Does the congress have exact figures on swiss money?? How can they comment that the figures are incorrect, until verified ?? It is the duty of congress to counter Advani's figures with exact information instead of simply saying it as a total hoax. The congress never said a word on the issue of swiss (or other) black money in the past and also never raised it's finger to bring back this money. If BJP is saying that they will find and bring the swiss money back, Let the congress also make it clear that they will do the same as BJP, if voted to power. Why and Whom are they afraid of....???
Re: Swiss money of Indians
by Gautam Sinha on Apr 08, 2009 08:49 PM
It is a factually critical letter, because Advaniji quoted sources from wikipedia, which can be edited by anyone and thus unverified. Also the focus point of the letter is that Advani never did anything about it but wants Congress to do something about it. All money in Swiss bank is not black and if they are black as Advani's speech points out to be, then why did BJP accept donations from those sources? Jairam Ramesh will not make a non factual statement and surely he must have have read foreign remittence records of BJP donations. Frankly I don't like either Ramesh or Advani but I can say that Ramesh is more correct than Advani, this time.
Advaniji, with so many trying to call you a liar, you can prove all of them wrong in one shot by taking a narco analysis/lie detector test at an independent centre and prove all your detractors wrong for ever. Since there is a BJP govt in power in Bangalore,we wonder if you can take this test elsewhere.
Mr. Ramesh must have get frustrated, because he must be having more money alone in Swiss Bank, then the total indian money claimed by Mr. Advani. As Mrs. Sonia belongs to Europe and her business contacts are in Europe, so Mr. Ramesh must be knowing how much money congress party leaders are having in Swiss Bank. Mr. Advani has no rights to think the Cogress party and the partymen poor. They must be having money worth many times higher than claimed by Mr. Advani.
Re: Ramesh must be saying...
by padman on Apr 30, 2009 06:13 AM
man if you have guts shout the same thing at street. Do you have dare? you will be booted like dog and you deserve it. If you have problem with our people, language, just get lost you motherfcker. i am keeping your comments. let all other read what you wrote. Who is selfish here, you come to our state, get job, use our water, living here and abuse our people. man like need to shot on your foul mouth and kick on your ball. just say what you wrote at public. We will see who is coward and useless.
Re: Ramesh must be saying...
by padman on Apr 30, 2009 06:15 AM
man if you have guts shout the same thing at street. Do you have dare? you will be booted like dog and you deserve it. If you have problem with our people, language, just get lost you motherfcker. i am keeping your comments. let all other read what you wrote. Who is selfish here, you come to our state, get job, use our water, living here and abuse our people. man like need to shot on your foul mouth and kick on your ball. just say what you wrote at public. We will see who is coward and useless.
Re: To all idiot cong supporters???
by SS Kumar on Apr 08, 2009 08:40 PM
You sound mentally sick. Every Indian life is precious, including Mehbooba's. Please realize the terrorists released by BJP were the ones who susbequently master-minded the attack on Mumbai on 26/11 and we probably lost 2- 3 times more people, including foreigners, compared to the 250 lives saved earlier. Do you realize how many more people have been left trauma-tized for the rest of their life by this experience ?. Get your facts straight first,brainless sissie.
Re: Re: To all idiot cong supporters???
by tiger on Apr 08, 2009 08:46 PM
Mr. Kumar Do you know, after release of terrorists in exchange of Mehbooba what happend, what was the result
? ? The result was present day kashmir (i.e. terrorist problem in kashmir)
Re: Re: Re: To all idiot cong supporters???
by SS Kumar on Apr 08, 2009 08:51 PM
Why do you conveniently overlook the more than half a dozen terrorists released by BJP safely escorted out of India by Jaswant Singh. They are the ones that attacked Mumbai as recent as 26/11. I am not condoning the release of terrorists for Mehbooba's release but that is history now.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: To all idiot cong supporters???
by SS Kumar on Apr 08, 2009 10:24 PM
Which ever party be in power, the security has to be top class and intending teerorists and hijackers must be nipped in the bud before they succeed in teir nefarious designs. GOI is doing the right thing by highly improving its intelligence network to be able to act proactively. This is what BJP should have done much earlier.
Re: Re: To all idiot cong supporters???
by Observer on Apr 08, 2009 08:54 PM
If you don't have will power to fight terrorism, terrorists will continue to strike whether two or three terrorists are released or not. This is what has been happening under UPA rule. 26/11 was UPA's government's failure.
Advani has not done anything useful during his stint as Home Minister. Did he do any police refoms, any improvement in the law & order, etc .. just nothing. He is a big zilch and just talks big. And to call Manmohan weak is rather foolish when the Loh Purursh himself has nothing to show off.
Manmohan has been asset to India from the day he became FM. Some might disagree of the reforms he has brought in but atleast he has acted. Action is always better than inaction the hallmark of LohPurush
Re: LohPurush is rusted junk Purush
by rajaneesh sar on Apr 08, 2009 08:25 PM
Sir ,
I hope you understand economics properly. If you analyze each aspect of the economy then you would realize how we have detoriated in these last 5 yrs. Look politicians donot formulate policies, its done by beaurocrats . Politicians only put their stamp on it but they need to be a good administrator, which unfortunately Mr Manmohan Singh is not. When your mind says something but u know that u have to follow someone else then you can never take any decision and thats the problem with Mr Singh. We need a PM who can be autocratic sometimes because any system in India is so fragile that without tough decisions india cannot grow.
Re: Re: LohPurush is rusted junk Purush
by SK B on Apr 14, 2009 01:20 PM
Sir, you are right the bureaucrats do all the work but the Minister is the one who provides the direction and is ultimately held responsible for any failure. We sure know that Ratan Tata did not make the Nano but he was the visionary for it.
Lets not deviate, Advani's only "achievement" is Babri Masjid demolition. He has nothing to show other than his ambition to be PM. If at all he becomes one he would be the most talkative PM with little or no action. MMS is a person of action the Nuclear Deal is a case in point, he put his govt. at stake to drive his vision. We want such people, the party is anyway being taken care by Sonia. MMS is CEO of India.
You don't have to worry about money Same standard for everyone high growth rate in your country(stalins regime 1948-1955 had 20% growth) Lots of occupations such as SEO worker, taxpeople, bank-mans wont be needed Unemployment = 0%
India needs a change. Both BJP and Congress have not done great . So, vote out BJP and Congress and give a chance to CPI(m)
Whatever genuine questions get raised on congress, we find a pattern in the way party answers - 1. Avoid direct answer 2. Question the cridentials of the questioner 3. Try to show that the issue is hyped-up 4. Show that others also did not do anything during their tenure
BUT NEVER GIVE STRAIGHT ANSWER TO ANY QUESTION. Kapil Sibbal is master of this technique!
