RE:I would burst crackers if CSK lost
by Prabu SM on Apr 24, 2008 05:20 PM
CSK is certainly going to make into the SF and they have a very good chance of becoming the champions.
Though Hayden and Hussey will be gone soon, they will be joined by Ntini and Morkel, which will make their bowling dept stronbger. They also have Fleming, who is a good replacement for Hayden.
In my opinion either it is ICL or IPL the benefit is for the cricket and its fans. I think both of these cricket corporates should think of taking team India to the next level I hope ther are some wise people around them.God please bless my Team INDIA.
RE:prem panicker is an idiot
by kaushik on Apr 24, 2008 05:10 PM
I have better things to do than argue with an ignorant moron like you. Go die your own miserable lonely death.
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:prem panicker is an idiot
by kaushik on Apr 24, 2008 05:15 PM
No...it goes to show some of us have jobs,friends ,family and a life to live. Unlike a lonely loser like you whose only source of entertainment is writing rubbish abusive nonsense on the internet.
RE:prem panicker is an idiot
by kaushik on Apr 24, 2008 05:21 PM
I write here day and night ? I guess I cant blame delusional idiots like you who keep seeing things. I log in to Rediff only once a week.
RE:prem panicker is an idiot
by RR on Apr 24, 2008 05:09 PM
Uttam Desai, Just one request, change the capital to Hyderabad or Chennai then you see who dominates??
RE:prem panicker is an idiot
by kaushik on Apr 24, 2008 04:47 PM
Hey frustrated moron with an inferiority complex, try writing a decent comment once in a while without blaming a community. I doubt a low class gutter scumbag like you can do that.
RE:prem panicker is an idiot
by kaushik on Apr 24, 2008 04:53 PM
How about the Mumbai crowds who cheered when Rahul Dravid got out or the Kolkata people when Laxman was out. Dont try to blame South Indians to cover your cheap insecurities, you inbred slum dweller.
RE:prem panicker is an idiot
by kaushik on Apr 24, 2008 04:56 PM
Hey it's much better than cleaning toilets and driving lorries like you do in the North.
RE:prem panicker is an idiot
by madan menon on Apr 24, 2008 05:06 PM
Mr. Uttam (or whatever)You can continue to blah blah and even say even Infosys was created by you. You should be Sympathized with for your unlimited ignorance. It is very cheap to Criticize people by their religion or region. Try to behave more decently.
RE:prem panicker the idiot mallu
by SK on Apr 24, 2008 04:47 PM
You don't have to show your rear side in the public like this - to tell the world that you are a loser
RE:prem panicker the idiot mallu
by shaji george on Apr 24, 2008 05:05 PM
Uttam Desai--only knows sachin and cricket. There are lot of other things happenings in this world man. You idiotonly watching cricket and aaj tak news. Look like you are sachin's----
As a people Indians cannot get over the habit of drooling and ogling over females. They publicly exhibit this perversion so shamelessly - making lewd comments, making actions, even go to the extend of touching etc.
This is *definitely* due to the image of women created by the media and movies - with all the suggestive dances, dialogues with dual meaning and 'item numbers'. This is creating a bad orientation in the mind of the people and they look upon every good looking female as an object of entertainment and pleasure. They stare at them like a jackal would stare its prey and make unwanted advances. The reason I say this is that I have observed (from my years abroad) that men from other countries and cultures don't seem to suffer from this 'disease' of staring, ogling, eve-teasing etc.
This IS a product of our filmi culture. There is nudity in foreign movies also - but all that will be as part of the story - not nudity for the sake of it.
And Rediff, you too are in the forefront of this ill-projection of women - with all the drool lists of hollywood and bollywood beauties you put out so religiously.
RE:I agree
by Khiladi on Apr 24, 2008 04:49 PM
Actually women entertainers are not required in a cricket stadium. I feel irritated though I am watching in TV. People are coming to watch cricket, not women in the cricket ground. They have many option, if required. Authorities are unfortunately thinking otherwise, according to their wishlist..!!
RE:I agree
by ganesh shyam on Apr 24, 2008 04:52 PM
absolutely....reason our women always covered...men get to see very little from the beginning n not used it.....virginity is followed by men/women...no sex before marriage....U cant get married then no sex...Solution:Govt like S'pore encourage safe prostitution,co-education schools are a must.... Compulsory national defense service for 2 yrs for all rich,famous,poor after Plus2 a must...
The moment IPF took off all the media is throwing their weight behind them - partisan in coverage.
Why they have not covered ICl which was also conducted in the similar lines - just because BCCI controls or the media has been paid money for the coverage from the loot they received from the public indirectly
RE:IPL v/s ICL
by ganesh shyam on Apr 24, 2008 04:55 PM
bcoz modi is a smart cookie n made ipl in the lines of english league with current players which public are used to n interested in seeing them again...u wl see lara,bond shifting to ipl...more money...more glamour...ie present modern civiliz....cheers
Ban dance bar girls who work within boundaries and show clevage of all size shapes color in new year celebrations, televesion soaps, drama, item songs adn now in front of family crowd [IPL wants to get the families to ground nah!!!]...deprive poor section the same means to make living as these women are doing...sachin K Pune
