I feel that inclusion of Robin Uttapha will boost the Indian batting line up along with extra wicket keeper. I feel sorry of Robin Uttapha after a good last session in India's one day and T-20 format. He did not get sufficient chance to get entry in the Indian team.
I feel that inclusion of Robin Uttapha will boost the Indian batting line up along with extra wicket keeper. I feel sorry of Robin Uttapha after a good last session in India's one day and T-20 format. He did not get sufficient chance to get entry in the Indian team.
Re: Replace Pandya
by Ganesh Samantray on Feb 02, 2016 09:46 AM
HARDIK PANDIYA IS A GOOD ALLROUNDER.HE SHOULD BE IN THE TEAM.YOU WILL HE WILL BE THE BEST ASSET OF INDIA IN FUTURE
Re: Replace Pandya
by Ganesh Samantray on Feb 02, 2016 09:46 AM
HARDIK PANDIYA IS A GOOD ALLROUNDER.HE SHOULD BE IN THE TEAM.YOU WILL HE WILL BE THE BEST ASSET OF INDIA IN FUTURE
Re: Players
by Hindustani on Feb 02, 2016 08:45 AM
Varun Aaron has pace, but doesn't have control over the bowl, he invariably bowls wayward & brainlessly & gives away lot of easy runs.
Shardul Thakur is very promising bowler & must get the chance but you can not experiment him now directly for world cup, he could prove a good prospect in long run & must be given chance so that he would be a good replacement for the likes of Bhuvaneshwar Kumar/ Umesh Yadav/ Aaron who all are bowling brainlessly & pathetically at the moment. Amit Mishra is a good bowler & could prove a match winner on his day & we need a quality leg-spinner in the side especially when the world cup is being played in subcontinent.
I am not too sure about Karn Sharma he looks an OK sort of bowler, nothing special or exciting about him, I would probably go with either Mishra, Pawan Negi who is an all rounder & in great form at the movement.
YUZWENDRA CHAHAL is another bowler who looked very good in IPL & India could try him opposite some weaker teams in future.
Re: Players
by Hindustani on Feb 02, 2016 08:46 AM
Varun Aaron has pace, but doesn't have control over the bowl, he invariably bowls wayward & brainlessly & gives away lot of easy runs.
Shardul Thakur is very promising bowler & must get the chance but you can not experiment him now directly for world cup, he could prove a good prospect in long run & must be given chance so that he would be a good replacement for the likes of Bhuvaneshwar Kumar/ Umesh Yadav/ Aaron who all are bowling brainlessly & pathetically at the moment. Amit Mishra is a good bowler & could prove a match winner on his day & we need a quality leg-spinner in the side especially when the world cup is being played in subcontinent.
I am not too sure about Karn Sharma he looks an OK sort of bowler, nothing special or exciting about him, I would probably go with either Mishra, Pawan Negi who is an all rounder & in great form at the movement.
YUZWENDRA CHAHAL is another bowler who looked very good in IPL & India could try him opposite some weaker teams in future.
Re: Players
by Hindustani on Feb 02, 2016 08:46 AM
Varun Aaron has pace, but doesn't have control over the bowl, he invariably bowls wayward & brainlessly & gives away lot of easy runs.
Shardul Thakur is very promising bowler & must get the chance but you can not experiment him now directly for world cup, he could prove a good prospect in long run & must be given chance so that he would be a good replacement for the likes of Bhuvaneshwar Kumar/ Umesh Yadav/ Aaron who all are bowling brainlessly & pathetically at the moment. Amit Mishra is a good bowler & could prove a match winner on his day & we need a quality leg-spinner in the side especially when the world cup is being played in subcontinent.
I am not too sure about Karn Sharma he looks an OK sort of bowler, nothing special or exciting about him, I would probably go with either Mishra, Pawan Negi who is an all rounder & in great form at the movement.
YUZWENDRA CHAHAL is another bowler who looked very good in IPL & India could try him opposite some weaker teams in future.
why rayudu is out from the squad,he is far better than rahane but team properly not giving chance that man,after doing unbeatn 124 against zimbawe,he has done 952runs avg.of45 in just 31 oneday matches rahane's avg is just 33 in oneday matches how he is a regular boy in playing xi,as like as rayudu how selection committee forget kedar yadav and his oneday 100 it is clearly injustice for rayudu and kedar
Re: about the selection of team
by Hindustani on Feb 02, 2016 12:35 AM
You can not compare Rahane with Rayudu & Kedar Jadhav. Rahane is far better batsman than those two.
Rahane is the MOST CONSISTENT batsman in Indian batting line up after Kohli, plus he is extremely good fielder, great catcher & very good in running between wickets. Whereas Rayudu is very ordinary fielder & very sluggish runner between wickets. Kedar Jadhav played well but he has very limited shots & can not be adjusted in already packed middle order, where we keep player like Pandey out.
Rahane's only weak point, if you may say so, is his not playing big shots or not rotate the strike more frequently, but if you had seen him playing in IPL for RR he was simply breath-taking with his consistency & amazed by his high strike rate & power heating as well. So, Rahane has already cemented his place in the side with his consistency & there is no question of keeping him out, as far as the average of ODI in concerned he was not great but not bad either, he was scoring run a bowl which was good. Rahane is feeling the vacuum created by the great Dravid, but he is more aggressive than Dravid, I am sure he will put his feet on the accelerator & go one step further as more aggressor.
Re: Re: about the selection of team
by ajaykumar lokhande on Feb 02, 2016 08:11 AM
very true. rayadu stands no chance before rahane. he is the only consistent player.
I sincerely think that MANISH PANDEY & PAWAN NEGI are far better choices than Gurkeerat Mann & Rishi Dhawan.
Manish Pandey has shown that he can handle pressure situations well & he has all cricketing shots under his arsenal & most importantly he is terrific fielder just like Kohli, Jadeja & Raina & in T-20 cricket ground fielding & catching wins you matches, so India somehow must play Pandey in the team, He should probably play in place of Hardik Pandya whose bowling did not looked promising, & Manish Pandey is far better batsman than Hardik Pandya.
Also, PAWAN NEGI is another player to watch out for, he was extremely impressive in IPL as a bowler & a very powerful striker.
