Re: Re: Re: Re: Shame
by Prakash Chandra on Apr 12, 2009 11:40 PM
Good name. But this very Ugly Aur Pagli is goint be the next PM. You and me may not like it. But everything is going toward this mishappening.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Shame
by bhimsen on Apr 12, 2009 11:52 PM
Doubt it very much coz she doesn't have any followng beyond UP. Neither Cong nor BJP will support her.
Re: Re: Re: Shame
by unknown Indian on Apr 12, 2009 11:18 PM
if any one objects to thier thinking they will abuse you by calling paki/vatican agents/ converts/ mullah/ katloo. bunch of pathetic losers
Re: Re: Re: Re: Shame
by bhimsen on Apr 12, 2009 11:30 PM
If you still have your blinker on then it is not our fault. Seems like you are the breed who revels when others abuse Indians / hindus
Re: Re: Shame
by Prakash Chandra on Apr 12, 2009 11:12 PM
You think so, Drax ! Okay. I will stop drinking fresh Kerala tadi. Instead I will take gujrati tharra, daily.
Re: Shame
by M Zerba on Apr 12, 2009 11:05 PM
I think Modi is correct.
What kind of security could the slaves provide to us on 26/11 or thereafter? Well we know, some of your grandslaves wept quite a lot in front of US admin. Bunch of jokers.....
Can you vote for this communal party (Congress) who are anti Hindu and anti Sikh? Pseudo Pro Islam for vote bank politics. Congress calls themselves 'secular' - one way, they are correct as the MASTER family of these slaves is a mixture of blood of many religions, we may not know all.
Re: CONGRESS IS ANTI-HINDU ANTI-SIKH
by bhimsen on Apr 12, 2009 10:56 PM
There are enough anti Indians and white men slaves who will vote for Congies. And their number is not teeny weeny but 40 crores including commies and secularists.
Re: Re: Re: CONGRESS IS ANTI-HINDU ANTI-SIKH
by M Zerba on Apr 12, 2009 11:38 PM
Tarun Mishraji- When a person abuses or goes for a personal attack without substance, it refers to his/her weakness or butterheadedness. Now, I don't know what category of alaves you personally belong to. Anyway, let us face it.
Firstly, when India was split in to 2 dominions during 1947, one was named Hindustan - did you read the history? Yes, it is 'Hindustan'. One of your GrandMasters made it 'secular' India. No objections. Do you know where the fund of INA did go? Court papers are ready. Did your masters share you with a sweety pie of secret Swiss Bank accounts? No? I feel shame, sorry, bro.
When 26/11 happened, where were your Grand Masters? Do you remember how much they wept in front of Obama admin? I heard of about a river almost. What is the result? What security could your impotent masters provide? What did they do afterwards? Why do you go for slavery of these useless people? I suggest, get out of that unimportant bandwagon. Make India strong. Let us make India proud by doing whatever we can on our own but definitely not resorting to slavery or anti-Hinduism or antiSikhism. Try to hate these. Avoid these people by all means.
I recommend you go through one book - 'The Last Days of the British Raj'. Open your eyes, man. I promise I won't attack anyone personally as you are also another fellow Indian, another of my brothers.
Congressi & like minded parties & media spare no occasion to castigate Narendra Modi for the Gujarat riots of 2002. However, their words would have more credibility if they expressed comparable shame at the fact that their party led the way in showing that riots and massacres can be used as means to manipulate vote banks. Apart from the infamous massacre of Sikhs in 1984, the 1970s and 1980s witnessed a series of communal riots presided over by the Congress party in places like Meerut, Malliana, Jamshedpur, Kanpur, Bhiwandi, Bhagalpur, Ahmedabad and Hyderabad. The arrest of Congress leader Meghsingh Chaudhary at the instance of the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigative Team for his active participation in the Gulbarga Society massacre in Ahmedabad in 2002 confirms what knowledgeable people in Gujarat have for long alleged that many Congressmen enthusiastically joined hands in the anti-Muslim riots of 2002.
Re: Congress hand in Gujrat Riots.
by Tarun Mishra on Apr 12, 2009 11:11 PM
ravishankar, we are voting for 2009 lok sabha and you are digging out the 70s and 80s while BJP is engeged in riots in last8 years.....grow up man. THink for the future. you can't blame congress for 1947 riot of hindu and muslim...
90% leaders of the congress party are Hindus. be it Nehru family , deoras, scindias,sachin pilots,Pranab Mukerjee ,Kapil sibal, manoj tiwari, digvijay singh etc. But why the congress party don't have the support of sanghi hindus?. Is it that sanghis consider only those who mocks the Indian judciary by demolishing babri masjid a Hindu? or those who took law into the hands by rioting aganist the minorties a Hindu? or only those who support mass murderer Modi a Hindu? it is very puzzling the attitude of the sanghis
Re: Hindu congress
by ravishankar singh on Apr 12, 2009 11:01 PM
my dear "Bhula Bhataka Indian". you can understand this in a way that even Israeli's have also succumbed to some demands of Jihadi terrorists but we don't doubt their intention to fight Jihadi terrorists. My dear the intention of the Congress is oinly catch vote by hook or crook. But the intention of RSS is to safeguard the interests of Hindus against the atrocities of Jihadi.
Re: Hindu congress
by M Zerba on Apr 12, 2009 10:55 PM
MASTER family of this SLAVE party might be totally 'secular'. Nehru-GhazhiKhan-Maino (No Gandhi blood probably) - well, I know this far. Can any slave plz fill in if you know of any other blood in the family of your MASTERS?
vote for any other person but not congress. Unless you want rape by raul,slavery of italians,illiteracy,gayism,americanism,slums,mass murder of hindus,
Re: Re: Sonia =congress= slums,slavery ,rape,illiteracy
by AL ILAHI on Apr 12, 2009 10:42 PM
List of Congress created Communal Violance and the List of Generated Terrorists (e.g. Bhnidranwale) are endless (never ending)
Re: News
by Ashwin Ramaswamy on Apr 12, 2009 10:37 PM
Prakash read my big posts below to see threat of collaboration of Jihadists with American Right Wing Extremoists
