Re: Mr Boycott youwho is saying this ?
by sanjay on Oct 04, 2008 11:24 AM
You fooled Dalmiya regime and Indian Public in general by calling a ordinary player and prince of Kolkata for your endorsements
Its non of outsiders business to look into the matter of selection of Indian cricket team. Apart from Gautam Gambhir and Sehawag and Jaffer no one has proven themselve as best middle order batsman Indian selectors are well enough strong to select indian cricket team
I agree with the comment that some seniors are past thier used by date and only in there for endorsments or selfish motives, but wassim jaffer as one of the 'best of the next generation' is laughable.
Re: next generation boycott
by prashant kalantri on Oct 04, 2008 11:49 AM
I think you are eyeing the pay package offered to selectors recently by BCCI,
also Mr. boycott is writing this for his own money that he is getting from telegraph, he better should write for his own country and not intervene with our affairs, let the BCCI and our committee do it, they are paid for it
what is the wrong if somebody is trying to perform better at old age and trying to get endorsements, it is abusiness, why dhoni is issuing staement against seniors, it is for his endorsements only
no harm in keeping any senior/junior in cricket till the time they are performing.
Well said boycott, some one has guts to say these little things; we are living in this part of the world where we have blind hero worship; if we can't get rid of a player like ganguly at this juncture, I am afraid where we are heading towards. Dravid, Laxman and Tendulakr atleast have played well in the past consistently whereas ganguly was good only against some of the weakest bowling attacks in the world. It is the media and people from certain part of India who cry whenever ganguly is removed and they will continue to do that. Australians will be pleased if at all as there are 2 or 3 wickets at cheap purchase. These cricketers think that it is their private property and they will be happy as long as we have faithful (blind) followers. Regards. Krishna
Re: cricket
by Sameer S on Oct 04, 2008 10:10 AM
Boycott why u want to interfare in indian cricket? they are playing well thtswhy they are getting good money
71.1 Ojha to Krejza, OUT, on a good length outside the off stump, Krejza has an almighty go at it and gets an outside edge. Yuvraj, at first slip anticipates well and takes a good catch to make it a disappointing match for Krejza till now JJ Krejza c Yuvraj Singh b Ojha 0 (3b 0x4 0x6) SR: 0.00
Why Boycott having headache for Indian affairs of cricket? Indians are still possessing the mentality of slaves: In every sphere of Indian lives unwanted foreign interferance are freely available!!! And unfortunate part of the game is plenty Indian morons are there to take them as their GURUDEV!!!My suggestion to Mr. Boycott is that he should/must confine to the affairs of his country's cricket affairs where his type of expertise very much needed in lieu of poking his dirty nose indian affairs like Chappel did. Dear Indians please be careful of these dirty people, apply your own mind to take decision for your country's interest.Don't sell indian interest to foreigners as our politicians have been doing even after the independence of India. Be caucious and careful. Best of luck. SKG, HYD.
69.4 Ojha to Haddin, OUT, seeing Haddin's intentions Ojha pitches one short, it turns sharply and beats the outside edge of advancing Haddin. Patel, comfortably pouches the delivery and flicks the bails off in one go. Good start to the day by Board Presidents XI BJ Haddin st wicketkeeperPatel b Ojha 34 (87b 5x4 1x6) SR: 39.08
