Now that we have reached to the knock out stages the team that keeps cool head will win. PAK Vs WI: PAK is unpredictable team , they might have been beaten AUS but Gayle and Roach back in Team WI can beat them. India VS AUS: India is the only team which struggled in all the matches and never write AUS off any time. AUS bowling attack and the depth in Batting will come in handy, Yuvraj always fails when needed to it would be AUS unless they have a bad day NZ VS SA:
NZ could not have asked for a better team than SA to face, they can not play SPIN thats the only weakness in this team of allrounders. Players playing with limited talent but good attitude NZ can beat SA,who always fail when it matters
SL VS England I pick England because of their confidence ,only team which has been tested in this world cup and who never lost easily.
The best team for the game against Australia is 1. Sewhag. 2. Tendulkar. 3. Virat Kolhi. 4. Raina. 5. Yuvraj Singh. 6. Yusuf Pathan. 7. Dhoni. 8. Ashwin. 9. &nb sp; Zaheer. 10. Harbhajan. 11. S reesanth.
1. Raina should be retained in the place of Gautham Gambhir, who is out of form since September-2009. Also, Raina is a better fielder & useful bowler than Gambhir. 2. Raina should be sent ahead of Yuvraj Singh because Yuvraj has played only against the weaker teams & he cannot force the pace in the middle overs that too against Australian bowlers. 3. Yusuf Pathan should be sent when spinners (Kreja) or Shane Watson operate because he can handle them easily & not in the power plays when Lee or Tait is operating. 4. Munaf patel should in now way be selected because he does not know to Bat, Field or Bowl. In comparison, Sreesanth is a better fielder than Munaf, can score at least 2 runs/hang around & is a much more aggressive/strike bowler than Munaf/Nehra. 5. Also, Ashwin who is a better batsman than Harbhajhan Singh & Zaheer should be sent after Dhoni. 6. Power plays should be taken in-between the 35th & 45th overs when players like Yuvraj or Dhoni are batting, who will not get out irrespective of the run rates required. Dhoni in particular who will score 12 out of 30 balls whether in the power plays or not in the power plays.
If, Dhoni sheds his EGO & selects from a team persp
Re: PLEASE SELECT THE TEAM FOR INDIA:
by chindhee chor on Mar 21, 2011 01:11 PM
you better do the job of coconut selling rather than putting your mindless thoughts on this board...
Re: Re: PLEASE SELECT THE TEAM FOR INDIA:
by jack d on Mar 21, 2011 01:15 PM
shreesanth is a better bowler than munaf........hahahahahahahahahahahahahah..... man you are so funny. go and join comedy circus with this plan of yours.
Re: PLEASE SELECT THE TEAM FOR INDIA:
by Maihoon Don on Mar 21, 2011 01:33 PM
you can never be a captain or a selector. no one should play around with the team's composition at this stage of the tournament.
Without doubting Gambhir's ability, I guess Dhoni has to take a big decision & drop Gambhir to get a best Team Combination for this world cup. Gambhir is an excellent Opening batsman & has a bright furture but as Sehwag & Sachin are starting the Innings for India & Virat Kohli has perforemd better at number 2, India should play Suresh Raina in the Middle rather than Gautam Gambhir. Gambhir has always done well for India but considering such a big tournament, India should play according to the Situation. Also I would love to see Sreesanth instead of Munaf as he is an aggressive Player & will help the team when they are down.
India has same chances of world cup having others. India won 4 match, tie one and loss one match by just one bad over from Nehra at the end.
Except Pakistan and S Africa who really played well in whole series?
Ausi Win against Kenya ( Who loss all 6 match ), agianst Canada ( who only won against Kenya ), agaisnt Zimababwe ( who won against Kenya and canada ) they lost against pakistan, Srilanka luckily match called off...
Same for Pakistan and Srilanka... Group B was poor compare to Group A
In group A england loss against Irland and Bangladesh... won hardly against S Africa....
West indies won only 3 match...
So u can not ignore Indian winning like we are winning with luck.. there is some problem in loosing wickets fast but look at another angle.. even we loosing such wicket we are making more then 270-280...
Ausi is not in form at all.... India will beat them...
Media and people are reacting like india must score 350 in every match and win it by 200 runs...
if India batting second then make opponent all out in 100 runs and win match by 10 wickets... thats not possible because they are also team of good players...
If people and media feel India is not going to win WC then who is must winner? England? W.I.?
At this point it looks like Pakistan and S Africa have better chances and then India or Srilanka.
India has same chances of world cup having others. India won 4 match, tie one and loss one match by just one bad over from Nehra at the end.
Except Pakistan and S Africa who really played well in whole series?
Ausi Win against Kenya ( Who loss all 6 match ), agianst Canada ( who only won against Kenya ), agaisnt Zimababwe ( who won against Kenya and canada ) they lost against pakistan, Srilanka luckily match called off...
Same for Pakistan and Srilanka... Group B was poor compare to Group A
In group A england loss against Irland and Bangladesh... won hardly against S Africa....
West indies won only 3 match...
So u can not ignore Indian winning like we are winning with luck.. there is some problem in loosing wickets fast but look at another angle.. even we loosing such wicket we are making more then 270-280...
Ausi is not in form at all.... India will beat them...
Media and people are reacting like india must score 350 in every match and win it by 200 runs...
if India batting second then make opponent all out in 100 runs and win match by 10 wickets... thats not possible because they are also team of good players...
If people and media feel India is not going to win WC then who is must winner? England? W.I.?
At this point it looks like Pakistan and S Africa have better chances and then India or Srilanka.
India has same chances of world cup having others. India won 4 match, tie one and loss one match by just one bad over from Nehra at the end.
Except Pakistan and S Africa who really played well in whole series?
Ausi Win against Kenya ( Who loss all 6 match ), agianst Canada ( who only won against Kenya ), agaisnt Zimababwe ( who won against Kenya and canada ) they lost against pakistan, Srilanka luckily match called off...
Same for Pakistan and Srilanka... Group B was poor compare to Group A
In group A england loss against Irland and Bangladesh... won hardly against S Africa....
West indies won only 3 match...
So u can not ignore Indian winning like we are winning with luck.. there is some problem in loosing wickets fast but look at another angle.. even we loosing such wicket we are making more then 270-280...
Ausi is not in form at all.... India will beat them...
Media and people are reacting like india must score 350 in every match and win it by 200 runs...
if India batting second then make opponent all out in 100 runs and win match by 10 wickets... thats not possible because they are also team of good players...
If people and media feel India is not going to win WC then who is must winner? England? W.I.?
At this point it looks like Pakistan and S Africa have better chances and then India or Srilanka.
