he whole thing the politicians wanted is no ipl so big croud to their rallies. understand! see that means during election any other force can attack on india because we dont have much security personnal right !
Re: it should be on
by deba sahoo on Mar 05, 2009 07:39 PM
Yes..agreed..Security is just a concern..but now with this terrorist attack in pakistan, they have a substantially valid point to ask to postpone IPL
The Govt does not want to protect sincere sportsman, but corrupt politicans in the name of Election security. There can be no Analogies between the two. Also cancelling means conceding defeat to the fear of terrorism. IPL should go ON, meantime all the corrupt politicans who did not gain in this IPL venture can sit and think about how not to loose their seats.
Re: No Backing
by Kishor Patil on Mar 05, 2009 06:30 PM
You r bang on target! right said he whole thing the politicians wanted is no ipl so big croud to their rallies. understand! see that means during election any other force can attack on india because we dont have much security personnal right ! think the write.
Re: Re: No Backing
by Prasadh Jainapur on Mar 05, 2009 06:58 PM
Just Imagine How much security does a Common Man Have daily? NIL All those who bait against IPL are the same who cheerand jeer when INDIA won the T20. Why should we sacrifice the small amount of happiness for some Greedy Politican.
Re: Re: Re: No Backing
by jet on Mar 05, 2009 08:50 PM
do u guys think , terrorists will only attack cricketers. what if they put some bombs in the stadium .?
Re: Make IPL pay for all the security provided.
by abhinav sinha on Mar 05, 2009 06:33 PM
they pay the money for security it is only our politicians whose security are paid by taxpayers money!!
the whole thing the politicians wanted is no ipl so big croud to their rallies. understand! see that means during election any other force can attack on india because we dont have much security personnal right ! think the write.
why even talk about it now? people behind IPL are either interested in the money or glamour it offers. Cricket has lost its meaning somewhere on the way. These people are not bothered about the risks and game. the way i see it a vacation from IPL will do the game good
Re: IPL
by Kishor Patil on Mar 05, 2009 06:27 PM
he whole thing the politicians wanted is no ipl so big croud to their rallies. understand! see that means during election any other force can attack on india because we dont have much security personnal right ! think the write.
I guess the whole of IPL is a vulgar mean of showing money power. Most of the corporates who own the franchise have removed people from the rolls due to economic slow down. Some of them dont pay salaries on time. I think the IPL should be put on hold or the govt should act strong on the companies who have spend big money on cricket and cutting down on employee salary and layoffs.
I think this is not the time to conduct IPL matches in India because of recent attacks against Sri Lanka team and most of players may not play IPL matches with clear mind and there will be a flop show from foreign cricketers and we need to follow Home Minister advice seriously and if IPL bosses are arguing that if it is postponed or canceled then franchise owners and IPL need to face heavy losses then in that case Neutral venue is the best option for conducting IPL matches and this will satisfy the dream of Lalit Modi where he has plans to host IPL matches in other countries and at this point of time it is advisable not to host IPL matches in India and it s safe to held in Neutral Venues. Last time when England toured India despite Mumbai attacks because our Government have provided enough security to team in order to prove that India is a safe place for hosting cricket and this time situation is quite different and government cannot provide security which they provided for other tours and hosting major events during elections is not advisable.
Re: Re: Neutral Venue
by phaneeswar on Mar 05, 2009 06:14 PM
It is not possible for hosting IPL matches atleast for a year because if this year season is postponed or canceled then they have to host next year because Future Tour Programes dosent allow IPL to conduct matches
Re: Neutral Venue
by Sourav Ray on Mar 05, 2009 06:13 PM
IPL has to be on - we nowadays only rely upon security personnel & not the licchar politicians err. home ministry..what nonsense neutral venue are you talking about - you are an Indian or not! IPL is our showcase, a lesson to so called developed, safe & secured countries of our enoromosity & capability - govt has got more than enough reserve force to act upon whom they don't want to deploy!
Re: Re: Neutral Venue
by phaneeswar on Mar 05, 2009 06:18 PM
Iam an Indian only I'M talking possibility of neutral venue but this time Government cannot provide that much Security Forces compared to security provided when England toured when 26/11 attacks took place and its a foolish thing to put security personal to put their lives into risk just for sake of entertainment(im justified?)
Re: Neutral Venue
by Kishor Patil on Mar 05, 2009 06:25 PM
see that means during election any other force can attack on india because we dont have much security personnal right ! think the write.
Re: Neutral Venue
by abhinav sinha on Mar 05, 2009 06:38 PM
If we donot conduct the IPL then we are hopeless nation like Pakistan..nobody will ever come to the sub continent when we can successfully host Ind-Eng series just at the aftermath of 26/11 shows Indian military force is the best in the world..This is rather the perfect time to show the world that India is safe for all foreigners and investments..so we must stand together for IPL not for only cricket but for India's image.
Even the security personnels are human you cant expect them to run between the venues for securing the players and the politicians. If champions trophy could be postponed why not IPL
