What if the stump microphone evidence also throws up evidence Pointing, Gilchrist, and others who testified against Bhajji Will Procter limited hearing capacity earn him the boot.
Just wish this spinless Rediff had the guts to expose the kind of sledging used by the Aussies against non white players. Most of the Indians who write against Bhajji or for that matter against any Indian player do for some cheap reasons & somehow they are cluless about the game & sledging.
Can't see any reason as to why these some Indians have such ardent hatred for our players & are always supportive of the white race, colonial hang-ups....................?
We can see terrible inconsistency if we look at the ICC's rulings over player behaviour. Rashid Latif was banned for claiming a catch when it was clearly a bump ball. Here in Sydney when Michael Clarke shamelessly claimed Ganguly's catch and nobody had a problem with that! It was also a pity to hear out pple like Sunil Gavaskar on this matter.
RE:RE:Terrible Inconsistency!
by Sourabh Kulkarni on Jan 28, 2008 09:38 AM
And then again today morning the same thing happened when sachin faced the 1st ball of his innings. this time the culprit was Jacques.
how can we indians be sure the audio tapes from the microphone are not doctored. the time taken by the icc and the sudden emergence of the audio from the mic clearly shows there is some fishy. afterall, we know CA punished shane and mark for giving weather reports to bookies and tried to convince the world both didnt divulge anything more
