Re: Re: R.P.SINGH IS BETTER
by anand lakshman on Dec 17, 2011 03:52 PM
Agarkar did take 6 wickets once upon a time though but his batting skills in australia is a treat to watch,5 ducks !!!
Re: R.P.SINGH IS BETTER
by prashant kannambra on Dec 17, 2011 03:44 PM
ISHANT WILL DO VERY WELL UNDER A POSTITUTE...POSITIVE ATTITUDE(POSTITUTE)..THAN A SUBSTITUTE WHT SAYS PEOPLE!!
Re: R.P.SINGH IS BETTER
by Panaz Hussain on Dec 17, 2011 04:07 PM
Munaf Patel can also be tried. He is a superb swing bowler who can destabilise the Aussies
Pankaj Singh is doing some good work in Ranaji. He deservers a break in Test Team for all the hard work of yester years and this year. P.s. : Ashok Dinda is bowling good too.
Re: India should opt for 4 fast bowlers.
by bigben bigben on Dec 17, 2011 02:05 PM
Irfan pathan top bowling speed is 120kmph. Even Anil Kumble was faster.
Success got to his head and eating too much fatty food gave him a big behind which makes it difficult to run fast and bowl. Wasted talent. Now he is only fit for bowling 4 overs in T20 games.
Re: Re: India should opt for 4 fast bowlers.
by Varun on Dec 17, 2011 02:15 PM
Irfans top bowling speed is around 130. You probably need better glasses. He can swing the ball quite well and can be far more effective than the fast bowlers. Fast bowling myths you hold dear is causing the confusion. Variations are needed as well. Australians grew up playing fast bowling. What novelty is in 140mph for them ?
Re: Re: Re: India should opt for 4 fast bowlers.
by Injun Abhi on Dec 17, 2011 02:19 PM
Varun, your logic is completely flawed. Paki fast bowlers make the Aussies jump around all the time. So yes, pace is important to bowl in Australia series. Venkatesh Prasad/Irfan Pathan type bolwers will be hit all over the park.
Re: Re: Re: Re: India should opt for 4 fast bowlers.
by Mumbai Indian on Dec 17, 2011 02:32 PM
yes injul you may be right but still Irfan is 1o times better than vinay kumar and mithun. it was greg chappel who made him lose hisstrength by diverting his focus to batting
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: India should opt for 4 fast bowlers.
by prashant kannambra on Dec 17, 2011 03:46 PM
ISHANT WILL DO VERY WELL UNDER A POSTITUTE...POSITIVE ATTITUDE(POSTITUTE)..THAN A SUBSTITUTE WHT SAYS PEOPLE!!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: India should opt for 4 fast bowlers.
by salim siddiqui on Dec 17, 2011 03:59 PM
I think more than Irfan ,we should go for some pace,maybe Goni or Dinda from IPL will stand gud if given a chance...wat say guys???
Sad same story continues...varun aron sud be send in immediately as a replacement for Ishant...team management sudnt compromise wid n injured player!!!!!!!!
Re: Re: Irfan Pathan
by bigben bigben on Dec 17, 2011 02:03 PM
joginder sharma suffered serious injuries in a car crash near Delhi barely 3 weeks ago. He might still be in hospital. How can he go? Hate to say, but might have to pick the immature Sreesanth. He is a good bowler, if only he could grow up and be more mature than a 11 year old.
Re: Re: Re: Irfan Pathan
by king kong on Dec 17, 2011 02:31 PM
Since Sreesanth's ego does not tolerate being "dropped" he had announced an "injury." Now we might see him announce that he's be cured by a miracle.
