Raina does not have the skill to tackle vicious bouncers. SA will easily get Raina out if Raina plays. Mohd Kaif would have been the ideal replacement for injured Dravid.
The No. 1 ranking, should they win or draw, will be a bonus. Between that and now stands a hurt Indian side that will give it its all to protect that proud record at home
Nothing calms the Indian dressing room like VVS Laxman does. No one handles crisis like Laxman does. India are in right trouble, and Laxman usually delivers at such times.
He should be in the final 11 whatever the matter because he Left Hander, he can tackle SA Left Arm Spinner Horris. Even he can bowl whenever required. As a fileder, he No.1 in India. He should have given preference ahead of Yuvraj because he can bat nicely against Fast as well as Spinner, Yuvraj cann't bat against spinners (Yuvraj don't have paitence).
Re: Wriddhiman Saha should be taken only as WK,not batting
by deepak on Feb 13, 2010 06:39 PM
Saha did pretty good, when all the big guns failed. Saha was a good choice after all.
Re: Re: Wriddhiman Saha should be taken only as WK,not batting
by E darwin on Feb 13, 2010 06:47 PM
but you know why they rushed him out and got karthik, the deal player back in. The deal between dhoogi and srikant to screw india slowly.
Re: Re: Wriddhiman Saha should be taken only as WK,not batting
by SUBROTO RAY on Feb 13, 2010 06:49 PM
My choice would be Dinesh Kartik over saha if you would have to have a second wicket keeper who can bat.Whats the experience of this saha?
Re: Re: Re: Wriddhiman Saha should be taken only as WK,not battin
by E darwin on Feb 13, 2010 08:23 PM
karthik is now a toy to do a flip flop play for dhogi to stay...
he is losing his lusture like many players due to this nexxus politics.
Re: Re: Wriddhiman Saha should be taken only as WK,not batting
by India on Feb 13, 2010 07:57 PM
I think he means Dhoni when he says Dhoogi. I have no idea what Dhoogi means. Sometimes reading these comments gives me a good laugh. It is really funny.
