India to host Bangladesh in Test series

Re: tendulkar the selfish accumulator of runs by prashant chaudhary on Apr 10, 2012 04:21 PM yes you are right as per this ajit agarkar is best batsman in the world six ducks in a consecutive innings so he dont have quantity but has quality hahahah    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: tendulkar the selfish accumulator of runs by Against Pseudos on Apr 11, 2012 05:58 AM Dubbe: Well said. Even Bradman proved that with his near 100 average (quantity). ;-)    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: And why does Sachin selfish tendulkar by rajkamal dubey on Apr 10, 2012 03:34 PM And just before that, he played for almost a year without a century ...remember that agonizing wait from 99th to 100th ??    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: And why does Sachin selfish tendulkar by sri dg on Apr 10, 2012 04:04 PM this rediff has blocked a fitiing reply that i have goven to sri raj dubey    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Re: And why does Sachin selfish tendulkar by bhunu pro on Apr 10, 2012 04:50 PM ok.. u mised CB series in between.. and ignored the fact of missing WI tour..    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: And why does Sachin selfish tendulkar by Muhammed on Apr 10, 2012 06:17 PM Yeah seen SRT's performance in CB series - playing meekly. When Virat can score a century in Australia, wonder what stopped this so called best batsmen to perform?? Instead like a handicap person he chose Bangladesh to score his maha shatak, which meant India had to loose that Match    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: And why does Sachin selfish tendulkar by bhunu pro on Apr 10, 2012 06:28 PM Yes Mehmood.. based on CB series performance more than half of the team shud be kicked out :) .. but that cnat happen..so lets go much earlier than that and anlsyse for past1-2 years.. give it thorough study and come up wiuth the loist.. u will urslef get the answer who peroformed and who not.. hmm..well last heard that jadeja will be playing all the ODI series this year.. is it true ? ;-)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: And why does Sachin selfish tendulkar by Against Pseudos on Apr 11, 2012 05:56 AM Muha med: And Kohli too chose the wrong matches to score his centuries. Which meant that we were kicked out of both tournaments. ;-)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: And why does Sachin selfish tendulkar by Muhammed on Apr 11, 2012 01:53 PM At least u should know, the matches in which Kohli scored century, India Won, while SRT's painstaking 100 meant both - Indian defeat in that match and also eviction from tournament.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And why does Sachin selfish tendulkar by bhunu pro on Apr 11, 2012 08:35 PM haha Muhammed .. actually when Kohli scored..India never made to finals ..hows that ?? :) Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: yippee by prashant chaudhary on Apr 10, 2012 04:18 PM Srt has only 1 hundred in ODI against Bangladesh    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: Yippee! #101, 102, 103 by Against Pseudos on Apr 10, 2012 03:17 PM Well said. Other Indian "batsmen" would flop as usual. Right?? ;-)    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: Botox Bhaabhi by Against Pseudos on Apr 10, 2012 03:12 PM Good. Please tell this to the Sachin haters on the forum who think Sachin is going to score 10 centuries in 5 innings. ;-)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator

Re: Just by Against Pseudos on Apr 10, 2012 02:44 PM :-).. No tribute to South Africa for allowing century #99? ;-)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Just by rajkamal dubey on Apr 10, 2012 02:54 PM No, 100th is more important than the 99th you idiot....at least symbolically...and for a nation that depends on symbolism and useless paper heroes like selfish tendulkar, you can well imagine !!!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Just by ashish sahu on Apr 10, 2012 03:07 PM Then what about 50th test century against SA, Rajkamal you fool. It also looks symbolically important.:)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Just by Against Pseudos on Apr 10, 2012 03:15 PM Dubbe: Ok. So keep ranting on the 100th. ;-) BTW who else has scored 99th against South Africa??    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Just by rajkamal dubey on Apr 10, 2012 03:20 PM who else has played for 23 long years (denying deserving youngsters their chance)?    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just by bhunu pro on Apr 10, 2012 05:02 PM so there should be a retirement time for each cricketer that noone should play more than 10 years ? irresoective of when u r staring? so actually why dravid played for 16 years.. he shud have retored in 2005 itself.. and Kohili shud be retired staright away to give an under19 player their chances,. and someday players would retire befoe actually start playing :) Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just by Against Pseudos on Apr 11, 2012 05:53 AM Dubbe: Well said. No one can play for so long like a champion. :-) Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Just by wyakthoo on Apr 10, 2012 03:03 PM apt words...dinker    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator

Re: Grt news for UNCLE by Against Pseudos on Apr 10, 2012 02:50 PM Yes. Meanwhile Ponting continues his single digit scores. ;-)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Grt news for UNCLE by rajkamal dubey on Apr 10, 2012 02:56 PM why this necessity to bring in Ponting everytime ppl speak about tendulkar?...so you consider him a threat indeed ???...but CA will never gift Ponting free matches against minnows to ramp up his figures    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Grt news for UNCLE by Against Pseudos on Apr 10, 2012 03:16 PM Dubbe: ;-).. Well said. When discussing Sachin, useless single digit scorers like Ponting should be excluded from the discussion. My apologies. ;-)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Grt news for UNCLE by bhunu pro on Apr 10, 2012 05:04 PM Dubey Ji.. You forgot Ponting was given chance against minnows to improve his form.. that was India .Somehow even Indian knew this that he would be back in form :)    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: Nothing new by bhunu pro on Apr 10, 2012 02:31 PM if 1 match decides the ratings then many would have surpassed bradman in terms of avg :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Nothing new by Demons on Apr 10, 2012 02:40 PM His highes 242, came against Zimbo! By the way, are u good lookin'? [juslikethat, :-)]    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Nothing new by bhunu pro on Apr 10, 2012 02:43 PM yes let it be if his highest is against Zimbo :) .. Yes I am good lukking.. but our pics looks same :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Nothing new by Demons on Apr 10, 2012 02:43 PM I mean, I'm not bad.. Girls do find me "Acceptable"    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Nothing new by bhunu pro on Apr 10, 2012 02:44 PM then apologies.. am straight !! but u can always love Tendulkar ;-)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Nothing new by Against Pseudos on Apr 10, 2012 02:51 PM De Mons: ???? Wotz your rating system??    Forward   |   Report abuse