mr patel, kindly do some better work rather than wasting our as well as your time.. not expected from rediff... be careful while selecting the topics for discussion/debate
mr patel, kindly do some better work rather than wasting our as well as your time.. not expected from rediff... be careful while selecting the topics for discussion/debate
Sachin retired long back....still writer wish to put his views on Sachin...not on them who have a better average or any other factors...is itself suggest who is the genius?
every individual should be measured on what he did the best... say for example if we do not consider bradmans average.. he becomes a nobody.. same if six hitting is not considered as talent then gayle becomes a nobody.. here sachins speciality was his longevity and 100 centuries that makes him special and unique.. bradman didnt play 200 tests and even if he would have played he would never have averaged 99.
every individual should be measured on what he did the best... say for example if we do not consider bradmans average.. he becomes a nobody.. same if six hitting is not considered as talent then gayle becomes a nobody.. here sachins speciality was his longevity and 100 centuries that makes him special and unique.. bradman didnt play 200 tests and even if he would have played he would never have averaged 99.
every individual should be measured on what he did the best... say for example if we do not consider bradmans average.. he becomes a nobody.. same if six hitting is not considered as talent then gayle becomes a nobody.. here sachins speciality was his longevity and 100 centuries that makes him special and unique.. bradman didnt play 200 tests and even if he would have played he would never have averaged 99.
every individual should be measured on what he did the best... say for example if we do not consider bradmans average.. he becomes a nobody.. same if six hitting is not considered as talent then gayle becomes a nobody.. here sachins speciality was his longevity and 100 centuries that makes him special and unique.. bradman didnt play 200 tests and even if he would have played he would never have averaged 99.
every individual should be measured on what he did the best... say for example if we do not consider bradmans average.. he becomes a nobody.. same if six hitting is not considered as talent then gayle becomes a nobody.. here sachins speciality was his longevity and 100 centuries that makes him special and unique.. bradman didnt play 200 tests and even if he would have played he would never have averaged 99.
