its all about perception....thats y australia and england wants security review. Look at indias perception on a global stage....how about our reputation in the winter olympics.....its shame...
we can go as far as high as we can...but we will be perceived by our weakest link...
truth is india is a third world country and thats y australia and england can snub IPL...same situation in australia and england...they say Business as usual....no report....
guess what australia and new zealand are on stand by to host 2011 world cup....
Dinesh karthik can be replaced since he is not the future on india. He got upteen no of chances and his average is still less than 30 only and he has scored very less. Repalce Dinesh Karthik with Irfan Pathan and play both Pathan Brothers. Give them some opportunities and I believe they can perform better. Also Manish Pandey can be considered and he can replace Ashwin. Don;t understand how Ashwin got selected to indian team even though he is not part of South Zone team.
we WON in bangladesh with and without dhogi and political antics...so regular and longer rotations of all departments including wicket-keeping are overdue
THEY CAN GET AS MANY-MANY NEW BOWLERS, MANY NEW batsmen....
UNTIL THERE IS FAIRness in rotating wicket-keeper,
THE MORALEE OF THE TEAM WILL REMAIN LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW
Re: Re: Re:for all HYPOCRITESS>fairness in ROTATION of wk, bat
by E darwin on Feb 23, 2010 04:35 AM
start this rotation for all. You will uncover lot more barriers...
Need to try Irfan Pathan,since he is the perfect all-rounder our country has today.He has to be tried more so that he will become consistent.Else he will be always under pressure to put-in maximum.
Need to try Irfan Pathan,since he is the perfect all-rounder our country has today.He has to be tried more so that he will become consistent.Else he will be always under pressure to put-in maximum.
Need to try Irfan Pathan,since he is the perfect all-rounder our country has today.He has to be tried more so that he will become consistent.Else he will be always under pressure to put-in maximum.
He has lots of variety in bowling compared to ishant,nehra,praveen kumar...but the problem with him is that he always tries to experiment new things in crucial overs ( odi & 20-20) ,which is creating problems to him.i hope eric simmons& m.s dhoni talks to him about it seriously..
Re: sreesanth
by pyare mohan on Feb 23, 2010 01:49 AM
sreesanth is useless bowler..better he is k1cked out of team..bhajji didi good job by slapping him..
well i think it would be a better idea to include one more bowler in team. If six batsman can not save match and one more batsman will also can not. But a bowler can be helpfull in these pitches because it gives captain a option if your one bowler has an off day. It also add to varriation in atteck. We have good batsman till six and than pravin kumar is also ok. Ravindra jadeja is also good. And even nehra is able to hit one or two. i think we can give a try to one more bowler. what your opinion pple.
Re: WHY NOT TO TAKE ONE MORE BOWLER AT PLACE OF DINESH KARTIK
by gaurav manchanda on Feb 23, 2010 12:19 AM
india always play with 4 front-line bowlers & in each and every match, two of these 4 front-line bowlers have an off-day.
thanks to yuvraj, he used to bowl 8 or 9 overs in every match with an economy rate of around 5
Re: WHY NOT TO TAKE ONE MORE BOWLER AT PLACE OF DINESH KARTIK
by rocky on Feb 23, 2010 08:20 AM
if 6 batsmen cannot save amatch then one more batsmen also cannot. Do not u think the same applies to bowling also, if ur 4 best bowlers cannot take wickets#restrict the opposition then an additional bowler also cannot do much. Here u r talking abt nehra, Praveen as batsmen. That way we have, Sehwag, Yuvraj, Raina, Tendulkar who are part timers but at times bowl better than the main bowlers.
Re: WHY NOT TO TAKE ONE MORE BOWLER AT PLACE OF DINESH KARTIK
by gaurav manchanda on Feb 23, 2010 12:15 AM
ashwin shud be included into the squad. HE IS ONE OF INDIA's BEST DOMESTIC ALL-ROUNDERs.
