If Yusuf was out for first ball then definitely we would not have won the match at all. It was only because his sudden sixes. Praising alone Yuraj is not apt. Let the credit go to Yusuf too.
Re: WHY NO PRAISE FOR BUTCHER YUSUF
by robbyrocket on Mar 07, 2011 01:19 PM
Truly speaking, without Pathan we are not going to win any match.Really why am saying because since NewZealand and South africa our top order is not doing so much to accelerate the run rate except Kholi and now Yuvraj.
Re: WHY NO PRAISE FOR BUTCHER YUSUF
by sri_niketh1946@rediffmail.com on Mar 07, 2011 03:51 PM
This is open secret that because of pathan only we have won the match let any body be the man of the match for me yusuf is the man of the match
Re: WHY NO PRAISE FOR BUTCHER YUSUF
by S Shrikanth on Mar 07, 2011 12:00 PM
167/5 after 40 overs and Yuvi on crease with asking rate 4 runs/over, there was no pressure on Pathan to hits his shots of a below average bowling attack.
If Yuvi had departed and another wicket gone, then Pathan would had been under pressure.
Re: Re: WHY NO PRAISE FOR BUTCHER YUSUF
by jas on Mar 07, 2011 01:01 PM
yup. No need to hurry. we should have tied to make the winning run in 50th over.
Re: Re: Re: WHY NO PRAISE FOR BUTCHER YUSUF
by sri_niketh1946@rediffmail.com on Mar 07, 2011 03:53 PM
if a wicket either of yuvi or pathan then where is 50th over we will be bundle our at 28th over itself
Re: Re: WHY NO PRAISE FOR BUTCHER YUSUF
by robbyrocket on Mar 07, 2011 01:20 PM
Shri..Check on some NZ,SA series..in much pressure how Pathan has batted earlier..then you power of Pathan..
Re: Re: Re: WHY NO PRAISE FOR BUTCHER YUSUF
by S Shrikanth on Mar 07, 2011 04:46 PM
But there was no pressure this time.Yuvi and Dhoni had already made it too easy.
Projection of a ball in the direction thru computer is wrong assumption. No computer can read the swing of the bowl, twist of the bowl, which edge of the bowl has hit the ground and mainly repulsive/acton/reaction/bounceeness of the bowl/wind effect etc. Mere projection of the line from the last point of hit is incorrect scientifically.
Re: UDRS FOR LBW IS INCORRECT
by Rajesh Gupta on Mar 07, 2011 11:48 AM
I am totally agree with you.. You can use it for No-ball, Wide ball (for height), catches, edges, runouts and stumpings...
Re: UDRS FOR LBW IS INCORRECT
by S Shrikanth on Mar 07, 2011 02:12 PM
I think you should request ICC to remove LBW. Because nobody - Umpire or Technology can determine if the ball was really going to hit the stumps.
Re: Afridi is the best all rounder
by A on Mar 07, 2011 12:29 PM
if anybody informs him about ball is sugar coated, then he will start biting that without hesitation.
yday he failed and the opposition dominated! if he would have stayed match would have been over around 35th over.but finishing the match earlier is not a criteria here,but if sehwag stays the pressure is on the opposition and he releases the pressure from the non striker as well and runs keep flowing!
Re: sehwag is a key man!
by Rajesh Gupta on Mar 07, 2011 11:40 AM
Rightly said! We need Sehwag or Sachin till the 45th over atleast.. for a good score over 320 plus..
Re: Re: if yuvraj not take wicktets
by vinprabhu11@rediffmail.com on Mar 07, 2011 11:26 AM
There is a proverb..If there was mustache to grandma she would be grandpa.. Be happy for what happened.. not what could happen..
Re: if yuvraj not take wicktets
by Mr Bean on Mar 07, 2011 11:26 AM
agreed!yuvi is a match winner,his form was very imp in this wc and good for us that he peaked in the right time
Re: EVEN KUMBLE WOULD HAVE BOWLED BETTER
by Mr Bean on Mar 07, 2011 11:22 AM
i can understand ur emotions,but bhajji is a world class spinner,though less effective in odi but he bowled well in south africa,and in the practise matches as well so i think he will be in good touch soon
Re: Re: Re: EVEN KUMBLE WOULD HAVE BOWLED BETTER
by Mr Bean on Mar 07, 2011 11:30 AM
foolish person is a lil harsh word! :) everyone has their own opinion..
Re: Re: Re: Re: EVEN KUMBLE WOULD HAVE BOWLED BETTER
by shobha on Mar 07, 2011 11:42 AM
Dear KARVA SACH, You need learn a bit how to behave in public and in private
Re: I LOVE YUVI AND BHAJII
by shobha on Mar 07, 2011 11:13 AM
HELLOOO, HE IS A PAPER TIGER, IN FRONT OF KENYA, IRELAND,BANGLA. DO NOT TRUST, WHEN INTO CLAIMAX STAGE THEY FAIL. REVITAL IS ALWAYS 24HRS HE REQUIRES. PL DO NOT TRUST. ALL FAKE TEMPORARY....
Re: I LOVE YUVI AND BHAJII
by Rajesh Gupta on Mar 07, 2011 11:22 AM
THEY R SO DETERMINATIVE AND ALWAYS READY FOR DO AND DIE - for who? definately not for country..
