Re: Re: Suggestion
by insan on Dec 18, 2009 01:26 PM
AP,
No need to coz whatever decision bucknor made was spontaneous and more over there was not replay option for him like Broad.so for me Broad is a racist where Bucknor a BAD UMPIRE.
Re: Re: Suggestion
by fink fanther on Dec 18, 2009 01:23 PM
AP, do you mind telling why you think this was a fair decision instead of commenting on every aspect under the sun but conviniently forgetting to state the basic premise of your argument?
Re: Re: Suggestion
by Abel Br on Dec 18, 2009 01:55 PM
studpid australians when they know they cant they will do all nonsense..... WI should walk out as a protest
This is pure discrimination from the part of ICC. These Australians are more guilty than the West Indian (Ben) by initiating the provocation and they are now left with mere warnings. The poor Ben is suspended from matches.
The same thing happened with Indians and other Asian countries also earlier. This is pure racial discrimination from the part of ICC. BCCI and other Asian Boards should immediately raise their words on this issue.
Keep up the good work Chris Broad. If you had banned the whole West Indian team for being mates of Benn, Australia would not have had to play a single match and yet have won the series. Three cheers to Broad
Re: Re: Well done Broad
by Krishnan Eswaran on Dec 18, 2009 01:19 PM
Yes, I did. But that was more to do with our Athithee Devo Bhava largesse, which we too seem to reserve for the fairer teams. :-)
Re: Re: Well done Broad
by Krishnan Eswaran on Dec 18, 2009 01:23 PM
And all the Indians getting whacked around in Aussie land also has nothing to do with color, I guess ;-)
Chris Broad's decisions are always harsh on non-Australian and non-South African players. All three should have been banned for one match at least. If Benn has brought the game to disrepute, what was the role of Haddin who provoked him?
This only proves that the Australians are the worst behaved team on field. The have picked up fights with all the Asian teams and the West Indians and even the Kiwis and the Englishmen.
Re: Biased verdict
by Against Pseudos on Dec 18, 2009 01:16 PM
Kumar:
Good point. I like the way you think. Haddin shouldn't have provoked Benn by running into Johnson and then making the whole world feel as if Benn was at fault. :)
And your conclusion is super fantastic. Your quest for revenge after the recent ODI series loss has to be commended. I bow before you. :)
Re: Re: Biased verdict
by kskumar on Dec 18, 2009 01:21 PM
Look at the facts before you bow or scrape before anyone.
The Great West Indian teams of the 1980s never abused their opponents on the field and yet were the greatest. The current Australian squad cannot be compared to them.
As for the ODI loss, yes it was a poor show. But remember the hiding the Australians got in the test series earlier. If they are so great, they should be able to win on all kinds of pitches. What is their record in India in tests? :-)
High time Chris Broad was suspended from the ICC panel for plain irrational decisions. How does he still continue is a mystery to me when people like Pawar etc. are the main figures in the BCCI.
Re: Suspend Broad
by pravin sarode on Dec 18, 2009 01:20 PM
poor west indians are now heading for 2-0 loss instead of 1-1 leveling the series thanks 2 board for morally discouraging or sledging west indies team so that they lost their confidence. racial comments by harbhajan towards andrew symonds also had more punishment for bhajji but symonds escaped free, watson provoced gautam gambhir for assult but gambhir got one match ban not watson. so king can do no wrong like wise oz are king of cricket can do no wrong mr. rajiv ipl gives easy money to all player hence these ipl players do not play test cricket with equal concentration so every body wants money with out much work EASY MONEY THAT IS WHY MATCHES R FIXED & AZARUDDIN GETS MLA
Re: Suspend Broad
by pravin sarode on Dec 18, 2009 01:19 PM
poor west indians are now heading for 2-0 loss instead of 1-1 leveling the series thanks 2 board for morally discouraging or sledging west indies team so that they lost their confidence. racial comments by harbhajan towards andrew symonds also had more punishment for bhajji but symonds escaped free, watson provoced gautam gambhir for assult but gambhir got one match ban not watson. so king can do no wrong like wise oz are king of cricket can do no wrong mr. rajiv ipl gives easy money to all player hence these ipl players do not play test cricket with equal concentration so every body wants money with out much work EASY MONEY THAT IS WHY MATCHES R FIXED & AZARUDDIN GETS MLA
Aussies have as usual got away once again with petty fines , while opposition team players have always been banned or suspended. This happens when the match refrees have been either from england or new zealand. No point in crying over this as this behaviour will never change.
Re: got away
by Against Pseudos on Dec 18, 2009 01:12 PM
VenkatC:
What we see as the usual behaviour is seen differently by them. What they see are the regular issues are blown out of proportion by us. This cultural difference will exist always, not just in cricket but in all walks of life.
