Discussion Board

Should the ''doosra'' be banned?


Total 110 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
Praful Venugopal
Doosra is not the issue the bowler is...
by Praful Venugopal on Jul 28, 2009 03:41 PM  | Hide replies

How come Saqlain never got called or never had any complaint for the doosra against him in his entire career. Has anyone wondered? Because he was the only bowler in the world who could deliver the doosra without straightening the elbow at the point of delivery. After all he invented it. Every other copy cat chucks the doosra including Murali, Harbhajan, Ajmal, Malik...Bhajji, especially after he was called early on in his career started swivelling his chest to face the bowler so as to make the chuck look minimal.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
nischal maniar
Re: Doosra is not the issue the bowler is...
by nischal maniar on Jul 29, 2009 12:06 AM
True ... and one more fact is .. saqlain never bowled doosra ... he always bowled the straighter one that never spun or spun the other way with the help of cracks on the pitch. But he never used his wrists to bowl doosra, he just changed his direction of his fingers while bowling the offspin

   Forward   |   Report abuse
logical stab
Re: Re: Doosra is not the issue the bowler is...
by logical stab on Jul 29, 2009 08:17 AM
hey loser nischal. Saqlain was the first one to bowl the 'doosra' and thats how it came into being. I agree with praful venugopal's view

   Forward   |   Report abuse
A Singh
Doosra is Chuck-Ball
by A Singh on Jul 28, 2009 01:00 PM  | Hide replies

Doosra is an Elbow Ball. It cannot be bowled without straightening and jerking the elbow. Technicalities like allowing the Elbow Joint to open up by certain degrees were introduced just to accommodate Murali. In common parlance, a delivery is legal as long as the arm remains perfectly straight till the point of delivery. Both Murali and Harbhajan start their action with a bent elbow, and straighten it just before release so as to show the back of the hand to the batsman. It is not that the Aussies cannot bowl it. Bowling Doosra is no big deal.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
vadhi raj
Re: Doosra is Chuck-Ball
by vadhi raj on Jul 28, 2009 02:52 PM
this is the style of oz,may be this is the way they like to put that their cry of non performance or failure

   Forward   |   Report abuse
BRUNO MONTEIRO
Re: Re: Doosra is Chuck-Ball
by BRUNO MONTEIRO on Jul 28, 2009 11:41 PM
Indian are the ones who cry the most and allways cry.. just because other teams have started a bit cryin it is been shown by indian media like they have been doing it and indian cricket team use to never do it.. Hypocrates we indians are...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Doosra is Chuck-Ball
by Against Pseudos on Jul 29, 2009 05:14 AM
Vadhi Raj:

What is the style of Oz?.....
If you read the article you'll come to know that they have banned their own bowlers from bowling or even learning doosra.....
YOU have a problem with that?....

On the other hand, we Indians continue sledging ourselves and have the biggest issues with other teams' sledging.... .

How does THAT sound in terms of hypocrisy?.....

Which approach - the Aussies' or ours - do you think falls in the category of "crying" versus taking tough clear cut decisions?

You decide...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
tornado
anything which is not in favour of aussie is illegal
by tornado on Jul 28, 2009 12:36 PM  | Hide replies

these aussies aer biggest cheaters of all time and now since they have started on being loosing side they are coming up with lame excuses....."doosra" is nothing but a second man in shane warne wife's life

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: anything which is not in favour of aussie is illegal
by Against Pseudos on Jul 29, 2009 05:06 AM
Tornado:

So you now prohibit Aussies from deciding what gets taught in Australia to their own bowlers?..... :)

Curious....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
jitendra khalpada
Re: anything which is not in favour of aussie is illegal
by jitendra khalpada on Jul 28, 2009 12:42 PM
The Body line bowling was alright as it was used by Englishmen, the inventor of cricket. Whatever we invent they make it iillegal.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
logical stab
Re: Re: anything which is not in favour of aussie is illegal
by logical stab on Jul 29, 2009 08:21 AM
Yo jitendra, it was saqlain who bowled the doosra first. Why did u say 'we'? Now if u support ur statement by saying you meant the asian countries by we, then that includes pakistan. It wont take a hypocrite like you to start foul mouthing pakistanis as well. get a life

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dara R
Re: Re: anything which is not in favour of aussie is illegal
by Dara R on Jul 28, 2009 01:14 PM
....Very true...!!!...thats Australians...!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ramjee Swaminathan
Doosra
by Ramjee Swaminathan on Jul 28, 2009 12:16 PM  | Hide replies

If Lasith Malinga's slinger is legitimate... we can as well legitimise any other sort of action including direct chucking.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Indian Guru
Re: Doosra
by Indian Guru on Jul 28, 2009 12:42 PM
Lasith Malinga's action though legitimate needs to be banned as the batsman tend to not pick the bowl when released. Even Sachin apart from Australians had some issues picking up the action.

His fulltoss deliveries have always created confusion with the lower end batsman. He needs to be banned before someone gets seriously injured.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
logical stab
Re: Re: Doosra
by logical stab on Jul 29, 2009 08:24 AM
Freak show, if his full toss deliveries have created 'confusion' among lower oreder batsmen that shows how good and deceptive he is. I wish he rockets a full toss on your balls

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Anurag Rathore
Re: Doosra
by Anurag Rathore on Jul 28, 2009 12:21 PM
you're a moron. learn something about cricket before commenting .

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ramjee Swaminathan
Re: Re: Doosra
by Ramjee Swaminathan on Jul 28, 2009 12:30 PM
Dear Anurag....I am aware of the rules and also understand that the delivery is legitimate if there is no straightening of the elbow and also if the ball is delivered above the ear level of the bowler.I also understand that his action is legitimate based on the current rules.But I am worried that if this continues,we will have kid practicing such action and in a few years time we will not find any bowlers with classic action playing at international level

   Forward   |   Report abuse
deewaker pandey
Re: Doosra
by deewaker pandey on Jul 28, 2009 12:21 PM
he moves his hand with 45 degree frm vertical line. y thre is no rule for moving the hand vertically?thre is no prb wid his elbow bt hecnt mve his hand vertically. tht the biggest prb.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
madan menon
Re: Re: Doosra
by madan menon on Jul 28, 2009 12:41 PM
brilliant.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sudhir Dave
The 'doosra': an art of spin bowling or chucking?
by Sudhir Dave on Jul 28, 2009 12:10 PM

IT IS ART OF BOWLINNG.ART IS ALWAYS BEYOND DISCUSSION.
SUDHIR

    Forward  |  Report abuse
nitin patidar
ICC
by nitin patidar on Jul 28, 2009 12:09 PM  | Hide replies

ICC should make a rule that till age of 34 player dont take retirement from test cricket,then test cricket will save

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Total 110 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
Write a message