kasab.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
That is what we expect
by akchatte on Apr 14, 2009 08:57 AM

Indian army should know the Taliban base in order to fight them. They should take part in the great war for peace along with US and UK armies, which would be faught on the soil of Pakistan

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Aries aries
MUSLIM MAJORITY
by Aries aries on Apr 14, 2009 08:54 AM  | Hide replies

Why are all muslim majority countries declared as islamic countries and why are all muslim minority countries declared as secular.

Think why and you will know the truth.TRUTH IS BITTER.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Exposse
Re: MUSLIM MAJORITY
by Exposse on Apr 14, 2009 09:04 AM
True-There are muslim majority countries like Malaysia,Saudi,Qatar,UAE etc where there is a sizeable non-muslim population.But not once there were riots and people killed in huge numbers.But this sickular country has a mass murderer as CM.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Re: MUSLIM MAJORITY
by akchatte on Apr 14, 2009 09:12 AM
It is clear, either you are trying to beffol people or you do not know anything.

Who tells you there is no riot in Malaysia or Indonesia?

In these two countries non-Musl1m population is decreasing drastically. They are opressed. Everyday, you can read news of their oppression in dailies.

Till now, these two countries had borne the great Hindoo and Buddhist legacy, so they were to an extent peaceful.

But, how long a Musl1m can evade from the venom? It has hi them now, and they started showing their green color of devil.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Exposse
Re: Re: Re: MUSLIM MAJORITY
by Exposse on Apr 14, 2009 09:17 AM
Non Muslim population is decreasing??You sound as if they are getting vapourized without no one noticing them.
Unable to digest the fact that they are emracing islam,you try to attribute it to some sort of ethinic cleaning.Where is UN?Why cant your hindutuva parivar come up with facts (???) about the mass murders done by malay/indonesia muslims against the so called dwindling hin_doo population



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mahesh Nair
Love for Pakistan.
by Mahesh Nair on Apr 14, 2009 08:53 AM  | Hide replies

A frustrated bjp.

The J in BJP stands for Jinnah. Hence the love for Pakistan.

The Prime Ministerial candidate is a Jinnah loyalist till the core. If he loved him so much why did he come to India should have stayed back in Pakistan where he was born. Do they want to send India's army to train along with the Talibs.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Love for Pakistan.
by akchatte on Apr 14, 2009 09:01 AM
Yes, because Jinnah was far better and progressive than Nehru and Maulana Azad. Whatever Nehru did for independence (which is basically nothing) was also done by Jinnah before partition.

While Azad opposed Jinnah's theory of partition because Azad asked not to fight for a fraction of India, as in another 25 years, Musl1ms would get a full India with all benefits of Pak1stan.
This was what Maulana Azad said in 'India wins freedom'.

If Cong can be Azad loyalist, and glorify Azad as secular, what's the wrong Advani did saying Jinnah secular as well?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mahesh Nair
Re: Re: Love for Pakistan.
by Mahesh Nair on Apr 14, 2009 09:08 AM
A frustrated reply.

Cha Cha Nehru Zindbad. Now BJP has no leaders. So they will love Jinnah to the hilt. And Nehru's grandson will be promoted for the PM's post.

Cha Cha Nehru Zindabad. Long live Indian National Congress.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Re: Re: Love for Pakistan.
by akchatte on Apr 14, 2009 09:14 AM
You are definitely frustrated or narco-sick

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Love for Pakistan.
by Against Pseudos on Apr 14, 2009 09:09 AM
Nair:

Dunno about Chatte, but you sure seem to be a thoroughly frustrated character.... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Love for Pakistan.
by akchatte on Apr 14, 2009 09:18 AM
Nair, go back to pakistan

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Love for Pakistan.
by Against Pseudos on Apr 14, 2009 09:02 AM
Nair:

Curious to know where did you pick up the fact that Advani was born in Pakistan?....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mahesh Nair
Re: Re: Love for Pakistan.
by Mahesh Nair on Apr 14, 2009 09:09 AM
Advani was born and brought up in Pakistan. he studied in Lahore my dear friend.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Re: Re: Love for Pakistan.
by akchatte on Apr 14, 2009 09:14 AM
Then also find out where MMS was born?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Love for Pakistan.
by Against Pseudos on Apr 14, 2009 09:10 AM
Nair:

Kindly tell us how do you make that invention?.... To the best of my knowledge, Advani wasn't born after 1947... Now do you wish us to believe that he is much younger than what we think he is?....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Re: Re: Re: Love for Pakistan.
by akchatte on Apr 14, 2009 09:17 AM
Nair was also born in pakistan

   Forward   |   Report abuse
South Indian
Alzhimers
by South Indian on Apr 14, 2009 08:29 AM  | Hide replies

Kandahar and freeing Maulana Mazood and others - Advani was home minister but he had no idea what was going on!! That is what he wrote in his boook

Maulana from kandahar went to Pakistan form the Lashkare Toiba and come back, now to the Indian parliamnet. In fact after seeing the bullets coming, Advai ran, but he didnt know what was happening.

Now to understand what exactly is happening he wanna become the prime minister.

And sending troops to Pakistan to help them???

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Alzhimers
by Against Pseudos on Apr 14, 2009 08:40 AM
Southie:

Maulana joined Indian Parliament?.... that's news to even me .... maybe MMS or SoniyaJi have managed a seat for him there?... :)

However it will be quite good to know what you are trying to tell us, so please tell us when you will know what you are trying to tell us.... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mahesh Nair
Re: Re: Alzhimers
by Mahesh Nair on Apr 14, 2009 08:50 AM
A frustrated bjp.

The J in BJP stands for Jinnah. Hence the love for Pakistan.

Do they want to send India's army to train along with the Talibs.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Alzhimers
by Against Pseudos on Apr 14, 2009 09:05 AM
Nair:

I don't know about me, but going through both your message contents, your language and your overall state of mind being projected on the forum, I can with reasonable confidence state that it is you who is frustrated.... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
akchatte
Re: Re: Re: Alzhimers
by akchatte on Apr 14, 2009 09:03 AM
Yes, because Jinnah was far better and progressive than Nehru and Maulana Azad. Whatever Nehru did for independence (which is basically nothing) was also done by Jinnah before partition.

While Azad opposed Jinnah's theory of partition because Azad asked not to fight for a fraction of India, as in another 25 years, Musl1ms would get a full India with all benefits of Pak1stan.
This was what Maulana Azad said in 'India wins freedom'.

If Cong can be Azad loyalist, and glorify Azad as secular, what's the wrong Advani did saying Jinnah secular as well?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
South Indian
Re: Re: Alzhimers
by South Indian on Apr 14, 2009 08:53 AM
Dear pseudo
You even dont know the same terrorist who is freed by Mr.Advani, the notorious Maulana Mazood form the LeT after his release and LeT attack our parliament??? Or you mak a joke out of it?????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Alzhimers
by Against Pseudos on Apr 14, 2009 09:04 AM
Southie:

YOU are making a joke of it.... :)

My dear, Parliament was attacked by Afzal Guru.... though you won't know it as you don't seem to be from India.... hai kya?....

Afzal abhi bhi India mein hi hai... pata hai?.... ki nahi pata?... :)
Aur woh kya kar raha hai pata hai?... ki woh bhi nahi pata?.. :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Great Khali
Reckless statememts by people who do not fight elections
by Great Khali on Apr 14, 2009 08:29 AM  | Hide replies

Rajnath Singh of late has been making ridiculous statements that hurt his party's interest in the elections. He's raising unnecessary allegations when they are questionable. On the Kandahar issue, it's just illogical that Manmohan Singh was consulted but Advani has openly said that he was never involved in the decision to release terrorists.

Now, India don't wanna be the next US (global alliance of the willing, war on terror). We must proceed against Pakistan only when there is a threat to our borders. Let Pakistan deal with terrorists. If they arrive at our borders, we must initiate action. Such baseless comments reveal the hollow foreign policy stance of the BJP, which relies on military action as the solution for all our problems in the neighbourhood. Not the way to go Mr. Rajnath. You will never make these statements if you were the Foreign Minister.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Reckless statememts by people who do not fight elections
by Against Pseudos on Apr 14, 2009 08:42 AM
GK:

Fair enough.... the way you have a stand on the issue, other too have a stand on the issue...

And in any case, this is a mere possibility being discussed at this stage, not official BJP policy..

So hold on to your hat...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sam
VOTE BJP
by Sam on Apr 14, 2009 08:24 AM

AND CRUSH TERRROR ONCE AND FOR ALL....

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Baba Kamdev
Shivsena
by Baba Kamdev on Apr 14, 2009 08:19 AM

Shivsena is the only party on which Nation can depend upon.

It is the only one which never changes it's stand.

Bal Thakaray has demanded that 'India should stop all trade, sports, tourism with Pakistan unless it stops supporting terrorism' since Vajpayee government.

BJP & Congress say one thing & does exactly opposite.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
mayurapriyan sivaraman
Hmmm
by mayurapriyan sivaraman on Apr 14, 2009 08:17 AM  | Hide replies

Though this moron is RIGHT! in saying that... however attacking pakistan is not feasible and that is not that easy and we have to think how many lives we have to sacrifice. Americans are fighting the taliban for 8 yrs and still they couldnt win and taliban is just growing strong.
Americans have spent billions and billions for the war. Yet they are the losers.
Attacking pakistan means we are dirtying ourselves instead of going on our way of growth...
My suggestion would be let pakistan rot on its own. Lets not compete with them. See how China has grown. Lets compete with them economically, militarily... etc...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Hmmm
by Against Pseudos on Apr 14, 2009 08:23 AM
Siva"doesn't exist"an:

Kindly at least read the subject matter you are supposed to be commenting upon....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sam
Re: Re: Hmmm
by Sam on Apr 14, 2009 08:25 AM
this guy is a Paki, pretending to be a south indian.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Sam
Re: Hmmm
by Sam on Apr 14, 2009 08:23 AM
zip it Paki?? there are many ways to skin a paki...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 2831 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Write a message