During interview shashtri was enjoying luxurious suit in Bangkok because without it he depressed, no one can permanently enjoying as team india coach,but shashtri want it seems
Both Ganguly and Shastri are master politicians. Both are sneaky and hit below the belt, as is their master BCCI. I personally have nothing to do with cricket nowadays. Total waste of time.
Shastri is a loud mouth...always wants to hog the limelight...what India needs is a real coach like wright or kirsten who work in the background and let the work speak for themselves..kumble fits the bill perfectly.
he has got brains and attitude, articulation to take the team to next level. kumble is in because of gandgulis politics. kumble is not even comparable.
Re: personally i prefer shastri over anyone else
by sourav saha on Jun 30, 2016 04:27 PM
Absolutely how come a great politician/duffer Ravi can be compared with a true fighter like Anil Kumble.
Re: personally i prefer shastri over anyone else
by Abhijit Joardar on Jun 30, 2016 04:35 PM
Ravi Shashtri may think everything will go as per his wish and that is why SG told Ravi is living in fool's world. Very true. Shashtri overestimated himself. There is no more Schindhia, by whose patronage Ravi in spite of being 'A Big Zero' enjoyed to remain in Indian cricket team. A Commentator's job is also enough for him. Ha.. ha.. ha..
Re: decision
by dost Mitra on Jun 30, 2016 04:14 PM
Correct. As we also thought why the News channels are not showing the scheme details & how to take the benefits of that scheme which government announces.
I think he is not. Consider that you are competing for a position in an organization which is richer than many countries, where you will stand to make millions, who will not try any way possible to upset the apple cart ? I would like to submit that almost all the people who applied for the position would put the money first, coaching for the nation next.
Re: Is Ravi Shastri a bad loser?
by Ganesh V on Jun 30, 2016 04:00 PM
The committee was formed to remove Shastri as BCCI would not have valid reasons to give to Shastri for his removal. The current president is master in politics and he knows how to get the work done without the need for BCCI getting bad name. Purely on records, Shastri has done well for the team.
Re: Re: Is Ravi Shastri a bad loser?
by DrYaako TikaNovva on Jun 30, 2016 06:31 PM
Done well for the team? Like the disastrous Bangladesh tour or losing to SA in the ODIs or the doctored pitches prepared to defeat SA? And what did our supreme leader do if Ravi did all the good things?
