Re: Re: Re: AUSTRALIA WILL NO DOUBT MAUL INDIA IN 2ND TEST
by cricketfan on Oct 08, 2010 10:35 PM
But,of late, India has been beating Australia frequently and with confidence.
Re: Re: AUSTRALIA WILL NO DOUBT MAUL INDIA IN 2ND TEST
by BAR WAITRESS on Oct 08, 2010 10:23 PM
always india will not be let to win wihtout any cost by western cultured ICC
Re: Re: Re: So what's your call
by Sports Lover on Oct 08, 2010 10:23 PM
In India no team wins the toss in a test and bowls. I don't remember when it happened last time.
Re: So what's your call
by Sports Lover on Oct 08, 2010 10:25 PM
actually I thought you said win the toss and bat. I don't think team winning the toss will bowl.
Re: Re: So what's your call
by cricketfan on Oct 08, 2010 10:18 PM
That's good there has to be some opposite views,or else, no fun.Will see morning.As said earlier,no problem for India in facing Aussie spinners on day 5.
Re: Today I posted a message here through my phone
by Senthil on Oct 08, 2010 10:12 PM
yeah, It depends. Kiran also used to post a lot from Mobile but I never seen his E Mail ID displayed.
Re: Re: Today I posted a message here through my phone
by Sports Lover on Oct 08, 2010 10:21 PM
It is really hard form me to post using mobile. Don't think I'll try again :-)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Today I posted a message here through my phone
by Sports Lover on Oct 08, 2010 10:26 PM
yeah just bought a touch phone and was testing wifi etc. and didn't find it fun :-)
Re: Re: CWG Tennis - Bhupati and Peas out
by Senthil on Oct 08, 2010 10:05 PM
There is a sure bronze since they are going to meet another Indian pair Rohan/Bopanna
Re: CWG Tennis - Bhupati and Peas out
by Sunil Vaidya on Oct 09, 2010 01:40 AM
hi sports lover, are you going to bother to reply to my post? you said you would do that after the 5th days play?
He plays well only in domestic matches or club level T20 matches. Look at how he played against India Blue when playing for India Red. Scored 30 ball 63 with 5 fours and 5 sixes.
Re: Yusuf Pathan
by Sunil Vaidya on Oct 09, 2010 01:42 AM
hi sports lover, are you going to bother to reply to my post? you said you would do that after the 5th days play?
Re: Yusuf Pathan
by cricketfan on Oct 08, 2010 10:01 PM
I think he is fit for T20. Should open with Sehwag.. Gambhir should be only for tests and ODIs. Imagine,Sehwag and Y.Patahn click, jisko,laga,dala,to,life, jinga,lala..
Can somebody tell Ponting that it is the umpires who decided on whether a player requires a sub runner or not? Even with a pre-existing injury, the player can claim a hamstring pull and request for a runner...
Re: It is the umpires, Stupid!
by Sports Lover on Oct 08, 2010 09:41 PM
I am not sure but think opposition team captain has to agree as well. Because I have seen captains deny a batsman a runner.
Re: Re: It is the umpires, Stupid!
by cricketfan on Oct 08, 2010 10:04 PM
Yes,opposition captain has to agree. We can play somebody carrying an injury and hope he will bat with runner..if that's the case the rule will be misused.
Re: Re: It is the umpires, Stupid!
by Senthil on Oct 08, 2010 09:51 PM
I thing only in the case of the umpires not sure and ask the Opposition Captain but the Umpires call is the Final as per rule.
It's like the umpires ask the Opposition captain that as per rule he is not avail a runner but sportingly u are willing to give a runner.
Re: Re: Re: It is the umpires, Stupid!
by Sports Lover on Oct 08, 2010 10:17 PM
Yes rules say that opposition captain has NO say and it is only umpires who decide it.
But read this:
England's ultimately comfortable passage to the semi-finals of the ICC Champions Trophy was marred by a moment of controversy towards the end of the night at Centurion, when Andrew Strauss refused Graeme Smith a runner. Smith, who batted 216 minutes in all after having spent a session in the field, was clearly unhappy when AB de Villiers was asked to head back to the pavilion, and Mickey Arthur, the South African coach, was seen swearing in frustration. Smith was dismissed soon after for 141, and South Africa eventually fell 12 runs short of the 313 that would have given them a mathematical chance of survival in the competition.
Re: Re: Re: Re: It is the umpires, Stupid!
by Senthil on Oct 08, 2010 10:28 PM
Sporty, It was not exactly happened. It was the umpire who decided not to give a Runner and A Strauss is Agreed with umpires. That was later on clearly explained by Strauss.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: It is the umpires, Stupid!
by Sports Lover on Oct 08, 2010 10:34 PM
More info:
"I didn't feel he merited having a runner at that stage," said Strauss. My personal view is you shouldn't get a runner for cramps full stop."
"He asked me for a runner because he was cramping, the umpires were not particularly keen to give him one, and I felt at the end of a long game when you have had a long innings you are going to be tired," added Strauss. "That is one of the things that happens and cramping to a certain extent is a preparation thing and to a certain extent a conditioning thing."
Re: Re: It is the umpires, Stupid!
by Sunil Vaidya on Oct 09, 2010 01:45 AM
hi sports lover, are you going to bother to reply to my post? you said you would do that after the 5th days play?
Re: CWG
by Sunil Vaidya on Oct 09, 2010 02:20 AM
hi sports lover, are you going to bother to reply to my post? you said you would do that after the 5th days play?
Re: Re: Re: SACHIN WILL CLICK...IF YEDURAPPA GOVT FALLS
by Sunil Vaidya on Oct 09, 2010 02:21 AM
hi sports lover, are you going to bother to reply to my post? you said you would do that after the 5th days play?
