Re: its fair in a war
by gourav jain on Aug 18, 2010 05:57 PM
Fair enough, its fair to not allow someone to make century against you. But the question here is bowling an No-Ball deliberately is against the spirit of the game.
Re: Re: Re: its fair in a war
by Sandeep Malhotra on Aug 18, 2010 06:02 PM
Your cricket acumen seems to be well below average or you dont know what has exactly happened.
If he wanted century , why did he wasted first 2 balls??? If Randiv delibrately wanted to avoid century of sehwag , why didnt he bowled wide /no ball in first 2 balls.
Sehwag didnt get century so he is crying. Sour grapes
Re: Sour grapes for sehwag.
by guy giggling on Aug 18, 2010 06:02 PM
Man if one could score on every delivery, every match would produce 400 runs for each side
Re: Looser sehwag
by amitabh ambastha on Aug 18, 2010 05:54 PM
when 15 overs are left leaving two balls cannot be construed as a waste and that too when a batsman has single handedly taken the match in India's favour.
Re: Looser sehwag
by suman mukherjee on Aug 18, 2010 05:51 PM
I don't think you are an Indian. No one Indian can reply this way. Indian has won the match on that day because of Sehwag's innings only. You must be a Srilankan and must be very upset with the humiliating defeat.
Re: Re: Looser sehwag
by Raichand on Aug 18, 2010 07:03 PM
He is an practical Indian not like you emotional fools. We won the match and that was the most important thing for us if we are Indians.
