Re: Bap ek numberi beta dus numberi
by yaseer on Jan 05, 2009 10:33 AM
Mr XYZ I have nothing against your opinion because everyone has the right to speak out in a democratic country but I'd like to tell you one thing until and unless a verdict is not given in a case, which in this case it will never come out because the pathetic BCCI is headed by a politician. (So they can never provide any evidence, as there are none) so you cannot proclaim anyone a match fixer. I feel you should see the match against Pakistan where Prabhakar and Mongia were unable to make a handful of runs in more than twice the number of balls. Tell me who is the real match fixer. No love lost but 'IF' tomorrow someone calls you as a traitor we won't call your son as the same. :-)
Re: Re: Bap ek numberi beta dus numberi
by yaseer on Jan 05, 2009 10:42 AM
Can anyone tell me what an abuse really means........ only that someone reports it as an abuse its removed. come on dork heads use your brains not your feelings. No one is guilty until proven. I don't think any of our cricketers are match fixers. they were removed at their peek just to accomodate people who can pay to come in the indian team......... have you seen the movie Iqbal. Go watch it.
Azhar was not the only one who have had charges of Match-fixing... Kapil, Prabhakar, Jaedja and Mongia were also involved... but he is dumped because there are so many people like to see Azhar in trouble since the time he debuts... and moreover lead the Team India for a decade...So, Mr. Kapil got scott-free after weeping on national TV as he was bigger Icon and got the symathy of our country men. Well.. its better if we forget those stories of past and looking to the future and wish new cricketers of India just the BEST OF LUCK..
Re: IT WAS THE BIG CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE PERSON WHO SERVED INDIA
by hmm on Jan 05, 2009 11:06 AM
HE IS A LOST CHARACTER.WHEN HIS CHILDREN 1ST WIFE HATE HIM-MEDIA SAYS AZHAR'S SON-NO AZHAR'S 1ST WIFE'S SON-YES
I dont know who many of you are aware of the case filed in a Hyderabad court by Azhar against BCCI for banning him from the Indian team. When the judge asked BCCI to present its evidence, its advocate told the court that BCCI had no evidence, but only had strong doubts including statements from Sachin. How can Sachin's statement be evidence? So how come BCCI proclaims that Azhar is guilty? Even today, BCCI has not been able to prove anything against Azhar. Give the man a break, he was a great batsman and India's most successful captain.
Re: Re: BCCI had no proof against Azhar
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 06, 2009 10:36 AM
How is it a "fact" if there is no proof? Facts, by their very nature, are proven through evidence. So, if BCCI does not have any evidence, how does it become an established fact?
Re: Re: Re: BCCI had no proof against Azhar
by Vijay Singhal on Jan 05, 2009 10:26 AM
You can stopn Jadeja or anybody from playing cricket if they fixed any match, but you can not stop them from earning their bread from other means whether bollywood or hollywood.
Re: Re: BCCI had no proof against Azhar
by Suresh on Jan 05, 2009 10:15 AM
I call you a crook without evidence, how will you feel? The law is very clear, every man is innocent until proven guilty. Even scamsters like Laloo or Antulay are able to get away as they influence the witnesses and have top notch lawyers.
Re: Re: Re: BCCI had no proof against Azhar
by vs on Jan 05, 2009 10:21 AM
And Mayawati - a culprit in collecting maamul for her birthday bash and political publicity - seems to have gone scot free in the state police "investigation" of the torture and murder of the PWD engineer.
Re: Re: Re: BCCI had no proof against Azhar
by Vijay Singhal on Jan 05, 2009 10:24 AM
But BCCI is no fool to ban him for life. They must have got some proofs although not so stronger.
Re: Re: Re: Re: BCCI had no proof against Azhar
by Suresh on Jan 05, 2009 10:28 AM
Read the court documents. BCCI told the court that it had not banned Azhar, he was merely dropped from the team for non-performance. Azhar was dropped mainly to please some senior players who did not get along with him.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: BCCI had no proof against Azhar
by Vijay Singhal on Jan 05, 2009 11:04 AM
Then why are you saying that he was banned? He should have shown his telent by playing good cricket at lower levels. Actually he was palying with Bijlani.
Whatever may be his talent he should not be selected for any team in India as he belongs to a family where his father has sold India's prestige for money. BCCI should immediately intervene & prevent SRK's effort to accomodate him
Re: Traitor's family
by masoom on Jan 05, 2009 10:37 AM
EVEN GEORGE FERNANDES SHOULD BE BANNED FROM ANY POLITICS AS HE HAD SOLD ARMS TO OUTSIDERS ILLEGALLY AS WELL AS HE WAS ALSO INVOLVED IN SCAM OF THE COFFINS OF THE INDIAN SOLDIERS WHO DIED IN KARGIL WAR
Re: Match fixer
by Rakesh R on Jan 05, 2009 10:49 AM
Usme is bache ki galti kya hain Deepak? His dad did things that are uncalled for from the captain of a national team and for that he was punished. Why do you want to point fingures at this kid for that?
Re: Match fixer
by Suresh on Jan 05, 2009 10:06 AM
I dont know who many of you are aware of the case filed in a Hyderabad court by Azhar against BCCI for banning him from the Indian team. When the judge asked BCCI to present its evidence, its advocate told the court that BCCI had no evidence. So how come Azhar is guilty? Even today, BCCI has not been able to prove anything against Azhar. Give the man a break, he was a great batsman and India's most successful captain.
Re: Match fixer
by vijay reddy on Jan 05, 2009 10:14 AM
His dad might have fixed matches but what has he to do with that. We have dynasties in poilitics and films but they have no place in politics. They have to prove themselves and be up there to be counted; thatswhy you dont see a lot of them shining. so, nobody should have a problem with 'sons' in sports and that too with a private franchise. KKR are not fools to take if he has no talent.
