1992 WC-pakistan won 1996-Srilanka won 1999-pakistan runners 2003 Wc-India runners 2007-srilanka runners 2007 T-WC-India and pak in final 2009 T-Wc-pak in final
it seems with out sub-continent teams there si no final.....
Re: x factor
by deewaker pandey on Jun 19, 2009 11:20 AM
one of the team among india,pak n srilanka r always finalist since 1992 bcoz the other strong team r SA and AUS only. england, WI and NZ were never been among strongest since last 15 yrs. So among Ind, Pak, Srilanka Aus and SA, the probabability of reaching into the finals is more for Asian team considering the fact that SA could never go ahead of semis. so among 4 strongest team- 75% chances r there for atleast 1 asian team to reach into finals.
Re: x factor
by amit singh on Jun 19, 2009 11:11 AM
there are only 8 countires who are playing serious cricket and out of those 4 are from sub-conitnent. then it has to be like that only..
Re: pakistan
by amit singh on Jun 19, 2009 11:09 AM
they were cheaters 10-15 yrs ago with javed miandad, akram, shaoib akhtar, latif, moin.... but i think now they are playing gud cricket. Also I hope they don't call shoaib akhtar. he does not fit in this team.
Re: lol whats goinggg onnnnnnnn
by rohit chopra on Jun 19, 2009 11:11 AM
hhaha Going by that principle all Pakistanis would have hanged themselves. It is just a fluke . But for u lowlives a big deal.Is your country so backward it does nt let u write ?
Re: lol whats goinggg onnnnnnnn
by Shweta on Jun 19, 2009 11:09 AM
As long as IPL stays, India will be losers. They get the money they are not bothered losing these cups
Re: Against Pseudos.....
by Against Pseudos on Jun 19, 2009 11:04 AM
Rathore:
:-)..... So you finally agreed that Dhoni was wrong in saying there is no favorite, and it was a sure sign of conceding defeat even before he began the campaign?.... :)
Re: Re: Against Pseudos.....
by ghost on Jun 19, 2009 11:07 AM
boss i m watchin that u r always opposing every body's msg....so u r the only right person in the worlddddd...
Re: Re: Against Pseudos.....
by Anurag Rathore on Jun 19, 2009 11:06 AM
Both Vettori and Ponting has proven wrong. So I said Dhoni was absolutely right who said there is no favourite in T-20.
Re: Re: Re: Against Pseudos.....
by Shweta on Jun 19, 2009 11:10 AM
As long as IPL stays, India will be losers. They get the money they are not bothered losing these cups
Re: Re: Stop criticizing India......
by Anurag Rathore on Jun 19, 2009 11:04 AM
We won CB series finals, ODI series in Srilanka without Sehwag. Indian team is not dependent on one player which they have proved in last 2 year.
Re: Re: Re: Stop criticizing India......
by Harish Iyer on Jun 19, 2009 11:06 AM
recent ODI series in lanka without sehwag ? r u joking. forgot yuvi-sehwag blasting centuries ? in CB series seheag was part of team,., it is due to dhoni's politics he was not selected.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Stop criticizing India......
by Anurag Rathore on Jun 19, 2009 11:09 AM
I am talking about previous ODI series in Srilanka. Sehwag was not in CB series finals which I mentioned.
If india is qualified to semis then the semi is between ind vs Pak.So india easily entered into the finals(according to the worldcup records which india not even lost a single match to pak).Anyway all the best to the team who is going to play against pak in final.Pak should lose in final.
Re: If india is qualified to semis
by harry madaan on Jun 19, 2009 11:10 AM
antony....dont speak in if and buts... i remember navjot sidhu quoting once that Its same like saying.... "Agar meri maami ke mooche hoti to woh meri maama hoti(if my aunt had beard thn she would be my uncle)".. SO better enjoy cric, apprecaite gud cric and live in reality !!!!! India lost is past now...move on man!!!
Re: If india is qualified to semis
by santoshkrsna on Jun 19, 2009 11:05 AM
just becoz u cant beat pakistan, why cry ? let the best team win whether it is pakistan, srilanka, nepal or even bhutan.
Nice to see comments purely on talent, or else everyone was bashing pak. With no fault of the cricketers in the mess pak.and its country is in, the cricketers have done well. All the cricket boards and specially the Icc, should look in the matters of pak cricket as there are only a few(8) very talented and competitive countries playing cricket.
Re: GOOD COMMENTS
by mira on Jun 19, 2009 11:10 AM
It is terribly insulting to cricket to find Indian supporters not minding their team to losing, but do not want Pak. team to win. I do not understand this double standards. I also support India, but I have no grudge against Pak. team. They played brilliantly against SA yesterday. It is all the more appreciable since Pak. team does not play in many matches (for no fault of the team). May be this is the reason why they have to excel in the limited number of appearances they make. Unlike the Indian team which keeps on playing. Within 10 days of this tournament, they are off to playing the next series in WI. BCCI reminds me of some Goonda employers employing bonded labourers in granite quaries where the workers have to work 14-16 hours a day!! How can you find motivation when quality is compromised for quantity?
yesetrday Kallis was batting like Dhoni. I saw him nudging aroung when they needed almost 12.5 an over. Though he played some big strokes, I thought he could have played more aggressively. Smith is not fit for t20 and he was tottally out of form.
Re: SA
by Harish Iyer on Jun 19, 2009 10:53 AM
SA is pathetic. Pak plays t20 like no other team. their entrire domestic cricket is t20 only. no wonder they r finals seond time and in all certainity win too.
Re: Re: SA
by amit singh on Jun 19, 2009 10:57 AM
Harish.. stop praising. just bcos they have entered the semifinal, its not that other teams were not good. Only thing is that they were not good enough on that particular day. Pak has won and now u r descibing their domestic structure as best. cummon!
Re: Re: Re: SA
by Harish Iyer on Jun 19, 2009 11:01 AM
i just said their domestic structure is all t20s. does it mean it is best ?? i am not supporting pak .. i enjoy good cricket. and pak is playing that. as simple.
