Re: Redifff................!!
by sehil on Jan 07, 2010 12:34 PM
actually he is yusuf youhana but its not ur mistake as hashim looks a twin brother of yusuf.
Today is India & Bagalsesh Match in which India should not take the bangla Lightly otherwise the motivation of the player will go down..... All the best to the team India.....
Beside if we there in place of Pakistan against Australia we definitely win that match.... with a good margin... It is their (Pak) badluck that they miss the Golden Opportunity....... I predict that the 3rd test also loose Pakistan with an Inning..... because of their previous define in the match beacause we had already played
He changed his religion to get the captainship of Pakistan and he was not able to live up to it. Little knowing that God is one and we are all his children
The match is fixed. PCB has no money. They can get money only by losing a winnin match. Even the poorest team in cricet an get the score of 176. Pakistan has good batsmen, but it failed toget the score 176. On the other had Australians can do anything for not getting defeated. They are good "PAY MASTER".
Re: Pakistan's defeat against Australia
by target on Jan 07, 2010 12:17 PM
so if pakistan lose match is fixed and when pakistan win they are world champion .good logic mr kamesh idiot they are playing against great aussies who can bend there tail anytime and anywhere .
Re: Re: Pakistan's defeat against Australia
by Kamesh Krishnamoorthy on Jan 07, 2010 12:45 PM
ONLY AN IDIOT CALLS OTHER AS IDIOT. Whole world knows that that the match is fixed. Aussies are not great. They are becoming great by paying
Re: Pakistan's defeat against Australia
by Mohan Krishnan on Jan 07, 2010 12:42 PM
Also possible that they lost to see that India are knocked of the pedestal in the Test rankings.
Re: Pakistan's defeat against Australia
by Against Pseudos on Jan 07, 2010 12:44 PM
KK:
Hmmmm... . by the same logic even India had fixed the Sydney 2008 test match?
It was a clear draw for even the poorest team in cricket. 7 down and 3 overs to go.
But we managed to lose three.... a full THREE wickets to a rank part time spinner Michael Clarke...
So thanks for telling us that Australians paid us to win Sydney test and then we paid THEM to win the home series ... :)
Great.. You are a TRUE cricketer.
By the way, Hauritz's catching that "blinder" off Yousuf, or Haddin almost flying to catch Butt which would have been a certain 4 with our "Aur Bolo" wicket keeper were mere side shows which played no role whatsoever in a win which Australians enjoyed with a laid back attitude sipping beer on a sofa? :)
Boss, tell you what.. If India was defending 176, and had got those chances, we would have still lost.... and "Aur Bolo" would have blamed the DEW factor.... :) Or the Umpires,... or the DRS... or that Kid wearing a blue cap sitting in the 7th row from back who shouldn't have been there....or the classic "spirit of the game" card... But trust me, he would have found out SOME very "intelligent" analysis..... :)
In his absence, we must make do with your Analysis of course.... :)
Re: Pakistan's defeat against Australia
by target on Jan 07, 2010 12:17 PM
so if pakistan lose match is fixed and when pakistan win they are world champion .good logic mr kamesh idiot they are playing against great aussies who can bend there tail anytime and anywhere .
