The petitioner & SC judges are paid by Lalit Modi & Pawar to remove Srinivasan & take control on Indian Cricket.SC judges need to give the ruling as per law and not as per media trails which is biased since he is from TN.
Re: Paid Case
by Shashidhara s on Dec 01, 2014 05:05 PM
is supreme court biased against raja?? is courts are biased against jayalalitha?? is courts are biased against marans?? is courts are biased against kani moli?? just because they are from TN....common my friend...be practical...
Re: Re: Paid Case
by jegadeesan durai on Dec 01, 2014 05:18 PM
Anything illegal to be punished. But here SC thinks that they can speak anything about items like conflict of interest. Can SC stop Ministers/MP having positions which invite conflict of interest ? There are numerous cases. Many players are employed by Air India and they may use those flights for travelling ? is it a conflict of interest ?
The petitioner & SC judges are paid by Lalit Modi & Pawar to remove Srinivasan & take control on Indian Cricket.SC judges need to give the ruling as per law and not as per media trails which is biased since he is from TN.
The petitioner & SC judges are paid by Lalit Modi & Pawar to remove Srinivasan & take control on Indian Cricket.SC judges need to give the ruling as per law and not as per media trails which is biased since he is from TN.
Re: Re: Paid Case
by jegadeesan durai on Dec 01, 2014 05:07 PM
Let the judges go by the law instead of giving comments. Why they are not giving comments in other cases involving politicians !
Let the full judgement come from the APEX court and then it will be known whether Dhoni has to resign or Mr Srinivasan to continue etc., It is subjudice to talk about ifs and buts at this stage. But people found guilty should have no place
The petitioner & SC judges are paid by Lalit Modi & Pawar to remove Srinivasan and take control on Indian Cricket.SC judges need to give ruling as per law and not as per media trails which is biased since he is from TN
