Re: Re: RCB XI TEAM
by deewaker pandey on May 23, 2009 05:04 PM
no 1 wll miss him as his performance speaks.in this IPL he is proving as a liability for Banglore team. In past he did well on some occasion for indian team bt here he is proven as a big zero.
Viru is completely missing McGrath in this important game of the tournament. Dirk Nannes, one of the top bowler of the tournament had received hammering from Gilchrist and Symonds. It is not a right strategy not to keep options open between both Mcgrath and Nannes.
Gilchrist, Hayden & Mcgrath are all those who have Big Match temparement than any other player in this IPL. This is a major factor and continues to be a major factor in 2nd SF & Finals Match..
Viru, you lost it due to your arrogance and strategic blunder... Better luck next time
Re: Strategic Blunder by Arrogant Viru
by LG on May 23, 2009 03:50 PM
I do agree that Viru is arrogant. But I do not agree with your point he made strategic blunder.
I do not think on this day--when Gilly got going--MacGrath four overs could have made a big difference.
He might have also gone for runs considering the fact he did not play a single game.
Re: Re: Strategic Blunder by Arrogant Viru
by saviour on May 23, 2009 03:53 PM
Well.. it is indeed... David Warner is selected instead of Daniel Vettori... He ended up scoring a duck... Vettori would have contributed with both Bat & Ball. There is no requirement of Warner in seeing the overall strength of the team.
Re: Re: Re: Strategic Blunder by Arrogant Viru
by LG on May 23, 2009 03:56 PM
Have ever taking important decision by yourself in your life or do you depend on others? Go look back what you should have done different for yourself.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Strategic Blunder by Arrogant Viru
by saviour on May 23, 2009 04:05 PM
It is clear that you are die-hard fan of Viru and indeed I am a fan of him as well... Life is also about learning from others suggestion which Sehwag ignored through out the tournament... He failed miserably in rotating his players in league matches with the top blunder being ignoring McGrath for all the matches....
I hope you also take a learning from this to your life in future...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Strategic Blunder by Arrogant Viru
by LG on May 23, 2009 04:13 PM
No my friend. I am not. You can see the list of my favorite players I put here earlier. But I want to be fair to in my analysis.
When you win 10 matches out of 14, should you change you strategy? I do not think so. You decision are based on current results in hand rather than on assumption--since MacGrath was one the best bowler in Test and ODI.
Yes, without your suggestion, I have learned not only by mistakes but also from other people's mistakes . That is why I can say confidently what I said.
Re: Complecency
by saviour on May 23, 2009 04:10 PM
Yesterday's win of DC is not just over DD and on many others.. It's pity to see and hear the one-sided praising of Delhi by commentators and support staff of Setmax... They used English in many ways to take a positive out of everything done by Delhi. Same positive speaking was missing when DC was batting.... Even the Presentation Ceremony is also polluted with this love of affection towards this North India Team...
Way to go South India.... It is all South Indian Franchisees in IPL2.
1)Hayden 2)Gilchrist 3)Y Pathan/S Raina 4)R Sharma 5)Symonds 6)D Smith/D Bravo 7)A Morkel 8)Warne(Captain) 9)Malinga 10)Murali 11)McGrath- one team in which he will play-:)
The delhi bowling was one dimensional . 3 left arm seamers.They needed mc grath in thier team . Gilchrist is particularly good with left arm seamers . One remember what he did zaheer,vaas in the world cup final matches. Sehwag was intelligent enough sense that,Even thogh naanes went for 21 of the first over he kept bowling left armers.
Re: Bad captaincy selection
by saviour on May 23, 2009 03:48 PM
Viru is completely missing McGrath in this important game of the tournament. Dirk Nannes, one of the top bowler of the tournament had received hammering from Gilchrist and Symonds. It is not a right strategy not to keep options open between both Mcgrath and Nannes.
Gilchrist, Hayden & Mcgrath are all those who have Big Match temparement than any other player in this IPL. This is a major factor and continues to be a major factor in 2nd SF & Finals Match..
Viru, you lost it due to your arrogance and strategic blunder... Better luck next time
The delhi bowling was one dimensional . 3 left arm seamers.They needed mc grath in thier team . Gilchrist is particularly good with left arm seamers . One remember what he did zaheer,vaas in the world cup final matches. Sehwag was intelligent enough sense that,Even thogh naanes went for 21 of the first over he kept bowling left armers.
Re: Bad captaincy and selection
by saviour on May 23, 2009 03:48 PM
Viru is completely missing McGrath in this important game of the tournament. Dirk Nannes, one of the top bowler of the tournament had received hammering from Gilchrist and Symonds. It is not a right strategy not to keep options open between both Mcgrath and Nannes.
Gilchrist, Hayden & Mcgrath are all those who have Big Match temparement than any other player in this IPL. This is a major factor and continues to be a major factor in 2nd SF & Finals Match..
Viru, you lost it due to your arrogance and strategic blunder... Better luck next time
There are people, although very few in numbers- whose only objective in life is to malign SRT. Such people belong to one or all of the following categories:
People who, unfortunately, were brought up around unhealthy environments that make them attention seekers (I mean they have been deprived of love and affection in their childhood. Such people always says just opposite to what is universally true or accepted by experts)
People who could not achieve whatever little they wanted to (Such people hate people who are best in what they do)
Cricketers (Including Indian national team) who suffer from inferiority complex because of Sachin (talking big in front of media does not always means that the person is confident—likewise, not all the actors and actress are confident)
People who are hired by players’ sponsors/agents to increase the values of their players by maligning Sachin (very cheap marketing stunt). What can I say; they are the poor souls, as they have to earn their livelihood by maligning others.
Re: Re: Types of People who malign Sachin Tendulkar
by LG on May 23, 2009 03:30 PM
Who cares what a unknown person like you think? What matters is what great cricketers think of Sachin. To them He is next to Don Bradman.
Re: Re: Types of People who malign Sachin Tendulkar
by Pavas Agarwal on May 23, 2009 03:23 PM
I agree with ashish kumar in this point only,Talented may be but selfish and overrated.
Re: Re: Re: Types of People who malign Sachin Tendulkar
by LG on May 23, 2009 03:36 PM
Can you give your reasons why you think he is selfish and overrated? he is the only players who has been rated next Don Bradman by his peers all over the world--not just in India.
Maybe you do not know what is meant by overrated cricketer. if you do not know just look at Dhoni--who is perfect example of most hyped and overrated cricketr--although in India only as no one rate him outside India.
Re: Cometh the hour Goneth this man
by Vortex on May 23, 2009 03:04 PM
Why you are getting so persoanl to sachin???whats your problem man..??I came to understand that your Fa..was working at his home as toilet cleaner & sachin did't pay him as your fa..is not good enough to clean his asss...
Re: Re: Cometh the hour Goneth this man
by Pavas Agarwal on May 23, 2009 03:24 PM
Where is sachin comes in all these u r a fool.Have i named anyone,why ppl are bent on taking me.
