i like the posts belowwhere solid singh says that tendulakr has been appointed as brand ambassador for " Kohinoor" brand 'plastics'( prevent birth control) & the punch line reads
Re: Re: Re: tendukar
by Against Pseudos on Mar 28, 2012 12:27 PM
;-).. Pity you have to make this comments on Rahul Dravid's felicitation article.. . It brings back some unwanted memories of England tour unfortunately.. :)
Re: Re: Re: Re: tendukar
by Against Pseudos on Mar 28, 2012 12:44 PM
;-)... After all Sa Chin's illogical mind WILL work like Bronze Money's... let's understand that .. :)
Re: Re: Re: Re: tendukar
by sachin on Mar 28, 2012 12:54 PM
pls also pity your master / employer's name . he haqs kept you in his restaurant & paying you money. show some respect to him & his namesake.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: tendukar
by bhunu pro on Mar 28, 2012 12:57 PM
you really born 20 years earlier than tendulkar ? hahah at the age of 58 u should be busy in self realisation..not wasting time in this illogical dicussions by some ppl ..
Re: Against Pseudos=bhunu pro=agents
by silver mani on Mar 28, 2012 12:16 PM
U r right ,tendu give them 10 Rs per day,how about i give them 10.50 Rs per day,I Am sure then they will switch the sides..lol..
The sad story isnât restricted to just ODI Cricket, it gets even worse when it comes to Test Cricket where India is the number one team right now. Out of his 51 Test centuries; only 20 times India won, 11 times India lost and 20 times it was drawn.
Sachin Tendulkarâs winning percentage of centuries in Test Cricket is only 39.21. And if we exclude his 8 centuries against Zimbabwe and Bangladesh then, out of his 43 Test centuries, only 14 times India won. If we compare his this stat with one of his contemporaries from Pakistan, i.e Inzamam-ul-Haq, then some readers might get a shock to see Inzamam-ul-Haq scored 25 Test centuries; 17 times Pakistan won, 6 times drawn and only 2 times Pakistan lost. Inzamamâs winning percentage of centuries is 68.
Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by bhunu pro on Mar 28, 2012 11:31 AM
So PAKISTAN had 3rd class bowling and Indian team always equipped with world class bowlers ? :)
Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by bhunu pro on Mar 28, 2012 11:33 AM
and if you have good memory..just check Paksitan won the asia cup final because of batsman or bowlers ? ridiculous batting they had !!
Re: Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by silver mani on Mar 28, 2012 11:39 AM
Bondu,check my stats for Lara who played for WI with the most weak team and bowlers,how come he has better per entage of centuries in Winning.Now dont tell me Lara had marshall,Garneretc.Also can u explain for jayasurya as SL bowling is as pathetic as india.Now Dont tell me Murali used to bowl all 50 overs for them.
Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by silver mani on Mar 28, 2012 11:49 AM
Bondu,so why Lara and Jayasurya has more centuries in winning cause,Now dont tell me Murali used to bowl 50 overs for SL And Marshall,garner,Ambrose played till 2008.Lol..
Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by Against Pseudos on Mar 28, 2012 11:44 AM
Stands TALL? His winning percentage is 41 against Sachin's 39... Is 2% better performance filed under the category of STANDING TALL? :)
As Bronze Money highlighted, Inzamam is probably world's greatest cricketer and Dravid is nothing in front of Inzamam.. :)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by Against Pseudos on Mar 28, 2012 11:57 AM
Hi Undies:
When your drug adduced sleep is over, please clarify what you have typed above... 68 is NOT equal to 41.. Hence Inzamam is way way superior to Dravid - is what I said...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by silver mani on Mar 28, 2012 12:03 PM
So Tendus performnce is judged by dravids , good, so when is bharat Ratan due for Dravid... Lol..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by bhunu pro on Mar 28, 2012 12:05 PM
Naag mani.. No issues if Dravid gets Bharat Ratna.. Raise that request pls.. I will support that as well :)..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by bhunu pro on Mar 28, 2012 12:17 PM
NAAGMANI :: better match winner ? shows ur ignorance.. take all the runs in consideration and not just centuries..
Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by silver mani on Mar 28, 2012 11:43 AM
Against undies,I want Sachin to obsess with centuries but only Match Winning ones not Selfish and Match Loosing Lol..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by silver mani on Mar 28, 2012 12:09 PM
Against undies,dont worry about Dravid ,he is history now,just advice ur fake god to improve his Match loosing innings ,as he still have gokd 20 years left in him.Lol.
Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by sachin on Mar 28, 2012 11:42 AM
golden ,
Imran khan has gone on record to say that brian lara was the greatest batsman he bowled to & therewas no better timer of the ball than Inzmam ul haq.
Inzmam had the ability to turn the match on its head. Pak was nowhere in 1992 wc having lost to india & a couple of games drawn due to rain. but inzi destroyed NZ & Eng with his batting & got the cup for Pak. How many such innings The plastic baba has played??
He has only played one in his entire career - match agaonst bangla where he took them to the finals
Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by bhunu pro on Mar 28, 2012 11:45 AM
if u have Ghajini problem.. then lemme remind you about 96 wc and 2003 wc.. and who is Imran ? forget abt his wc vicotry..just imagine him as a bowler..mcgrath/warne were better than him.. and they consider sachin greater :)
Re: Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by Ramesh Choudhary on Mar 28, 2012 11:48 AM
Against Pseuidos===bhunu pro===TRAITOR====WAITER in sachins restaurant===Rs 10/day service
Re: Re: Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by bhunu pro on Mar 28, 2012 11:49 AM
You have wronfg notion of thinking that youc an always use the above line as Brahmastra .. in actuall its a fussss bomb :)
Re: Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by silver mani on Mar 28, 2012 11:57 AM
Bhundu,U clown,Mcgrath has always stated Lara was better than Sachin.Check rediff March,2007 Article written by Mcgrath"Lara is just ahead of Sachin".
Re: Re: Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by bhunu pro on Mar 28, 2012 12:02 PM
and he even quoted.. he has got better hold of Lara than Sachin :) since he found him weak arnd off stump !!
Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by bhunu pro on Mar 28, 2012 11:48 AM
It is like saying since Priyanka Chopra did excellemt acting in Fashion (won national award).. she is better actress than Waheeda Rahman :)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by bhunu pro on Mar 28, 2012 11:56 AM
read the above carefully what I have said.. but before that change your name pls .. :)
Re: Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by silver mani on Mar 28, 2012 12:23 PM
Sachin ,Imran once said that Technically Sachin is better than inzi but Tempramentally(ability to perform under pressure)Inzi is miles ahead of Sachin..
Re: Inzmam vs Sachin
by koni on Mar 28, 2012 12:30 PM
Sachin bradman puh who , sachin without any doubt.
Sachin 32000 runs. Bradman 6000 runs.
Sachin 269 sixes. Bradman 6 sixes.
Sachin played all three formats of cricket. Bradman played just one format with just 52 matches.
Sachin played on 90 pitches. Bradman played on 7 pitches.
Sachin played against 13 teams. Bradman played against 4 teams.
Sachin played 650 matches. Bradman played just 52 matches.
Sachin took 200 wickets. Bradman took 2 wickets.
sachin played walsh ambros akram mcgrath warne murli etc bradman played larwood only
sachin time video analysis for batsman shortcomings technolgy bradman no such
Bradman's contribution is less than 18% contribution of Sachin to CRICKET. Hats off to master blaster.
Thanx to everyone for participation in pretty easy question.
@SelfishBradman Yeah, there were no jets in 1930s. Thats not the fault of Sachin. Bradman played in that era where there were no techniques available to know weaknesses of batsman. On the other side before every series opposition does special homework for Sachin to take his wicket as early as possible. Yeah, there was only one format in 1930, thats not fault of Sachin again. In Sachin's era three formats were available and he played every format with consistency and brilliance. Yeah, there were less test playing nations in comparison to today which means less variety of oppositions which helps to boost your average.
Lot of people say that due to Indiaâs weak bowling attack in Tendulkarâs era, his centuries never helped India winning. Lets analyze whether this excuse is vindicated or not, we will have a look at some of Tendulkarâs contemporaries who played with same co-called weak bowling line. Remember Tendulkarâs winning percentage of centuries is 68.75.
- Saurav Ganuguly: 22 ODI centuries, 18 times India won. Winning percentage of centuries is 81.81 - Virender Sehwag: 14 ODI Centuries, 13 times India won. Since 2003, his all 13 centuries have been match winning. Winning percentage of centuries is 92.85. - Yuvraj Singh: 12 ODI Centuries, 9 times India won. Winning percentage of centuries is 75.00 - MS Dhoni: 7 ODI Centuries, 6 times he was on winning-end.
Re: Sachin has Worst Record of percentage centuries in a win
by silver mani on Mar 28, 2012 11:24 AM
Sachin Tendulkarâs contemporaries from World.
1. Brian Lara: 19 ODI Centuries, 16 times West Indies won. Winning percentage of centuries is 84.21 2. Sanath Jayasuriya: 28 ODI centuries, 24 times Srilanka won. Winning percentage of centuries is 85.71 3. Saeed Anwar: 20 ODI centuries, 16 times Pakistan won. Winning percentage of centuries is 80.00
Re: Re: Sachin has Worst Record of percentage centuries in a win
by silver mani on Mar 28, 2012 11:25 AM
Out of Sachin Tendulkarâs 33 match winning centuries, 9 are against minnows; Zimbabwe, Namibia and Kenya. If we exclude his 10 centuries(against minnows) then his winning percentage of centuries is only 63.15
Re: Re: Re: Sachin has Worst Record of percentage centuries in a
by bhunu pro on Mar 28, 2012 11:29 AM
so its HIS winning % ..not the team :) .. saluting you !!
Sachin has scored 5 centuries against Pakistan in ODIs and Only 1 Century resulted in Indian Victory ,Rest 4 Pakistan Won.The only winning century he scored was in 1996 in Sharjah against Pak.No doubt he has the World Record of most number of centuries in a loosing cause.
