Re: Sehwag is Culprit..
by apoorva vora on Aug 18, 2010 04:31 PM
In fact Sehwag precipitated the whole issue by olaying well. Had he got out for, say, 10 or 15 runs, the no-ball wouldn't have been bowled only. Ban Sehwag for 10 matches.
Re: Sehwag is Culprit..
by siddhartha srivastava on Aug 18, 2010 04:37 PM
Are you serious? Do you know anything about cricket? Do you mean to say that Sehwag should have every ball for a six? If such be the situation he should have finished the century in 17 balls maximum and made a unbeaten world record. Have you ever held a cricket bat. I don't think so as you write `bold' instead of 'bowled'
Re: Sehwag is Culprit..
by Mahesh Tomar on Aug 18, 2010 04:30 PM
Why dont you blame Sehwag's Father instead, Why he gave birth to Sehwag, then why he sent Sehwag to Play Cricket.
Re: Re: Sehwag is Culprit..
by apoorva vora on Aug 18, 2010 04:33 PM
I fully agree with Mahesh Tomar. Ban Sehwag's father from producing any more kids for his lifetime.
Randiv has successfully dismissed veeru in last test match at 99 with same off side ball when veeru went for sixer on dancing down the track and missed it...and this time same off side ball but he succeded with sixer....but result is not got 100
Re: Randiv Veeru.
by Somali on Aug 18, 2010 04:29 PM
The no ball, if hit for a six, gives 7 runs to the team out of which 6 runs go the batsman hitting the ball. Where that 6 runs has gone. Whether bowling a no ball completes the ball. If after hitting a no ball batsman can be declared a runout. Why not hit aq successful six.
India please forget this silly issue and move ahead for the world cup preparation....don't break your head for Randiv yaar.....move on guys .....media will strecth this topic for another one week.....you should be focussed in the game.....BCCI let the guys play yaar don't create big issue of this matter......think about winning the world cup and preparation for the same
greatman thinks great.......sehwag is great player..keep it up.....low level players will do & think the low ways to win the game.....it is said in hindi....khao nahin to girado
Randiv's last over has reflected the ugly side of srilanka team, pakistan inspite of being age old rivals have never done such shamefull act. Randiv & his team has proved that they did not have courage to face shewag century... cowards.
Re: Exposed the ugly side of srilanka team
by SG on Aug 18, 2010 04:30 PM
Randiv did the right thing. Probably I would have done the same thing after sewag got 3 balls to score 1 run. India won - that only matters to me. whether someone scored a century or not thats secondary. Period!
India won the match that's important, not milestones of individuals. I feel there's nothing wrong doing so what Randiv did, if he has bowled no ball un intentionally is it wrong, like wise every thing is fair in sports, denying upper hand to opposition without physically harming a person or verbal blaming is not at all a sin
Re: Re: What's wrong
by SG on Aug 18, 2010 04:38 PM
Thats a typical Indian comment. Thats why most indians are unemployable in general. You don’t work for yourself - company pays you to work for the company. You should work hard for the Co and in turn get benefited. It a win-win situation.
Re: What's wrong
by kaladharsamy on Aug 18, 2010 04:28 PM
Please understand these things, Haven't you watched players getting out in 99? 1. being a player you are expected to play for your nation, and you are expected to win games with pride. You ( everybody in cricket) are watched by world of viewers and you become the national icon while you are capped.
2. You should always look for taking wickets or to contain the batsmen. That is your prime job. and not to think about records or bloody other things.
3. If you are a great bowler you should look for Sehwag's wicket other than his century. You should look to set fields to remove sehwag. If you show otherwise actions it means you are not fit for Gentleman's game.
The game is not about denying something to others but it is about DEFENDING YOUR SCORE EVEN WHEN A SINGLE IS NEEDED.
