Re: Wriddhiman Saha should be taken only as WK,not batting
by deepak on Feb 13, 2010 06:39 PM
Saha did pretty good, when all the big guns failed. Saha was a good choice after all.
Re: Re: Wriddhiman Saha should be taken only as WK,not batting
by E darwin on Feb 13, 2010 06:47 PM
but you know why they rushed him out and got karthik, the deal player back in. The deal between dhoogi and srikant to screw india slowly.
Re: Re: Wriddhiman Saha should be taken only as WK,not batting
by SUBROTO RAY on Feb 13, 2010 06:49 PM
My choice would be Dinesh Kartik over saha if you would have to have a second wicket keeper who can bat.Whats the experience of this saha?
Re: Re: Re: Wriddhiman Saha should be taken only as WK,not battin
by E darwin on Feb 13, 2010 08:23 PM
karthik is now a toy to do a flip flop play for dhogi to stay...
he is losing his lusture like many players due to this nexxus politics.
Re: Re: Wriddhiman Saha should be taken only as WK,not batting
by India on Feb 13, 2010 07:57 PM
I think he means Dhoni when he says Dhoogi. I have no idea what Dhoogi means. Sometimes reading these comments gives me a good laugh. It is really funny.
Suresh Raina and Dinesh Karthik (in Tests as well) have proven records. Ahead of them, Wriddhiman Saha has played in Nagpur Test. Nobody knows, when Lady Luck knock your door!
