Guys, Please voice your opinion on cricinfo and BBC too. The whole world reads BBC and Cricinfo and let the world know how we feel. There are a lot of australians up there claiming whatever ponting and his team mates did in SCG was fair. Lets give them a fitting reply
RE:Post your opinion on BBC and Cricinfo too..
by krishna chauhan on Jan 08, 2008 01:32 PM
are aisa to apne gali ke bache bhi baimani nahi karte pahale lbw ki appile feer catch out ki appile wo bhi ponting
(5) When AUZ is playing even if the ball is delivered from the batting crease [:)] it WILL NOT be considered as No Ball. (6) When any other team is playing you should deliver the ball from outside the boundary line and if you over step from the boundary line it will be a No Ball. (7) When AUZ is batting - if a catch is taken irrespective of from where the ball is delivered it will be declared as No Ball. (8) When AUZ is bowling if a bouncer hits you on the head 2 meters in front of the crease still you will be given out LBW. The benifit of doubt (if the ball would have somehow came down to hit the stumps) will be given to the bowler. An example is when RP Singh was given out so forward and the ball just chipping the top top top of let stump. The benifit of doubt was given to Bowler as otherwise Umpires will be loosing Millions from AUZ. Next over will be faced by determined Kumble and he wouldn't give any chance even under the above rules [:)] (9) When AUZ is batting and if there is a run out - if the appeal is near batting crease and if both the betsmen are out of bowling crease it will not be given out. Again the Benifit of doubt rule applies here. The doubt that who is out of the crease. (10) While runout if both the batsman are inside bowling crease again they will be not out as per Benifit of doubt rule. Doubt that who is inside the crease. (11) In any other situation since both the umpires are inside the bowling and batting crease respectively it will be given not
read prem panickar's blog. sharad pawar has interests in IPL. there are several prominent former international players roped in. we need pawar to call this tour off. no compromises pleae. this compromise scene stinks. indian team honour is at stake. no wonder sachin sent an sms to pawar. if pawar makes any comromise, we should turn our ire towards pawar.
sharad pawar was pushed by ponting during icc championship trophy 2006 in ind.
now if this pawar does nt act n if he forces our team to play in ausi for licking money, all fans need to kick him from the back n throw him to the arabian sea. i think pak's inzy was brave enough to lead his team back, as his team was considered as cheat. similarly kumble shud show his guts n full team shud say no, even if bcci wants to lick money.
I think its really appreciable on Sachin's part to stand by his team member.This is something which is expected froma senior player like him, and by this act of his, he has re-instated the fact that he is a team player and would takee no shit from any one who hampers the spirit of the game, even if they are the mighty aussies!!! Bravo Tendlya
RE:Depiction of maturity
by Raman on Jan 08, 2008 04:18 AM
Sending a SMS is not something that gives him the title Bravo,telling it out in the open or calling Pawar directly and telling him to take stern action would be bravo,Saurav Ganguly if he was the captain wouldve done just that,thats why he is called Bengal Tiger,Sachin if criticized would come out a cry baby like how he did after the world cup and beg for mercy,but if its for Bhajji he sends a SMS,how about a email or a snail mail in the post that will reach Pawar in 15 days...any other team wouldve abandoned the tour by now or atleast walked out of that match..these guys are just playing for match fees now..
