we have to balme BCCI they should have either fully rejected or fully accepted the revie system Had they fully rejected Paterson might got out in 70s in Lords test do not blame praveen pl blame BCCI NOE THEY SHOULD CPMPENSTATE THE FINE
Re: Praveenkumar fined
by ninad avasare on Jul 30, 2011 03:53 PM
They let off Stuart Broad and Jim Anderson. Jim Anderson threw ball directly on Gautam Gambhir while he was batting in first test first inn.
Re: Praveenkumar fined
by A Singh on Jul 30, 2011 05:48 PM
If the Indians want to minimise the chances of being penalised, they would better agree to UDRS. A review could have settled the matter on the spot.
Young Praveen must control himself.One can always have chat with umpires about decisions but with civility w/o showing wrong emotions.Youngsters like Praveen should try to learn from seniors like Sachin,Dravid,laxaman etc and emulate them on the field behaviour.It will go a long way in building their career.In fact it was a correct decision because the batter did deserve the benefit of doubt consideribg the height.PK was wrong in the way he reacted against the umpire.
last time as well, Peitersen cheated to score double century by turning a LBW into a catch situation by snicking the ball by the pads and show a bat hit action at the same time. bowden turned LBW into a pad snick that is not out. And cheating was done using DRS. thus, DRS will eventually favour those who made it whether it is automated or manual. Favours are given to tendulkar to soften him to support DRS. awards given to Dhoni to soften him as well so indian dont walk out of this series.
Re: Praveen LBW decision not given out.
by D S on Jul 30, 2011 10:08 AM
Decision given in favor of india was too late when fate of match was known. All done to rein in India. And those decision were very strategic to favor angrez to have an moral upperhand.
Re: Re: Praveen LBW decision not given out.
by D S on Jul 30, 2011 10:10 AM
Re: Day 01 analysis.
India did not have the T20 field and bowling for broad and swann.
for T20, the wicket-keeper stand close to wicket, bowling is on one side of the stumps and fielding is placed accordingly for catch, bold, stumps or run out.
we missed out on T20 bowling and fielding when swann and broad were playing t20. Last time Prior was playing T20 as well with broad.
Neverthless, Prior was canned this time though guys were unlucky with Broad. congrats for getting the top order.
Does it not sound bitter that the Britishers even today could not tolerate DISSIDENTS & Arguments based on the TRUTH & FACTS ? The viewers on TV and the Commentators & the Spectators on the field saw it Peterson of England , was LBW.Displays/Coverage of the MOMENTS confirmed that Peterson was LBW but the Umpire- Erasmus , did not accept the TRUTH but against the Fact allowed Peterson to continue Battings.However Praveen Fined for arguments does not sound GOOD.It was against the SPORT spirit and too much for India and Indians.I condemn the decision of Erasmus & ICC.
Re: Praveen Fined.
by madhan kumar on Jul 30, 2011 10:00 AM
Plz shut, since last match 2nd innings Eng got two good opportunity, but umpire said no, where you gone that time, S Broad was upset but went silent... Why we are not matured enough like that...
To avoid all those issues only, every country need Review system which only Indians opposed... Understand, now ICC is nothing but BCCI, BCCI is commending ICC nowdays.
Re: Re: Praveen Fined.
by D S on Jul 30, 2011 10:07 AM
Praveen LBW decision not given out.
Decision given in favor of india was too late when fate of match was known. All done to rein in India.
last time as well, Peitersen cheated to score double century by turning a LBW into a catch situation by snicking the ball by the pads and show a bat hit action at the same time. bowden turned LBW into a pad snick that is not out. And cheating was done using DRS. thus, DRS will eventually favour those who made it whether it is automated or manual. Favours are given to tendulkar to soften him to support DRS. awards given to Dhoni to soften him as well so indian dont walk out of this series.
