Modi's problems are nothing new to Indian cricket. Pawar had problems with Dalmiya and vice-versa. Those cases continue to be in the courts. However, Modi going to jail will not spell the end of the IPL unlike ECB's Golden Goose Stanford. Again, the IPL involves some major Indian corporates, not one shady where-did-he-come-from "entrepreneur
Will be wonderful to see what they would do once they realize how Lalit Modi and other jokers are found guilty of fraud in BCCI. After all, politicians wish to jump in to any entity wherever there is money. Will they ban BCCI?
Re: But stanford enjoyed with English players wives and Girlfrien
by SHYAMA PRASAD on Feb 18, 2009 11:26 AM
Ha Ha Haaa!!!!Why you are talking about Stanford. Think of our own Vijay Mallya. Hehas enjoyed all the Cinema females.......
Re: Re: Re: But stanford enjoyed with English players wives and G
by Chaturchuramoni Chatterjee on Feb 18, 2009 04:33 PM
Don't know about females, but Mallaya owns an IPL team.
The Securities and Exchange Commission said the financier had orchestrated "a fraudulent, multi-billion dollar investment scheme". The SEC said the fraud was "based on false promises and fabricated historical return data". English cricket bosses have pulled out of sponsorship talks with Sir Allen. The charges against Sir Allen, three of his companies and two executives of those companies followed a raid by US marshalls on the Houston, Texas, offices of Stanford Financial Group. We are alleging a fraud of shocking magnitude that has spread its tentacles throughout the world
Rose Romero, SEC A US judge has frozen the assets of Sir Allen and the other defendants as well as those of the Stanford Group, its Antigua-based subsidiary Stanford International Bank (SIB) and another subsidiary, investment advisor Stanford Capital Management. A receiver has been appointed to "preserve assets for investors", the SEC said. 'Close circle' Sir Allen last year promoted the Stanford cricket series which saw a West Indian all-star team - the Stanford Superstars - beat an England team for a $20m prize. US marshalls swoop on Stanford HQ
The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) suspended sponsorship negotiations with him following the fraud charges. The ECB has a five-year deal to play games against the Stanford Superstars. The SEC said that the Stanford International Bank - the largest in the Caribbean - sold approximately $8bn worth of certificates of deposit to in
england players payed more in ipl is the biggest comedy of 2009....let both this team first form a good team...standford would have cancelled deal with this teams.....
Re: england players payed more in ipl is the biggest comedy of 20
by Rajesh Vyas on Feb 18, 2009 10:26 AM
Dear Arul:
You are exactly right. The England team is highly overrated. Both Pieterson and Flintoff are ordinary players and a lot of unnecssary hype is created by the media. Paying 1.5 Million US Dollars for these players is indeed the height of idiocy.
Re: Re: england players payed more in ipl is the biggest comedy o
by bharatmatakijay on Feb 18, 2009 11:10 AM
yaa really rajesh ji,if pieterson and flintoff is ordinary then i blve rest of world cricket player are below them go and see there records which is awaesome
Re: Re: Re: england players payed more in ipl is the biggest come
by vinay on Feb 18, 2009 09:31 PM
kp n flintoff r good but not match winners, else their team wudnt hv lost to ind 5-0.
Re: england players payed more in ipl is the biggest comedy of 20
by abhinay reddy on Feb 18, 2009 11:25 AM
England may not b gud team bit it doesnt mean KP and flintoff are ordinary...they are among the best in T20...remember India and WI are not gud team in the past 15 or 20 yrs it doesnt mean Sachin and Lara are ordinary...
Re: Re: england players payed more in ipl is the biggest comedy o
by bharatmatakijay on Feb 18, 2009 11:32 AM
dont comapre sachin with lara lara is way ahead of sachin. he singal handly won the matches for w.indies so many times with very very ordinary team.
Re: england players payed more in ipl is the biggest comedy of 20
by vinay on Feb 18, 2009 09:30 PM
arul u r corect. eng players didnt deserve those high bucks. how can they get such a huge amt when there r many ind gr8s who hv delivered when it mattered most esp in odis, t20s. eng players r not match winners else, they wudnt hv lost to ind 5-0 or 7-0 (had they completed the tour). v r crazy for white ppl so as to pay more to them.
