Re: Re: Rajesh Gupta,
by LG on Feb 26, 2011 01:53 PM
Yes, speed is not everything. Speed to pace bowler is like money is to common man,one should have it though it can not get you everything.
Re: Re: Re: Rajesh Gupta
by Rajesh Gupta on Feb 26, 2011 01:29 PM
OK Now tell who can be a better biowling option Sree or Munaf to share new ball with Zaheer in WC
Re: Re: Re: Re: Rajesh Gupta
by LG on Feb 26, 2011 01:35 PM
Yadav, the quickest Indian bowler at the moment. He will add variety ( raw pace) to attack, if used intelligently.
Re: Re: Rajesh Gupta
by sonu on Feb 26, 2011 01:35 PM
u r right rajesh, sreesant is a useless bowler so is nehra. all those who think that sreesant is a gud bowler shud check his stats (its absolutely free). eco more thn 6 n average is more thn 35. he along wid nehra wl create problems for our team.
Re: Re: Re: Rajesh Gupta
by Rajesh Gupta on Feb 26, 2011 01:52 PM
You are correct Sonu! But some regional people don't think they are Indian first, then states...
Re: Rajesh Gupta
by Rajesh Gupta on Feb 26, 2011 01:16 PM
Are you O.K. I think something is missing at your top or it may be shifted in your knee... What is the meaning of your comments? Everybody knows that cricket is a team bowler and excellent players make it excellent team... Whats new in it... In fact, if there is any greatest player with couple of good players in any team, it can be beat any team of excellent players on any day...
Now, I am sure your foolish mind will understand some logis...
Sreesant never be a better bowler than Munaf.. Infact a big surprise for inclusion of Sree for the WC.. He might be a better bowler in test cricket, but not for oneday format, as because he can't bowl even 3-4 good balls in single over. He is just waste bowler, only body agression nothing else..
I don't think he will get a chance in remaining matches, other than any injury...
Re: Sreesant - should be replaced?
by sonu on Feb 26, 2011 01:33 PM
u r right rjesh, sreesant is a useless bowler so is nehra. all those who think that sreesant is a gud bowler shud check his stats (its absolutely free). eco more thn 6 n average is more thn 35. he along wid nehra wl create problems for our team.
Re: Sreesant
by Rajesh Gupta on Feb 26, 2011 12:54 PM
Sreesant never be a better bowler than Munaf.. Infact a big surprise for inclusion of Sree for the WC.. He might be a better bowler in test cricket, but not for oneday format, as because he can't bowl even 3-4 good balls in single over. He is just waste bowler, only body agression nothing else..
I don't think he will get a chance in remaining matches, other than any injury...
is the most balanced team in this WC, hence the strongest contender for winning the WC. But if they meet Aussi in the final then they will have tough time, Aussies are the most professional cricketers and everyone who wear green cap has never-give-up attitude.
Re: Re: SA
by LG on Feb 26, 2011 01:09 PM
Commonsense says as team is good because of its excellent players ( not because of just one player even if he is the greatest)....what is your point? Do not show your foolishness so openly.
Re: Re: PJ
by shammi khandelwal on Feb 26, 2011 12:24 PM
tait is very effective in short burst he may be expensive,he may not bowl 10 ovs but he can change the match very quickly
