They are waiting for IPL to get over and then they will decide which all players should be selected for the mega even after judging their performances in the IPL.
COA has no role and is not the appropriate body to run cricket. In 2014 ICC has agreed for a Revenue share and India contributes Lion's share in ICC Revenues. Shshank Manohar got into ICC thro BCCI and later sabotaged BCCI interests in getting himself elected as ICC Chairman. If Champions Trophy is important, ICC could have very well postponed Revenue Share matters after 2 months as suggested by BCCI. Why are they hurriedly breach existing MPA and bring something new, where we lose more than 50% COA has no role and their Job is to ensure Basic Financial discipline and accountability systems in place. What experience COA members have in promoting Cricket or getting Revenues to Cricket Board. They are acting like agents of ICC. Secondly if curbing corruption or enhancing Financial Discipline are the goals for COA where is the necessity for Age Cap etc. I am not a lawyer and legal experts should clarify if Courts can appoint Panels to run a Sport or a Society or even a Public Limited company where Public interest and money is involved, why not they run Mallaya empire, generate revenues and repay loans or run Olympic Association of India, where there were corruption charges or some Badminton or Volley Ball Associations. COA should stop Hand twisting BCCI and we should put pressure on ICC and BCCI is going in the right direction. After 3-4 years of following BCCI cases, there is not even a single charge of corruption on any office bearers of BCCI except betting as per Lodha Repor
Re: BCCI Vs ICC and COA
by dhananjay kritu on May 05, 2017 01:59 PM
This is the right thinking. COA has to only ensure no corruption, it cannot be thinking to run cricket which it knows nothing about
COA has no role and is not the appropriate body to run cricket. In 2014 ICC has agreed for a Revenue share and India contributes Lion's share in ICC Revenues. Shshank Manohar got into ICC thro BCCI and later sabotaged BCCI interests in getting himself elected as ICC Chairman. If Champions Trophy is important, ICC could have very well postponed Revenue Share matters after 2 months as suggested by BCCI. Why are they hurriedly breach existing MPA and bring something new, where we lose more than 50% COA has no role and their Job is to ensure Basic Financial discipline and accountability systems in place. What experience COA members have in promoting Cricket or getting Revenues to Cricket Board. They are acting like agents of ICC. Secondly if curbing corruption or enhancing Financial Discipline are the goals for COA where is the necessity for Age Cap etc. I am not a lawyer and legal experts should clarify if Courts can appoint Panels to run a Sport or a Society or even a Public Limited company where Public interest and money is involved, why not they run Mallaya empire, generate revenues and repay loans or run Olympic Association of India, where there were corruption charges or some Badminton or Volley Ball Associations. COA should stop Hand twisting BCCI and we should put pressure on ICC and BCCI is going in the right direction. After 3-4 years of following BCCI cases, there is not even a single charge of corruption on any office bearers of BCCI except betting as per Lodha Repor
COA has no role and is not the appropriate body to run cricket. In 2014 ICC has agreed for a Revenue share and India contributes Lion's share in ICC Revenues. Shshank Manohar got into ICC thro BCCI and later sabotaged BCCI interests in getting himself elected as ICC Chairman. If Champions Trophy is important, ICC could have very well postponed Revenue Share matters after 2 months as suggested by BCCI. Why are they hurriedly breach existing MPA and bring something new, where we lose more than 50% COA has no role and their Job is to ensure Basic Financial discipline and accountability systems in place. What experience COA members have in promoting Cricket or getting Revenues to Cricket Board. They are acting like agents of ICC. Secondly if curbing corruption or enhancing Financial Discipline are the goals for COA where is the necessity for Age Cap etc. I am not a lawyer and legal experts should clarify if Courts can appoint Panels to run a Sport or a Society or even a Public Limited company where Public interest and money is involved, why not they run Mallaya empire, generate revenues and repay loans or run Olympic Association of India, where there were corruption charges or some Badminton or Volley Ball Associations. COA should stop Hand twisting BCCI and we should put pressure on ICC and BCCI is going in the right direction. After 3-4 years of following BCCI cases, there is not even a single charge of corruption on any office bearers of BCCI except betting as per Lodha Repor
COA has no role and is not the appropriate body to run cricket. In 2014 ICC has agreed for a Revenue share and India contributes Lion's share in ICC Revenues. Shshank Manohar got into ICC thro BCCI and later sabotaged BCCI interests in getting himself elected as ICC Chairman. If Champions Trophy is important, ICC could have very well postponed Revenue Share matters after 2 months as suggested by BCCI. Why are they hurriedly breach existing MPA and bring something new, where we lose more than 50% COA has no role and their Job is to ensure Basic Financial discipline and accountability systems in place. What experience COA members have in promoting Cricket or getting Revenues to Cricket Board. They are acting like agents of ICC. Secondly if curbing corruption or enhancing Financial Discipline are the goals for COA where is the necessity for Age Cap etc. I am not a lawyer and legal experts should clarify if Courts can appoint Panels to run a Sport or a Society or even a Public Limited company where Public interest and money is involved, why not they run Mallaya empire, generate revenues and repay loans or run Olympic Association of India, where there were corruption charges or some Badminton or Volley Ball Associations. COA should stop Hand twisting BCCI and we should put pressure on ICC and BCCI is going in the right direction. After 3-4 years of following BCCI cases, there is not even a single charge of corruption on any office bearers of BCCI except betting as per Lodha Repor
COA has no role and is not the appropriate body to run cricket. In 2014 ICC has agreed for a Revenue share and India contributes Lion's share in ICC Revenues. Shshank Manohar got into ICC thro BCCI and later sabotaged BCCI interests in getting himself elected as ICC Chairman. If Champions Trophy is important, ICC could have very well postponed Revenue Share matters after 2 months as suggested by BCCI. Why are they hurriedly breach existing MPA and bring something new, where we lose more than 50% COA has no role and their Job is to ensure Basic Financial discipline and accountability systems in place. What experience COA members have in promoting Cricket or getting Revenues to Cricket Board. They are acting like agents of ICC. Secondly if curbing corruption or enhancing Financial Discipline are the goals for COA where is the necessity for Age Cap etc. I am not a lawyer and legal experts should clarify if Courts can appoint Panels to run a Sport or a Society or even a Public Limited company where Public interest and money is involved, why not they run Mallaya empire, generate revenues and repay loans or run Olympic Association of India, where there were corruption charges or some Badminton or Volley Ball Associations. COA should stop Hand twisting BCCI and we should put pressure on ICC and BCCI is going in the right direction. After 3-4 years of following BCCI cases, there is not even a single charge of corruption on any office bearers of BCCI except betting as per Lodha Repor
COA has no role and is not the appropriate body to run cricket. In 2014 ICC has agreed for a Revenue share and India contributes Lion's share in ICC Revenues. Shshank Manohar got into ICC thro BCCI and later sabotaged BCCI interests in getting himself elected as ICC Chairman. If Champions Trophy is important, ICC could have very well postponed Revenue Share matters after 2 months as suggested by BCCI. Why are they hurriedly breach existing MPA and bring something new, where we lose more than 50% COA has no role and their Job is to ensure Basic Financial discipline and accountability systems in place. What experience COA members have in promoting Cricket or getting Revenues to Cricket Board. They are acting like agents of ICC. Secondly if curbing corruption or enhancing Financial Discipline are the goals for COA where is the necessity for Age Cap etc. I am not a lawyer and legal experts should clarify if Courts can appoint Panels to run a Sport or a Society or even a Public Limited company where Public interest and money is involved, why not they run Mallaya empire, generate revenues and repay loans or run Olympic Association of India, where there were corruption charges or some Badminton or Volley Ball Associations. COA should stop Hand twisting BCCI and we should put pressure on ICC and BCCI is going in the right direction. After 3-4 years of following BCCI cases, there is not even a single charge of corruption on any office bearers of BCCI except betting as per Lodha Repor
COA has no role and is not the appropriate body to run cricket. In 2014 ICC has agreed for a Revenue share and India contributes Lion's share in ICC Revenues. Shshank Manohar got into ICC thro BCCI and later sabotaged BCCI interests in getting himself elected as ICC Chairman. If Champions Trophy is important, ICC could have very well postponed Revenue Share matters after 2 months as suggested by BCCI. Why are they hurriedly breach existing MPA and bring something new, where we lose more than 50% COA has no role and their Job is to ensure Basic Financial discipline and accountability systems in place. What experience COA members have in promoting Cricket or getting Revenues to Cricket Board. They are acting like agents of ICC. Secondly if curbing corruption or enhancing Financial Discipline are the goals for COA where is the necessity for Age Cap etc. I am not a lawyer and legal experts should clarify if Courts can appoint Panels to run a Sport or a Society or even a Public Limited company where Public interest and money is involved, why not they run Mallaya empire, generate revenues and repay loans or run Olympic Association of India, where there were corruption charges or some Badminton or Volley Ball Associations. COA should stop Hand twisting BCCI and we should put pressure on ICC and BCCI is going in the right direction. After 3-4 years of following BCCI cases, there is not even a single charge of corruption on any office bearers of BCCI except betting as per Lodha Repor
COA has no role and is not the appropriate body to run cricket. In 2014 ICC has agreed for a Revenue share and India contributes Lion's share in ICC Revenues. Shshank Manohar got into ICC thro BCCI and later sabotaged BCCI interests in getting himself elected as ICC Chairman. If Champions Trophy is important, ICC could have very well postponed Revenue Share matters after 2 months as suggested by BCCI. Why are they hurriedly breach existing MPA and bring something new, where we lose more than 50% COA has no role and their Job is to ensure Basic Financial discipline and accountability systems in place. What experience COA members have in promoting Cricket or getting Revenues to Cricket Board. They are acting like agents of ICC. Secondly if curbing corruption or enhancing Financial Discipline are the goals for COA where is the necessity for Age Cap etc. I am not a lawyer and legal experts should clarify if Courts can appoint Panels to run a Sport or a Society or even a Public Limited company where Public interest and money is involved, why not they run Mallaya empire, generate revenues and repay loans or run Olympic Association of India, where there were corruption charges or some Badminton or Volley Ball Associations. COA should stop Hand twisting BCCI and we should put pressure on ICC and BCCI is going in the right direction. After 3-4 years of following BCCI cases, there is not even a single charge of corruption on any office bearers of BCCI except betting as per Lodha Repor
