Re: just a ques 2 all of u .....
by taklu on Apr 03, 2011 01:26 AM
you do have the point, in fact hockey achieved much more for India in a far bigger scenario than cricket has done. Indian hockey won many fans across the globe due to the political scneraio and also the world back then which considered non-whites as non - performers. So if anybody
Re: just a ques 2 all of u .....
by bango tango on Apr 03, 2011 01:24 AM
can u plz let me know that wtz the National Game of India ??? I guess it's cricket , am I correct :-) ....
also let me know y no one is demanding Posthumous Bharat Ratna 4 Major Dhyan Chand ???? what was his crime or fault or lesser achievement ????
some indians are posting msg that will offend all of us...it was ok had they been porkies..but indians posting such msg shows their sick mentality...atleast today let this board be kept clean
Re: Bharat ratna for Sachin
by santosh pathak on Apr 03, 2011 01:20 AM
atleast government should understand public feeling and honor him with the highest civilian award
Re: But where is Poonam Pandey ??
by chindhee chor on Apr 03, 2011 01:18 AM
better watch some good quality porn rather than watching this ugly girl from delhi
Re: Re: But where is Poonam Pandey ??
by Amit on Apr 03, 2011 01:29 AM
Ugly or not she should keep her promise? I want to see someone living upto her words.
In corporates companies decide to give contracts to their business partners, but still call for 'Request for Proposals'. No foul play or no corruption, the company's CEO or some CxO simply decides to give the contract to selected business partner. This is called business arrangement and is perfectly legal but unethical. For example, World Bank, IMF are slammed for their bias towards US because US is their largest shareholder, and in fact is US President decides the head of world bank. UNO itself has approved inhuman wars of Iraq and others, because the security council is managed by US, France and UK leaving China and Russia. No one can prove this to be corruption, it is only termed as political arrangement.
How is this related to cricket? ICC is the regulator of international cricket and BCCI - the Indian Cricket Board is the richest cricket board across world, so unless India wins the cup - ICC cannot survive. In 2007, India has exited prematurely so ICC wasn't able to rake up the projected revenues. This time ICC is careful for India to win.
Before the semi-final match itself ICC chief Haroon Lorgat said it will be a "fairy tale ending for Sachin". how can he say even before semi-finals, unless 'special arrangements' are made for India to win? Simple business sense to make India win, no fixing but only arrangement. No wonder Sharad Pawar gave 400 million rupees of tax benefit to ICC. Good arrangement but truth is it is fixing.
Re: poonam pandey
by krishnamohan bajjuri on Apr 03, 2011 12:56 AM
Congratulation to India team, particularly sachin, I really enjoy at this moment, i was waiting this moment sice 1996, got it now..........
