Discussion Board

Sri Lanka deny Sehwag a deserved century


Total 385 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Sanjeev Suri
Much Ado About Nothing ! !
by Sanjeev Suri on Aug 18, 2010 05:06 PM  | Hide replies

Why continue making so much noise ?

The simplest SOLUTION is to have the umpire "overlook" the No Ball & allow Sehwag to be credited with the six runs that he scored.

Had i been standing in the match, i would have signalled DEAD BALL right away and warned the bowler to "BEHAVE" - signalling a DEAD BALL is very much within the umpire's jurisdiction.

Even now, with all the parties to the sorry episode being in agreement, the score-sheet can be AMENDED by the umpire's diktat and the same RATIFIED by the cricket boards of Sri Lanka and India with due sanction from ICC.

Who or What is preventing the unnecessarily vociferous Powers That Be from acting in this manner ?
Any SANE Reply ? Anyone ?


Digitally signed]
$$
Sanjeev Suri
C.E.O.
DestiNATION Excellence
Mobile : 91-9818981076
A Professional Consultancy for
Corporates Wanting to Achieve
EXCELLENCE - Worldwide !

========================================

P.S = If all are in agreement - please forward this to your friends AND send your
individual Post Cards to the BCCI - Wankhede - Mumbai

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ek ChaturNaar
Re: Much Ado About Nothing ! !
by Ek ChaturNaar on Aug 18, 2010 05:37 PM
What is the email address of BCCI?
or still better let's all prepare a signed statement and send it over.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
vinay
but ind r more obsessed with stats of batsman.
by vinay on Aug 18, 2010 07:29 AM  | Hide replies

but ind r more obsessed with stats of batsman.

had this happened to sachin missing century, there wud hv been huge hue n cry coz sachin has more backing of commentators.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sanjeev Suri
Re: but ind r more obsessed with stats of batsman.
by Sanjeev Suri on Aug 18, 2010 05:09 PM
Sachin was ALSO a victim to the same SRI LANKAN TRICK in an earlier match.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SKM Prasad
MURALI 800 but SEHWAG 99
by SKM Prasad on Aug 17, 2010 11:49 PM  | Hide replies

INDIA supported MURALI to gain 800th wicket in his last International test match. But SANGAKKARA and SURAJ RANDIV played dirty politics against INDIA's hero SEHWAG..This shows how jellous and selfish SANGAKKARA is ! He is spoiling SRILANKA's name which was lifted by great cricketers like SANATH JAYASURIYA and ARJUNA RANATUNGA

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
biju thypparampil
Cricket Spirit
by biju thypparampil on Aug 17, 2010 08:58 PM  | Hide replies

Very poor cricket from Srilankan Bowler Suraj Randiv am shame on you . We are never expect these type of sportsmansprit
Go INDIA Go we are lions


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
mohan
Randiv, SLC have apologized. Let's close this.
by mohan on Aug 17, 2010 06:44 PM

SL cricket team has won "Spirit of the Game" award two times.

The current episode has been criticized within cricket circles and in SL as well. Randiv and Sri Lankan Cricket Board have apologized personally to Viru.

Let's close this topic. Hope ICC changes its rule too.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Senthil
150
by Senthil on Aug 17, 2010 04:13 PM

up

    Forward  |  Report abuse
mama ji
who
by mama ji on Aug 17, 2010 02:44 PM

is suraj randiv

    Forward  |  Report abuse
LG
End result should be looked, not the mean
by LG on Aug 17, 2010 02:19 PM  | Hide replies

If the end result--violation of spirit of the game --is same, then there is no difference in events even if the means or act might differ, for example...

1. Randiv bowling a no ball deliberately

2. Sehwag deliberately pushing the ball for four

3. Some captains using negative tactics for stop the flow of the runs

    Forward  |  Report abuse
LG
Re: End result should be looked, not the mean
by LG on Aug 17, 2010 02:28 PM
typo: title... not the means

...to stop the flow...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Anurag Rathore
No rift between Sehwag and Dhoni........
by Anurag Rathore on Aug 17, 2010 12:48 PM

I can say it after seeing yesterday match.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
raj iyer
who
by raj iyer on Aug 17, 2010 12:48 PM  | Hide replies

reports my post?tell me his name.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Senthil
Re: who
by Senthil on Aug 17, 2010 12:55 PM
Hypocrite is the clue

   Forward   |   Report abuse
raj iyer
Re: Re: who
by raj iyer on Aug 17, 2010 12:57 PM
i dont know if you know tell me?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Senthil
Re: Re: Re: who
by Senthil on Aug 17, 2010 12:58 PM
He is hiding in the name of Special Reporter

   Forward   |   Report abuse
raj iyer
Re: Re: Re: Re: who
by raj iyer on Aug 17, 2010 12:59 PM
but who is he?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
raj iyer
Re: who
by raj iyer on Aug 17, 2010 12:56 PM
where are you hiding?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 385 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message