Discussion Board

Nation knows who spews venom: Sonia


Total 69 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
anjaneya
Is this True seculiarism – someone plssss clarify
by anjaneya on Apr 10, 2009 07:50 PM  | Hide replies

Sikhs getting slaughered in thousands = A MISTAKE.
Hindus getting killed in Kashmir = Political problem.
Muslims getting killed by a few hundred = Holocaust.
Poor protestors getting shot in WB under Left Govt = Misunderstanding.

Banning Parzania in Gujarat = Communal.
Banning Da Vinci Code and Jo Bole So Nihaal = Secular.

Kargil Attack = Government failure.
Chinese invasion in 1962 = Unfortunate betrayal.

Reservations in every school and college on caste lines = Secular. Reservations in Minority institutions = Communal.

Fake encounters in Gujarat [Sohrabuddin] = BJP Communalism.
Fake encounters under Cong-NCP in Maharashtra [Khwaja Younus] = Police atrocity.

Talking about Hindus and Hinduism appeasment = Communal. Talking about Muslims and Islam = Secular.

BJP freeing 3 terrorists to save 100 Indian hostages = Shameful
Congress freeing 4 militants to save just a life of one daughter of I Home minister in Kashmir [Rubina Sayed] = Natural Political dilemma.

Attack on Parliament = BJP ineptitude. Not hanging Afzal Guru the mastermind despite Supreme Court orders = Humanity and Political dilemma.

BJP questioning Islam = Communal. Congress questioning Lord Ramas existance = Clerical Error.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
MD
Re: Is this True seculiarism – someone plssss clarify
by MD on Apr 10, 2009 09:44 PM
very well said...I agree with you.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sardar Patel
Re: Is this True seculiarism – someone plssss clarify
by Sardar Patel on Apr 10, 2009 07:54 PM
52 Muslim countries only India Provides Haj Subsidy that too from Temple funds
52 Muslim countries only India Provides Special Rights
AP Christian CM gives 2 hills at Tirupathi for missionaries activities N conversions
85% Hindus craves for indulgence of 15% minority
Show one Muslim country, which has a Non Muslim as its President or Prime Minister
Show ONE Nullah or Maulvi who declared a Fatwa against terrorists
Maharashtra Kerala Bihar Pondicherry had muslim CM can U ever imagine Hindu CM for Kashmir In 1947 Hindu population in Pakistan was 24% today it is 1%
In 1947 Hindu population in Bangladesh was 30% today it is 7%
Muslim population in India has gone up from 10.4% to 14%
Whereas Hindu population in India has come down from 87.2 to 85%
Do Hindus Human Rights??? Are Hindus Fundamentalist??
If Hindus R Fundamentalist how come Madarasas N Masjids R thriving
When uniform is compulsory for school children why No Uniform Civil Code for the Citizens?? Abdul Rehman Antulay ws made trustee of Siddhi Vinayak Temple Can Laloo OR Mulayem dream of becoming a trustee of Madarasa or Masjid
Can this Happen anywhere Except Hindu Nation BHARATH Jai Hind


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Kamadhenu
Atleast Pls do not divide the nation further
by Kamadhenu on Apr 10, 2009 07:49 PM

Religion-based head count in Army is irrelevant
Latest in the series of controversies centred on the Congress party’s fixation with Muslim grievances is the data collection exercise involving the Indian Armed Forces.
It is irrelevant and mischievous to mention about caste-based divisions in the Army during the British rule.
Congress leaders not only divided the country politically but also militarily. The military officers and men of pre-independence India , belonging to all communities fought the WWII together under the British.

Pakistan got a ready-made army at its birth. When Indian Muslims got Pakistan they also got a Muslim army carved out of the undivided Indian Army. This army produced Pakistani generals and officers who fought wars with India — the first full scale war being in 1965. This is history in living memory.

The Congress party having divided and ruled the country for decades is continuing with its dangerous game and monstrous thinking of doing a head count for the Army now.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
IndianIndian
Before the mid of 20th century all the countries of world
by IndianIndian on Apr 10, 2009 07:27 PM

Before the mid of 20th century all the countries throughout the world including our country had small and big rulers, kings, dictators etc with kingdoms for every kilometers or hundreds of kilometers; having mass killings, sexual crimes, barbarism throughout the world irrespective of religion, language, caste, race, nation etc. LIKE WISE MILLIONS OF INDIAN PEOPLE HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO MASS KILLINGS, SEXUAL CRIMES, BARBARISM THROUGHOUT BY INDIANS FOR THE PAST 5000 YEARS IRRESPECTIVE OF RELIGION, LANGUAGE, CASTE, RACE, NATION ETC. THESE TYPES OF CRIMES HAPPENED THROUGHOUT THE WORLD IN THE PAST. Every ruler will erase the history of his crimes in the past. But after mid of 20th century, we have many countries with democratic governments. At present we have the Executive, Legislature and Supreme Court with good Press system to ensure democracy and dignity of the individual citizen. THERE ARE BEST, VERY GOOD, GOOD, MEDIUM, BAD, VERY BAD, WORST PEOPLE FROM EVERY RELIGION, LANGUAGE, CASTE, RACE, NATION ETC LIKE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION. THUS WE MUST NOT DEMONISE ANY RELIGION, LANGUAGE, CASTE, RACE, NATION ETC WHICH ARE MAN MADE. We all people of the world and our country have common ancestor and we all are relatives irrespective of religion, language, caste, race, nation etc. The scientists have confirmed this fact medically. So we must not do violence/kill our own human relatives for sake of religion, language, caste, race, nation etc.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
IndianIndian
Every body have migrated from other countries at different period
by IndianIndian on Apr 10, 2009 07:25 PM

Every body have migrated from other countries at different periods of time to India for the past 5000 years and intermingled with existing races
The option "no religion" has to be opted in all forms and census in India just like before 1830 when there was no census. The census should not ask for religion. We must not demonise any religion, language, caste, race, nation, status etc which are man made.We all people of the world and our country have common ancestor and we all are relatives irrespective of religion, language, caste, race, nation, status etc. The scientists have confirmed this fact medically. The people of India belong to different anthropological stocks. The population of India & Indian subcontinent is derived from six main ethnic groups and others: Negrito, Pro-Australoids, Mongoloids, Dravidian, Western Brachycephals, Nordics or Indo-Aryans etc etc settled from different times and now it is mixed race. So we must not do violence/kill our own human relatives for sake of religion, language, caste, race, nation, status etc. We have a secular constitution and all are equal. All Indian are sons of soil and original inhabitants of our Great Country India & have equal rights. Every body have migrated from other countries at different periods of time to India for the past 5000 years & intermingled with existing races & now it is a mixed race and vice versa. At different periods in History people had different types of worship. The Rules Against Community Crime Sh

    Forward  |  Report abuse
IndianIndian
Hindi people and Urudu people are relativesArtificiallyseperated
by IndianIndian on Apr 10, 2009 07:24 PM

Hindi people and Urudu people are relativesArtificiallyseperated
While, at the spoken level, Urdu and Hindi are considered dialects of a single language (or diasystem), they differ vastly in literary and formal vocabulary; where literary Urdu draws heavily on Persian and Arabic, literary Hindi draws heavily on Sanskrit and to a lesser extent Prakrit. The grammar and base vocabulary (most pronouns, verbs, adpositions, etc.) of both Urdu and Hindi, however, are the same and derive from a Prakritic base. The associated dialects of Urdu and Hindi are known as "Hindustani".
This shows the present day Hindi people and Urudu people are relatives artificially seperated by Relegions.. Also the Muslims of India are Original Sons of Soil forcefully or voluntarily became Muslims and They who are Original Indians and our relatives and should be treated equally, because they are sons of soil.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
IndianIndian
OTHER STATE PEOPLE WORK FEW YEARS & GO & DEVELOP THEIR OW
by IndianIndian on Apr 10, 2009 07:24 PM

OTHER STATE PEOPLE WORK FEW YEARS & GO & DEVELOP THEIR OWN STATE. GOVERNMENT MUST BRING NEW LAW WITHOUT AFFECTING THE EXISTING PEOPLE BY NONVIOLENCE
THE LOCALS SHOULD HAVE JOBS, LAND RIGHTS, AND BUSINESS ETC IN THEIR OWN STATE. OTHERS CAN WORK FEW YEARS AND CAN GO TO THEIR OWN STATE AND DEVELOP THEIR OWN STATE. Then only these other states will become developed states. THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT MUST BRING THIS AS NEW LAW WITHOUT AFFECTING THE EXISTING PEOPLE. This should be done by non-violence method. The locals are the people who are living in present date in that state till say as on date, 2008. The central government and state governments must ensure uniform economic growth throughout the nation. Fixed assets like house, land property limit can be made. Then India can prosper. In every state and central the community category 1, category 2, category 3, category 4, up to category 10, can be made for All job, education, business, land, house etc reservation depending upon the population and one category must not migrate to another category and everybody will have reservation. THE SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEME FOR FOOD, CLOTHES, AND SHELTER MINIMUM MUST BE ENSURED IN THE RESPECTIVE STATE BY CENTRAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT. Then all problems will be solved and in the long run we Indians can live peacefully. Article 370, LIKE FOR J & K AND HIMACHAL PRADESH MUST BE EXTENDED TO ALL STATES TO PROTECT TO PROTECT REGIONAL CULTURES


    Forward  |  Report abuse
IndianIndian
MAKING OF A MINORITY TO MAJORITY BY BRITISH FOR POLITICAL REASONS
by IndianIndian on Apr 10, 2009 07:23 PM

MAKING OF A MINORITY TO MAJORITY BY BRITISH FOR POLITICAL REASONS
Many thousands of different village religions (Entirely different from this Hindu Brahmanical Relegion) in India were artificially combined and the single digit Hindu Religion became double digit in the First British Census in 1830. The Aryans came to power on the Congress elephant by deviously converting the pre-independence political debate and struggle into a communal religious struggle. This was made possible by the master stroke of Mahatama Gandhi - who made "Hindus" a 55% majority on paper in the 1920s upon getting the Dalits or "untouchables" (20%) dubbed as "Hindus" by the British. This coup moved the "Hindus" from 35% to a 55% majority in British India . In pre-independence India, Muslims were 25%, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, Tribal Religions etc. formed the remaining 20%.This action along with recognition of Congress as the sole political representative of all Indians in national matters, was a payoff by the British colonial authorities to the Aryan lead Congress and Gandhi for loyal services rendered to British empire in supporting their World War I war effort; recruiting the "martial" communities (e.g. Sikhs, Jats, Rajputs, Gujars etc) of the northwest and Muslims to go fight for the British Empire in Europe/Middle east; subduing, opposing, infiltrating and sabotaging other non-Congress/non-Aryan lead political parties and independence movements organized at home (whosawBritishweaknessduringthe

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Prakash Negi
Communal Congress
by Prakash Negi on Apr 10, 2009 07:06 PM

When Manmohan Singh says "Muslims have the first right over funds" it is not communal. When PCC chief of AP says "I will cut the hand of the person who points a finger at the minorities", this is not communal. But when Varun Gandhi tries to assauge the feelings of Hindus in UP whose daughters are raped and temples demolished by fundamentalists, it becomes communalism. If Hindus have been ethinically cleansed in Kashmir, it is not communalism. Strange are the laws of Congress pseudos who sing its praise on their Italian master. It is a surprise to read even the so called intellectuals talking in this language. They seem to have abdicated their religion, culture and dharma which has always treated all human beings as equal but never compromised with terror and injustice.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
jack
nation
by jack on Apr 10, 2009 07:01 PM

when advaniji called you for live debate why did you run away like coward and now you spew venom thro speach.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Stellar
How does soniajee speak now?
by Stellar on Apr 10, 2009 06:58 PM

hvnt heard her speeches lately. Is her Hindi improving?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 69 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Write a message