Re: INSTEAD ON HIS CENTURY - HE SHOULD THINK OF 100 HAIRS ON HIS
by gunjan khandelwal on Aug 18, 2010 05:47 PM
what an stupid comment! Write smthing meaningful or else keep quite
Re: INSTEAD ON HIS CENTURY - HE SHOULD THINK OF 100 HAIRS ON HIS
by gunjan khandelwal on Aug 18, 2010 05:47 PM
what an stupid comment! Write smthing meaningful or else keep quite
Its the same sehwag who kicked at the ball to make it a boundary so that the better batsman does not come on the crease. This happened only last season.
Re: dont forget
by mayur palav on Aug 18, 2010 05:51 PM
Yea Man ,,,I remember now..I think Shewag forgot the incident. Just want to add one point here ..Cricketers talk to press that they dont care about the records on paper, but with such incident it appears they care a lot for milestones
Re: Re: dont forget
by Sameer on Aug 19, 2010 08:15 AM
just a quick question ... if you are not behind milestones, you will end up nowhere.
Even in corporate world, if you do not want to grow into upper management , while contributing to the company, you will be outdated.
There is absolutely nothing wrong in pursuing individual records. Thats what keeps the hunger alive in you.
But then again, thats just me. You people clearly haven't played any sport at any level and at best will remain in the entry level position in every organisation you work in
Re: dont forget
by shib roy on Aug 18, 2010 05:38 PM
That was for team's good and in purpose to win the game. It was not an already-lost situation like SL.
Re: dont forget
by Guruprasad N on Aug 18, 2010 05:40 PM
That was to win a match. So that is for the team. Here they did not win by making this. Don't show your follishness by posting such comments.
Re: Re: dont forget
by classical guy on Aug 18, 2010 05:47 PM
Where is foolishness? Ok they don't have the sportsmanship. they have perfectly legaglly bowled a noball. SO What? Just make sure we don't get out like phone number scores the next time..
Re: Re: Re: dont forget
by Varun on Aug 18, 2010 06:45 PM
So nothing. But cant sehwag talk about it and taunt the srilankans. It is a mind game after all. Keep them preoccupied with this news.
Re: Re: dont forget
by rohit chauhan on Aug 18, 2010 08:14 PM
Dont know why so many guys start giving personal comments rather than discussing things on rediff. The point is, Sehwag has himself done illegal as well as immoral things on the field. Its ok to lament missing his century, but to keep on harping as if u r the only yudhishthir in the world... annoying. @bigbug: I am an Indian with a conscience.
Apologies are mere words and hardly does justice for the wrong done to Sehwag. For that matter to Sachin and Saurav as well. These kinds of extremely cheap behavior has no place in Cricket. There has to be a more substantive fallout like a 5-match ban for Randiv. In fact, punishment to Dilshan for proposing the idea and to Sangakkara who supported it as captain are also due. If ICC does not do this, IPL franchises should not offer contracts to these three cheapos.
Re: Mere apology wont do, Randiv needs to be punished
by classical guy on Aug 18, 2010 05:50 PM
folks, tell me onething (I am indian of course). Whats wrong in bowling a no ball? its perfectly legal. second... ppl don't think of how to win a game (not the last one) but in general. Only if a century is missed, they do all this. Where are the same set of players when the game is lost?
Re: Re: Mere apology wont do, Randiv needs to be punished
by Sameer on Aug 19, 2010 08:17 AM
bowling a noball just to deny someone of an achievement , and bowling it when the match result has been fixed is what is wrong and petty
Re: Mere apology wont do, Randiv needs to be punished
by Anupam Bhardwaj on Aug 18, 2010 05:40 PM
Exactly....if no action is taken, these players should be thrown out of the IPL....
Let us get on with cricket , yes the Lankans have apologied to Sehwag , I think let us play good cricket and get the cup and not get bogged down with these matters as the ICC and Lankan Board should be able to tackle this problem .
There were incidents of deliberate throw, sledging, ball tampering , time wasting if the team insight of win ( Newzealand vs India under John Reid involving Speedstror Taylor) bodyline attack etc. The incident should not to be streched further. Suraj and Sanga and Lankan criket autorites have oppologed. Sewag also accepted.Based on the above Indian cricket Officials also closed incident. Hyoithetically the bowler would have got bowled Sewag . If considered necessary rules may be made to avoid deliberate actions if proved. It is good to know Mr.Cool had not over reacted.
Lankans had NOTHING to lose by bowling a legitimate ball to Sehwag. The match was lost already and a single to Sehwag would at least have given him a brilliantly compiled and most well-deserved century. In spite of that, Dilshan who played under Sehwag for three IPL seasons, had the cheapness to ask Randiv to bowl a no-ball JUST to deny that century. Lankans did the same to Sachin when Malinga bowled a wide boundary to deny him a century. Saurav Ganguly met the same fate against the same cheap combination and was left stranded on 98. We are talking about a complete absence of magnanimity and amazing cheapness in these acts. Even though they had NOTHING to lose, they still ensured that they DENY something for Saurav, Sachin, and Sehwag. Since this has been repeated, it is easy to decipher the Lankan psyche which is imbued with treachery, cheapness, and cruelty.
Re: Re: Cheap Mindedness is the key issue
by Guruprasad N on Aug 18, 2010 05:44 PM
One more dumbo "Shakti Kapoor" who doesn't understand "what is to win a game" and what is to do something for sadist pleasure to deny something to some-one.
Re: Re: Re: Cheap Mindedness is the key issue
by classical guy on Aug 18, 2010 05:53 PM
That was immaterial.. whether to win a game or not. What sehwag did is wrong morally. If the batsman at the other end of the wicket had faced the ball, that would have turned favourable to them. Only thing is, Randiv, didn't want to give a century to sehwag and the other is sehwag didn't want the good batsman to face.. simple
