To solve all these problems, I suggest that we have three separate teams for test cricket, one-day cricket and T20. No player should be in more than one team. India has a surfeit of talent and this will be a good way to give everyone a chance.
Re: Solve all problems
by Raj Thackeray on Feb 13, 2009 07:52 PM
Why stop at only three different teams. In fact we can have three teams to play against each nation. And we can play simultaneously with so many teams. And we can have so many retired cricketers as commentators and experts and support staff. This is REALLY A GOOD WAY TO GIVE EVERYONE A CHANCE
Re: Unjustice with RP singh
by mokashi s on Feb 13, 2009 08:11 PM
U r kidding...,arent u? He is the highest wicket taker this year in the RANJI season... took 42 wickets in 9 matches... Donot see urself thru the politician's gogles... now if the topic would ve been communal ..it would ve been u n me versus a guy frm other religion...isn't it..? now if its regional than its u vs me..isnt it..? come on ..get some education..for gods sake
Re: Re: Unjustice with RP singh
by vijay on Feb 13, 2009 09:16 PM
Although I am not taking sides if either RP or Dhawal,I must say one thing that RP just played one Ranji Match .So no comparison on the basis of Ranji Match.If you look at his international career He is much sucess full in fast pitches.You can see his track record. I think Kris Srikanth is just satisfying his ego by sidelining him.
Re: INJUSTICE DONE TO AJEEET AGARKAR
by Prem Mohan on Feb 13, 2009 06:23 PM
Just for my information, how old is Ajit Agarkar? He has been around for a long time.
how much has vijay performed in this year domestic cricket... on what basis srikant has selected him. i can understand dinesh kartikh getting selected as second wkeeper. but not vijay.
Re: Murli vijay
by Guest on Feb 13, 2009 07:03 PM
From Cric info.... Dont be a frog in the well sir... In November 2008 M Vijay, in association with Abhinav Mukund, added 462 for the first wicket in a Ranji game for Tamil Nadu. They might have fallen two short of the record by two runs, but Vijay was told he would have to leave the game midway and join the Indian team the next day for a Test against Australia. He got that chance because Gautam Gambhir, the regular opener, had been banned for one match. Vijay didn't look out of place at all, scoring 33 and 41, and running out Matthew Hayden. He was later selected as India's third opener for the Tests in New Zealand.
A tall, solid opening batsman, Vijay was an instant success in his debut Ranji season with Tamil Nadu, finishing as the third-highest run-getter with 628 runs in seven games at a 50-plus average in 2000-07. It was followed by another good season - 582 runs at 58.2. He was picked for the India A squad to face New Zealand A in two Tests at the start of the 2008-09 season, and scored 200 runs in four innings. Included in the India Red team for the Challenger Trophy, he finished as the tournament's second-highest run-getter, which finally led to his Test selection. This was rapid progress for someone who had picked proper cricket relatively late, at 17.
Re: Murli vijay
by Jo Su on Feb 13, 2009 07:04 PM
Sir.. dont be a frog in the well, from cricinfo In November 2008 M Vijay, in association with Abhinav Mukund, added 462 for the first wicket in a Ranji game for Tamil Nadu. They might have fallen two short of the record by two runs, but Vijay was told he would have to leave the game midway and join the Indian team the next day for a Test against Australia. He got that chance because Gautam Gambhir, the regular opener, had been banned for one match. Vijay didn't look out of place at all, scoring 33 and 41, and running out Matthew Hayden. He was later selected as India's third opener for the Tests in New Zealand.
A tall, solid opening batsman, Vijay was an instant success in his debut Ranji season with Tamil Nadu, finishing as the third-highest run-getter with 628 runs in seven games at a 50-plus average in 2000-07. It was followed by another good season - 582 runs at 58.2. He was picked for the India A squad to face New Zealand A in two Tests at the start of the 2008-09 season, and scored 200 runs in four innings. Included in the India Red team for the Challenger Trophy, he finished as the tournament's second-highest run-getter, which finally led to his Test selection. This was rapid progress for someone who had picked proper cricket relatively late, at 17.
I am surprised. I thought Lalu Yadav, Mulayam Yadav, Pappu Yadav will head the list. I am totally disappointed. This is unfair. Why politicians can't play. I am suggesting for another Premier League where only politicians will play and teams will be statewise. Some of the new rules should be,
1. You can refuse to leave the pitch even if you are declared out. 2. You can abuse anybody on the field. 3. You can wear any dress like dhoti,baniyan etc. 4.Cows and buffalos are allowed as fielders. 5. Tobacco and alcohol are allowed on the field.
Re: Re: Dhawal doesn't deserve selection
by Prem Mohan on Feb 13, 2009 06:24 PM
What is the meaning of "dude"? I have asked this question many times but no one has enlightened me.
Re: Re: Re: Dhawal doesn't deserve selection
by Rahul Kulkarni on Feb 13, 2009 06:44 PM
dude /dud, dyud/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [dood, dyood] Show IPA Pronunciation noun, verb, dud⋅ed, dud⋅ing. –noun 1. a man excessively concerned with his clothes, grooming, and manners. 2. Slang. fellow; chap. 3. a person reared in a large city. 4. Western U.S. an urban Easterner who vacations on a ranch. —Verb phrase 5. dude up, Informal. to dress in one's fanciest, best, or most stylish clothes; dress up: He got all duded up to go to the dance. Origin: 1880–85, Americanism; orig. uncert.
Re: Re: Dhawal doesn't deserve selection
by Paresh Naik on Feb 14, 2009 12:47 AM
Thanks dear. Its quite relaxing on this site. So many like .... around.
Re: Dhawal doesn't deserve selection
by pradeek kr. verma on Feb 13, 2009 11:50 PM
Dear Naik, Whats about Raj Thakery he can also play with them. He is a joker politician.
Re: Re: Dhawal doesn't deserve selection
by Paresh Naik on Feb 14, 2009 12:36 AM
Dear Verma yes Raj can play for his state however he must get selected first. Whichever way.
Re: Why Ranadeb Bose was not selected ......
by Paresh Naik on Feb 13, 2009 06:07 PM
Birjubhai unless Indian team selection is done by British or Australian selectors no chance for Dinda or Bose. Sorry keep trying.
Re: Re: Dhawal
by nandhu kumar on Feb 13, 2009 05:12 PM
please change ur attidude friend... how many sports person from your bengal last 35 yrs of communist rule...
Re: Re: Dhawal
by Anurag Katriar on Feb 13, 2009 05:17 PM
Whats your problem in life boss?? Here is a bloke boasting of the best bowling performance in domestic cricket last year and you still feel he is undeserving for national selection. Why? just because he belongs to Mumbai. It is not his mistake that he belongs to Mumbai!!
Get our of this weird mentality and start applauding good decisions.
