BCCI officers are asking Sachin how much matches he needs to play more so the remaining records can be transferred in his personal name. They might propose throwing away the record books as all figures will name only one player in the world. All 1000 other players will be duds.
The officers of BCCI have broken world record by allowing a single player to hold all records of cricket. We now do not need any record book since it has become useless as record cannot be broken.Records of other players should now be deleted and should not be decent like those done by Lara, Richardson, Ricky Ponting, Dravid and other players who were very graceful and could have made more runs by playing continuously. Allowing one player to break all records is itself a very supporting factor. The officers who facilitated this were in fact the real record breakers because they gave preference to one batsman to play over riding other players.
it's a answer for the people who always alleged him as he played for his record but some record like 50th 100,96*(50)still remain unfulfilled as he walked away from ODI i ll miss the legend whom i saw from my childhood batting marvelously and only a name by which i know abt cricket
Re: he played for his country not for his own record
by INDEPENDENT INDIA on Dec 24, 2012 08:43 PM
The officers of BCCI have broken world record by allowing a single player to hold all records of cricket. We now do not need any record book since it has become useless as record cannot be broken.Records of other players should now be deleted and should not be decent like those done by Lara, Richardson, Ricky Ponting, Dravid and other players who were very graceful and could have made more runs by playing continuously. Allowing one player to break all records is itself a very supporting factor. The officers who facilitated this were in fact the real record breakers because they gave preference to one batsman to play over riding other players.
