pure politics going on in the team .aaj in dono me se ek ko captain bana do phir tel aur tel ki dhar dheko. . harbhjan yuvi jaheer ashwin virat dhoni ke admi hai irfan fence sitter baki sachin side ke
Unfortunate, when a person is not of very sound technique and cannot adopt himself to situation and play, this is the result, one must be have a solid cricketing skills, not that Sehawag has less of it, but he is not consistent, just goes for the swing of bat at will, if he is lucky one day, he will survive, and mostly these days he is not.
Playing according to the merit of the ball, is a must, patience is next key, wait for opportunities, and seize them to make runs, and more over, he becomes over enthusiastic when he gets a couple of 4s and starts to swing the bat, Luck can take a person to some extent but cant keep him at the top always.
Unfortunate, when a person is not of very sound technique and cannot adopt himself to situation and play, this is the result, one must be have a solid cricketing skills, not that Sehawag has less of it, but he is not consistent, just goes for the swing of bat at will, if he is lucky one day, he will survive, and mostly these days he is not.
Playing according to the merit of the ball, is a must, patience is next key, wait for opportunities, and seize them to make runs, and more over, he becomes over enthusiastic when he gets a couple of 4s and starts to swing the bat, Luck can take a person to some extent but cant keep him at the top always.
Shewag is a match winner and there is nothing to worry on his age or form. He has proved himself all forms of game. Fix Rohit sharma and other drags first. He can score against England, Australia or any body any time.
Re: Shewag's form
by V SR on Sep 21, 2012 10:58 AM
True. He is like Hayden or Gilchrist, who always defies their age. Only in India, our guys feel that few failures and above 35, we say he is OLD. When a 21 years players fails, are we going to say he is too YOUNG to play?
Re: breaking news
by Sharanu on Sep 21, 2012 09:56 AM
badri is already there in test team we need failure from pujari which is bound to happen very soon against quality attack of england. and mukund will replace the ever failing gambhur
neelam ipl is just a league .... if playing for india he cant never prodeuce that performence...there is lot of world class bowlers..in ipl more domestic bowlers
Re: Re: huge difference ipl vs int t20
by aishwarya v on Sep 21, 2012 01:05 PM
Have you gone Mad. This Murali vijay is a low class player, who struggles to play fast bowling. He has had enough chances from Tamil biased shrikanth. Just wait once srikant is gone, all these vijay, badri and mukund will not find places in zonal level also. THey desrve it. Learn about cricket first Neelamegham before commeting.
Re: Re: Re: huge difference ipl vs int t20
by Neelamegham on Sep 21, 2012 01:11 PM
You are a mad. Vijay has record better than your Sehwag or Gambhir nowadays. Badri is an excellent IPL player but given chance only in 1 match. Even in that, he was top scorer. You first learn cricket before telling me.
Re: Re: Re: Re: huge difference ipl vs int t20
by aishwarya v on Sep 21, 2012 01:16 PM
They are fit to play only in IPL pitches. Murali vijay being compared to sehwag is laughable. this vijay is fit for gully cricket. dont ever dream that tese vijay and badri will play for india in future. they will pack up once srikanth is out as cheif selectors.first try to think as indian then a tamilian, then you will know the truth.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: huge difference ipl vs int t20
by Neelamegham on Sep 21, 2012 01:19 PM
first leave your tamil hatredness. If Rohit Sharma can be called a good batsman, Badrinath & Vijay are 10000 times better.
Re: Re: huge difference ipl vs int t20
by eminent on Sep 21, 2012 09:36 AM
they already got many chances so y cant they satisfy selectors?? y they not performed well? y badri cant score any century yet?
Re: Re: huge difference ipl vs int t20
by Sharanu on Sep 21, 2012 09:37 AM
people supporting harbhajan should also remember that he chickened out from bowling the last over to misbah ulhaq in the first world cup
Re: Re: Re: huge difference ipl vs int t20
by Neelamegham on Sep 21, 2012 09:40 AM
Well said Sharanu. If Harbhajan not bowl that badly, Pakistan could not go to winning situation.
Re: Re: Re: Re: huge difference ipl vs int t20
by eminent on Sep 21, 2012 09:44 AM
if harbhajan not took the hatrick in the famous kolkatta test...india cant win that match...so if u have past performence i have also past performence dont forget that
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: huge difference ipl vs int t20
by Sharanu on Sep 21, 2012 09:53 AM
it was only due to that bengalis influence he was there. the hattrick was a fluke just as kumblis 10 wkts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: huge difference ipl vs int t20
by Neelamegham on Sep 21, 2012 09:56 AM
Eminent, Kapil scored 175 against Zimbabwe in 1983. if that is a past performance, even Harbhajan's fluke hatrick, Kumble's fluke 10 wickets is also past performance.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: huge difference ipl vs int t20
by Sharanu on Sep 21, 2012 10:17 AM
that test was won not of kumblis 10wkts but bcos of an excellent innings of 95 by sadagopan Ramesh
Re: arrogant sehwag
by Neelamegham on Sep 21, 2012 09:29 AM
Also Gambhir play drama last year saying he was injured and ran away from England, but played champions league. He is a cheat.
Virender Sehwag is a world class batsman with unique Test and one day records. He has two triple hundred and several double hundreds in Test cricket, and has the the highest score in 50 overs. He must be considered an all time great player, and Sanath Jayasuria is correct in his assessment. Furthermore, he can also defend his wicket and play a long innings. People should be moronic in their outlook to have him replaced by a second-rate rate batsman like Murali Vijay.
Re: Sehwag is good
by Neelamegham on Sep 21, 2012 09:27 AM
Kapil Dev is a world class all rounder with best possible records and talent. So, he also should be retained??
Re: Sehwag is good
by Neelamegham on Sep 21, 2012 09:30 AM
Report it 100 times, i will posted it again. Kapil Dev is a world class all rounder with best possible records and talent. So, he also should be retained??
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sehwag is good
by eminent on Sep 21, 2012 09:41 AM
they will play well neelam..wait and see...they will be in team for 3 to 4 more years more then badri will be 38 years of age then we can consider him okkk dont be sad